Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
T, I been on both sides of this issue. I've foreclosed on people and after 9/11 I couldn't pay my obligation and needed to move out. In both instances, never did I tell, or was told, that a reasonable plan for facilitating an orderly property ownership transfer wasn't okay. The Congresswoman isn't suggesting a 'stay' to accommodate weather, or any reasonable situation, she suggesting outright fraud. Your 'rent' solution is viable. You can do as much now in CA, and I'm sure many other areas, simply with a phone call to the mortgage holder. It will be some portion of the interest being accrued and it can result ultimately in a larger obligation or write off, but no lender, individual or corporate, wants an empty home subject to immediate deterioration, and subsequent further reduction in value. Who knows, at the end of the tunnel, once there is some leveling off, both parties can sit down and negotiate a new mortgage based upon the real property value and not the inflated value created by the availability of bad lending policies and bad 'good intent' government home ownership programs. However, T, that won't happen if schemes like this are floated as 'solutions'. I've never been concerned with 'blame', so the first part of your post isn't important. It's when I see 'solutions' like this given legitimacy that give me no faith that any leader is willing to come to the forefront with a plan where pragmatic action is taken with full disclosure of the consequences. I'm desperate for somebody to stand up in front of the county and say to the citizens as you have "both sides made it into a dirty game." Well, game's over, most of us lost. Now, you who bought a home you can't support now, have to turn it over to your lenders. Lenders, who manipulated by payment, legislators who created opportunity to scheme borrowers, survive by selling your assets, merge, or file bankruptcy. Legislators, no additional spending, including 'COL' adjustments, on social programs until their is a surplus and cut your salary and staff 10%. No 'bail-out' money, but the department of commerce will entertain any business plan and is prepared to be a 'venture capital' partner for those dedicated to energy self sufficiency, infrastructure, or existing business take over. Environmentalists - take a time out from NEW restrictions to business and commerce; and any business plan resulting in a major environmental impact will be judged with the betterment of the USA and its citizens taking priority. Put that out there and wait a year and see what happens. Truth needs to be told T, reality needs to be hammered into the citizens. Our representatives should not be offering a plan to circumvent it.
|