MadRabbit
Posts: 3460
Joined: 8/9/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: RayvenGoddess There are ways to satisfy a need for kink without breaking up a sexually incompatible marriage or cheating you know. While many people do associate BDSM activities and sex, there are people out there who are play partners who never have sex before/during/after a scene. Many pros out there (both Dom and sub), lay down the law that there will be no insertion of any sort by any party during a scene to avoid any taint of the prostitution. I don't see why, with the vanilla spouse's knowledge and understanding, that a kinky and faithful spouse can't form a platonic and non-sexual "play" realtionship with someone in the lifestyle and then go home after a meeting with them and bring their turned on state into the marriage bed. Speaking from personal experience, I have yet to meet a couple where one partner met his needs outside of the relationship due to an inadequacy in the relationship and the relationship remained healthy, functioning, and strong. Yes, some people are polyamorous and capable of finding fulfillment where their relationship needs are spread out among multiple partners, but a lot of us aren't. Having a play partner solely for fun and kink outside of a relationship is quite different then the above scenario, because it's not about fun and kink. It's about trying to fill a void that exists in the current relationship. We like to trivialize kink as "just sensations or just sex", but in all honesty, the issue goes a bit differently than that. It's about being understood and being with someone who is able to relate and love all your facets of who you are. If I have to hide or put away a major facet of who I am (my sexuality), then what kind of relationship is that? I have certain things about me that can't be compromised on, worked past, or dealt with. One is the fact that I am an Athiest and as such I can't be with a Christian. The spiritual element of a person is a major part of who they are and I can't validate their religious beliefs. I can't fully understand or comprehend why they have these beliefs and as such, there will be a major disconnect on this issue. The other is that I express my intimacy through an imbalance of authority in my relationships. Yes, I can express intimacy in other ways, but to know me on the most deepest, intimate level means to submit to me. Why would I be with someone who could never experience or connect with that facet of me and who I could never be intimate with on that kind of level?
_____________________________
Advice for New Dominants The Unpolitically Correct Lifestyle Definitions Obama is NOT the Messiah! He's just a VERY NAUGHTY BOY
|