CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CruelDesires Shutting down an IM session was not the OP's issue. Being betrayed by someone she trusted as a friend and with whom she obviously had feelings for is. Some who walk this path are more pliant and have a more easily swayed personality then others. What I was commenting on was the way others see that in a person and berate them and belittle them for that. Maybe they are angry in something they see in that person that they wish they could be? Maybe they think that person is unhealthy and project their values on them? This behavior is interesting and I have been pondering it recently. C-D I was talking with someone about this last evening, and the comment was made that perhaps some of the irritation comes out of the concern that if an s-type is accepted as being of the docile, passive, and/or jelly-bones type, that folks might start thinking that -all- s-types are that way... you know, back to the days of "Kneel before me, because you're submissive!" Much like feminism, it was brought up to me that a significant portion of the s-type population has spent a great deal of time explaining that they don't submit to just anyone, and that submissive does not equal weak, that when the s-types show up who -would- submit to anyone who knew what to do with it, and who do -need- that kind of direct management and the protective exoskeleton of a d-type (even in the vanilla world) to be able to manage, it seems like its thrown off at least a decade of 'progress'. My thing comes down to being authentic. To me, it is cruel to 'shape' someone into something that they are not constitutionally adapted to become, just because -I- am uncomfortable with what they are. "Tough love" that requires a gentle, docile, emotionally open, and caring person to become callous, hard, emotionally stifled, and merciless strikes me as being akin to abuse. Sure -- it can be done... but just because something -can- be done doesn't mean it -should- be done... especially if it means abridging the very nature of the person that we are professing to care for. Calla Firestorm
< Message edited by CallaFirestormBW -- 9/23/2008 8:07:46 AM >
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|