DavanKael
Posts: 3072
Joined: 10/6/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sravaka This thread is bugging me, and I'm going to try to explain why. Some of it is what LaTigresse has already said... (I agree with NuevaVida-- you rock) but I suspect there's more there. Who on earth are these freaking weak-willed doormats that people are always talking about, as if they constitute a significant population among self-identified submissives?? I seriously think they are straw men (or straw doormats. whatever.) And thence a way for non-doormats and non-doormat-admirers to celebrate themselves gratuitously. (in other words, yes. chest thumping.) It takes strength to acknowledge that you have needs that your upbringing and society at large don't prepare you to embrace... and then to embrace them. It takes strength to serve well and enthusiastically, even when you're tired or distracted or whatever. It takes strength to be vulnerable, to hold yourself open, when every impulse demands that you protect yourself. And if the end result of exerting this strength is a partnership where one leads and one follows, without ambiguity, where both are free to be, fully and authentically... how is this in any way inferior or superior to partnerships that achieve joy and harmony through other means? One can express opinions without arrogance, and they can be accepted without condescension. One can (get this) submit totally and uncompromisingly to another's will without jeopardizing one's ability to be effective in dealing with practical matters, for oneself or for one's partner or in general. It's a question of temperaments, and of being well matched. I would find it utterly wearisome to have to be constantly reminding a partner, "hey! hey! i have a will of my own! but, wow! you are so domly-- watch me put it aside for you!" I just want to be, and want to be with someone who wants the same, for himself and for me. Maybe the main reason this makes no sense to me is that rabbits don't do "adversarial" with those they love. If I can extrapolate from LaTigresse's post... the only possible conflict in the "destroy me if it pleases you" scenario would be within the dominant him/herself. And rabbits seek partners who have the strength of their own to deal with that conflict judiciously. We're all strong, and we're all weak. May we all find our bliss. This thread is one of the more interesting I've seen in awhile: thank you, Michael. Sravaka (< waves >), I think that the points you raised are extremely valid and very well-said. In pondering the adversarial piece that you highlighted, I looked at relationships I have/have had. Most have not had acknowledged power dynamics, though I would argue that all relationships do have power dynamics. It is natural for me, if I feel a particular level of trust and partnership, to defer to my partner. If there is not that affinity, that depth, that investment or trust or partnership, I remain in charge. I can only think of one relationship to date that deviates from those stated modes of interaction: ie: that partner and I did have a particular level of trust and still a push-pull dynamic, though that partner preferred I be strongly on the D-side of things which is a difference. Even there, though, when we settled in with one another, we could be a collaborative force with which to be reckoned. I agree with you in that I don't dig adversarial interactions with my true partners, despite being a person of great formidability: I see such as indication of relational problems. I think, actually, Michael is saying the same basic thing. I'll look forward to seeing this thread unfold further. Davan
_____________________________
May you live as long as you wish & love as long as you live -Robert A Heinlein It's about the person & the bond,not the bondage -Me Waiting is 170NZ (Aka:Sex God Du Jour) pts Jesus,I've ALWAYS been a deviant -Leadership527,Jeff
|