stella41b
Posts: 4258
Joined: 10/16/2007 From: SW London (UK) Status: offline
|
Why single out submissives who need molding? What about some of the dominants out there? Just because you profess to be dominant doesn't mean that you cannot be vulnerable, or does it? Just a passing thought. I don't like the word 'molding'. To me you can mold something, an inanimate object such as a piece of clay, a block of wood, a piece of metal, but not a living, breathing, sentient human being, submissive or otherwise. Besides it's negative, it smacks of perfectionism, it focusses on things which are unacceptable, and allows the person being molded to escape the responsibility and ownership of their own issues. I'm not perfect, far from it in fact. I'm a human being, though at times the answer to what I'm being might be hard to fathom, but I'm human. I have issues and I have baggage, but it's all got my name on it, I own it, it's my responsibility. I'm the one who has to carry it around and deal with it. I accept this. So should the dominant who elects to be with me. Therefore instead of molding, I much prefer the term empowerment. Yes I can be a needy submissive at times, but this isn't the focus of what it's about for me, but what I can offer and bring to a relationship, and one of the things which I can bring to a relationship and one of the reasons I prefer being submissive is that I am able to empower a dominant. My empowerment comes from making things easier for my dominant, making things possible, giving her free and unrestricted access to everything that is me and everything I can do and have. By the same token I am open to empowerment, through the responses of my dominant. It's a sort of 'me strong, you strong, we strong' philosophy.
_____________________________
CM's Resident Lyricist also Facebook http://stella.baker.tripod.com/ 50NZpoints Q2 Simply Q
|