LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Andalusite LadyPact, I think high protocol relationships or events could be quite beautiful, and I have no problem with them! If I were at a BDSM event that wasn't specifically high-protocol, though, and someone refused to talk with me, I'd be more likely to associate their behaviour with vanilla rudeness than with high protocol or with speech restrictions. Hopefully, I'd figure out otherwise, that's just likely to be my first reaction. In that environment, how would I know who his owner is, so that I *could* get her permission to talk with him first? (assuming that he and I were at the snack or water table, and his owner was elsewhere) I certainly wouldn't try to get him to play with me, if he were wearing a collar, but I don't usually approach anyone for play in any case (or accept an offer of play that evening with someone I've just met, for that matter). Since the thread, at least in part, has been a chance to speak about how people feel about collars, I think I'd still be on topic taking this opportunity to discuss this. Please accept that I missed a lot of the back and forth that seemed to happen in some of the prior pages, so some of this may have been covered. I do know that people have mentioned that people wear collars for different reasons. What I find a bit funny is that people actually seem more accepting of the collar being a fashion statement (personal choice) than those who might have a higher standard of protocol associated with wearing one (another personal choice). If I'm at a BDSM event, I expect there to be a mixture of all kinds of people there who will use their own level of protocol. That includes those in M/s dynamics or leather folks. People who would consider it rude to approach an owned person in the first place. Where you say you would consider it vanilla rudeness, I say you have to take into consideration the environment that you are in. Actually, it would be you who would be the one being rude by not addressing the Dominant of the dynamic first. That's part of the culture for some people and I don't see why it would be terribly difficult to respect that. The chit chat at the snack table certainly isn't more important than the way people have chosen to live, is it? I've used this analogy on the boards before and it might be useful here as well. When I visit My Japanese friend's home, I don't wear My street shoes inside. (In fact, that's actually how I picked up the term 'street shoes'.) Now, I don't consider it disrespectful to bring outdoor dirt into the house on the soles of one's shoes, but they do. Since that's the way they live, I respect that when in their company. The very same can be said when dealing with folks who have higher protocol. You're walking your feet through the house of our dynamic. This is how we live. Of course, you have the right to decide if you are going to respect that or not.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|