marieToo -> RE: What do you mean with fake DOMs (I hear in many ads...) (10/21/2008 4:05:02 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent It's not a given where your post leaves your views open to interpretation. It wasn't clear in the first instance that you weren't talking of the ads mentioned in the OP. Ok, maybe that's where the miscommunication came in. I was talking about how I would define a fake in general, not saying that it was an easy thing to do from an ad. But let me give you a quick example of someone that I would consider a fake, (or to use my word of preference) a "Fraud" (someone who lies, misleads or is intentionally deceitful). I heard from a guy on the other side not long ago. He introduced himself and said he was interested in finding a third party to join himself and his slave. I clicked onto his profile to find a complete contradiction of his email when I saw that he was a single man looking for a submissive. I wrote him back and basically told him that I don't respect liars. And he wrote me back saying that he deceived me in order to test me, to see if I would take the time to read his profile. Now how do I even know which is a lie? His original note? The profile? I wouldn't. But he's already shown himself to be fraudulent. Ok, now who am I to say he can't dominate someone? For all I know he can, but he can't dominant me because I've now deemed him to be full of shit....a poser....a fake.....someone who intentionally portrayed something that he wasn't in order to elicit a certain response or evoke a certain test. To me, that's one type of fake, a fraud, a poser, a liar, a bullshitter. There I've done it, I've judged someone a liar and a fraud and haven't even met him. That's just one example. quote:
How exactly can you make an informed judgement on a poster's integrity where you haven't met him/her in person? How do you make an "informed judgement" on a US presidential candidate's integrity, sincerity, ability, when you haven't met him? Or more to the point of the OP: How do you make an informed judgement when you read a collarme ad that's just so outlandish that you just know the person is full of it? You must have seen one or two in your time here and shrugged them off as "full of shit". No? Surely there are posters here who you have passed certain judgements on (good or bad), in the privacy of your own mind. How did you do that without meeting them?? Ever open a Nigerian scam mail? Is that a fake? How did you know without meeting him/her? (ok maybe that example is too easy) But come on....How do any of us make that judgement when connecting with someone online, then being in a position to decide whether or not they are worth meeting in realtime? How do we determine if they are a fake, an axe murderer, or a safe and sincere person to have coffee with? The answer for me: Communication, a lot of listening, perception, observation, a little gut instinct, and a dash of common sense for good measure...the same way we judge anyone else in our midst as whatever, online or otherwise. quote:
Well, yeah, you're entitled to define a fake as you see fit - a given, surely? Yes, of course. But it was never about my entitlement. It was about me trying to explain that I was (in my previous posts) merely speaking of how I define a fake, not how I would judge someone in particular as actually being one. Which are two distinctly different things....and I think that's where our signals got crossed : What is your definition of a fake? vs How do you determine if someone is a fake. quote:
Always a pleasure with you Marie; never a chore. Likewise. And something we'll never get caught debating about. :)
|
|
|
|