LaTigresse
Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: justgemmie quote:
ORIGINAL: LaTigresse Exactly, and if a slave choses an unhonourable owner........well then, they share as much responsibility as the owner. I guess it all comes down to priorities. greetings LaTigresse do You truly believe the Master to be unhonorable because of this one thing? seems a bit harsh and judgmental. It is His choice to do as He wishes - just as it is Your choice to allow Your slaves to vote what they choose. how is this different than allowing Your slave to have friends ... or not; or allowing Your slave to speak less than respectfully ... or not; or any myriad of things that make a dynamic. it's politics. it's a bomb waiting to explode with the emotions that it brings to the fore --- but it is just another "thing" in an M/s relationship, for the Master to decide on. well wishes, gemmie Gemmie, specifically yes and no. As I said, it all comes down to priorities. If it was important to the slave and he or she felt strongly about being able to vote as they wished, then yes, to me that would be dishonourable. However, I also feel that if it were an important issue, it should be among the things discussed prior to ownership. I guess it is something I feel strongly enough about, the rights of US citizenship, that any owner should honour their country enough to encourage their slave to vote responsibly after educating themself. So, I guess to me, honourable is also encouraging that slave to vote according to what he/she learned. Not just to be in agreement with me. What pleases me is intelligence and free thought, even in this sort of slavery.
_____________________________
My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one! Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!
|