RE: NCSF Supports Google's Refusal to Violate Internet Privacy

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: NCSF Supports Google's Refusal to Violate Internet Privacy

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: NCSF Supports Google's Refusal to Violate Internet Privacy

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 5 [6]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: NCSF Supports Google's Refusal to Violate Internet ... - 2/6/2006 12:49:15 PM

Lordandmaster

Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline

Right, and you're not the same SirKenin who wrote this (on THIS VERY THREAD):

quote:

Very cool. Thanks. Question is, though, how much pull do they have? I can launch a similar lawsuit if I wanted. The question I am asking you, then, is does anybody actually listen to them when they speak? Or are they like a mouse fart in a hurricane?

I can also start My own group and produce a press release, but I do not think that really amounts to a hill of beans unless the powers that be will listen to what I have to say. If they want to fight this, that is fine by Me, but I am just questioning whether they have any amount of pull to do anything about it, or whether it is all verbiage.

http://www.collarchat.com/m_254079/mpage_3/key_cool/tm.htm#256854

You didn't say a word about protecting children then. You said NCSF was doing something "cool"--something that, in a brief moment of self-awareness, you recognized you'd never have the courage to do yourself. Your only concern was that they might not have the power to accomplish anything.

Of course, you have the courage to keep berating people from that chair behind your computer screen.

Yawn, this is a snoozer. Go on, you can believe whatever you'd like and keep changing your story every time someone shows how incoherent your statements are. I think just about everyone on the thread has made up their minds about this one.

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirKenin

Oh, and by the way.... While I think of it. Like I just finished saying to candystripper, My position is about defending the rights of those who can not defend their own. My position is one of support for the government.

This is not an injustice we face. It might be for you, but you are clearly selfish and I do not feel the least bit sorry for you. Suck it up.

This is one step of many required to get the abuse of children off the net. That is what I care about. I do not give a darn if you see another internet boob for the rest of your life. If I see My children violated on the internet, I will hold people like you accountable... And believe Me, as many people have figured out, I am the last person you want to cross. That is not an idle threat either. I will do whatever it takes to do My part to bring them down. I have done it to quite a few people in the past. I have no problems doing it to someone who would bring harm to an innocent child. ESPECIALLY Mine.

Does that sound like a lofty rationalization to you? Well too bad. My children are My first priority and I will defend them to the death. I do not give a shit about protecting your Google searches if it means saving a child.

(in reply to SirKenin)

Profile

Post #: 101

RE: NCSF Supports Google's Refusal to Violate Internet ... - 2/6/2006 1:05:20 PM

MrDiscipline44

Posts: 1776
Joined: 1/5/2005
Status: offline

Well, thats a noble cause, latex. And you're not the only one talking about fighting for the children. So are those on your opposition. LaM, candystripper, John Warren. They want their children and grand-children and great grand children to enjoy freedom. Not oppression. And why should my children be denied their freedom because you are afraid that your children are going to be snatched? The way I see it, saying "I'm it's for the children" is just an excuse for piss poor parenting. You are right though, the communities should band together.......... and teach children that it's not ok to go somewhere with someone without letting their parents know. Or to stay with people they know and in places they know, so they don't get snatched. In my opinion if one needs the government to get involved to keep their children safe, then they're just lazy parents who don't want to take responsibility for what they are and are not teaching their children. Why is it that my children must suffer or LaM's or candystripper's, for something you can't stop, no matter how hard you try. If you even try. Should I give up my rights for your lost cause? See, sitting here and saying "I'm against those pedophiles." is the same as those on here saying "I'm against the government busy-bodies."

_____________________________

If you love somebody, you have to be willing to break them.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.

Have you slapped your slave today?

(in reply to LATEXBABY64)

Profile

Post #: 102

RE: NCSF Supports Google's Refusal to Violate Internet ... - 2/6/2006 1:56:02 PM

Chaingang

Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline

Well said, MrDiscipline44.

Life is risky and always ends with one result: death.

Get used to it.

_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to MrDiscipline44)

Profile

Post #: 103

RE: NCSF Supports Google's Refusal to Violate Internet ... - 2/6/2006 4:09:19 PM

SirKenin

Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang

Can you explain precisely how bared boobs equals child snatching please? You're making enormous leaps in logic to legitimize government intrusions that are simply unnecessary.

The issue at hand is that people are afraid that searching for related searches to child pornography could implicate them and also violates their supposed rights to do so. This was discussed at length in a previous thread in this forum.

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to Chaingang)

Profile

Post #: 104

RE: NCSF Supports Google's Refusal to Violate Internet ... - 2/6/2006 5:10:03 PM

SirKenin

Posts: 2994
Joined: 10/31/2004
From: Barrie, ON Canada
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Right, and you're not the same SirKenin who wrote this (on THIS VERY THREAD):

quote:

Very cool. Thanks. Question is, though, how much pull do they have? I can launch a similar lawsuit if I wanted. The question I am asking you, then, is does anybody actually listen to them when they speak? Or are they like a mouse fart in a hurricane?

I can also start My own group and produce a press release, but I do not think that really amounts to a hill of beans unless the powers that be will listen to what I have to say. If they want to fight this, that is fine by Me, but I am just questioning whether they have any amount of pull to do anything about it, or whether it is all verbiage.

I was not commenting on the actions of the NCSF being cool. I was commenting on John Warren's very informative contribution being cool.

Edit: edited quote

< Message edited by SirKenin -- 2/6/2006 5:16:39 PM >

_____________________________

Hi. I don't care. Thanks.

Wicca: Pretending to be an ancient religion since 1956

Catholic Church: Serving up guilt since 107 AD.

(in reply to Lordandmaster)

Profile

Post #: 105

RE: NCSF Supports Google's Refusal to Violate Internet ... - 2/6/2006 9:52:11 PM

Real0ne

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren
History has shown that rights are won hard, lost easily and regained rarely. Sadly, we are discovering this all over again

quote:

government's subpoena

Yeh and it starts so innocently. so many things start thru a temporary necessity, said to detect terrorists, but like virtually everything else a goverment does it will get abused and they will push until they step to far and are taken to court and that will be a polititions running theme a few years from now. ssdd

i also agree with specific ongoing investigations and beyond that i would hope our law makers did not give them a blank check

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to JohnWarren)

Profile

Post #: 106