Marc2b
Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
What I meant was that health care policies are determined by people who have their profits in mind when they make key decisions, not the general good of the public. Since I'm not innocent enough (anymore) to believe that people in power are genuinely interested in anything but keeping that power to any real degree, I would prefer to have someone making those decisions who felt their job was staked on making the right decision by the public than making that decision based on their profit margin. While I won’t deny that the profit motive is one of the factors that governs people's decision making it is not the only one. To believe otherwise is to demean people. I know my doctor genuinely cares about his patients (that’s why he’s my doctor) and I have no doubt that many others do as well. In the end, I’d rather have those decisions being made by someone who knows me, not some government bureaucrat who’s never even heard of me. quote:
Quibble point: It's not even the poorest anymore. Yes, the system is taxed by the poorest, but it's the growing segment of lower middle class families that are creating the most new demand for government-funded health care. They are creating a demand for health care, not government funded health care necessarily. That is a proposed "solution" that some are advocating. quote:
I don't think this is a genuinely solvable problem, unfortunately. Capitalism depends on creating supply and demand, and people by nature want to generate as much profit for their efforts as possible. As long as withholding supply generates the highest margin, you're just not going to convince anyone to increase supply and satisfy the demand at the cost of their margins. No matter how I turn this problem over in my head, there's just no good solution given the current systems. Withholding supply to increase profits only works when you have a captive market that needs (as opposed to desiring) a service or commodity. In a free market if, company X withholds supply then that just leaves the market open for companies Y and Z. In a captive market withholding supply of a desired (as opposed to needed) commodity or service simply means people won’t buy it. You are quite correct that this is ultimately not a solvable problem. Too often in politics (indeed, in all aspects of life) there are no solutions, only trade offs. The problem is in deciding which trade offs we as a society can live with. quote:
Oh man, I could go for a bonfire on the beach right about now. Well that’s something we can agree on. A roaring bonfire, a bottle of wine, perhaps a doobie or two, and the company of good friend – one of the finer things in life.
_____________________________
Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!
|