Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: different loves?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: different loves? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: different loves? - 5/17/2009 5:25:28 PM   
Malkinius


Posts: 1814
Joined: 1/9/2004
Status: offline
Greetings sweetgirlseeks.....

quote:

ORIGINAL: sweetgirlseeks

quote:

ORIGINAL: Malkinius
If you become a slave, your happiness doesn't matter. What you want doesn't matter. What you want to do or don't want to do and when you do or don't want to do or not do it doesn't matter. You don't matter. When you are ready for that level of obedience and service, think hard about it then run like hell the other way. Only return to it if you can't do and be anything else. Otherwise you will be unhappy and will make other people unhappy.


Hello Malkinius,
Not to be argumentative, because I certainly respect your experience, etc... but the two statements that you made that I underlined above are a bit much I think.

If a girl is totally unhappy and is made to feel like she 'doesn't matter'... she will walk... unless she is totally lacking in self esteem.  
 
I did expect some sub or slave to say something about that. You are right, but that still doesn't change what I said. The reason why below.


quote:

I would rephrase it to say, if you are a slave, your happiness is primarily derived from your owner's happiness.  The primary thing that drives your own happiness and sense of value, is making your owner happy and knowing that he finds you pleasing and valuable in your service to him.       The slavegirl, i think, finds her true happiness in hearing 'good girl', seeing that smile on her owner's face and knowing in her heart that He finds her pleasing to Him.    Of course, if he is just 'some guy' and not a Man who inspires her to serve him fully with grace and fire, she will probably find herself perhaps content at best, but rather hollow and uninspired.  If the latter is the case, i can see where she might start looking to her own selfish needs for happiness.    That wouldn't be so much because she is not a slave, but perhaps, because she is serving the wrong Master for her.

~sgs

You are right about one of the places where a slave's happiness comes from. But you are not completely right. A consensual slave's happiness comes from two places. The first is the act of serving others and second is the pleasure others get from her actions. Subs are happy when they get what they want even if it is abuse and pain. The difference is inner and outer directed happiness.

I said a slave's happiness doesn't matter. What she does matters. How pleased her owner is with her matters. Things can be done with and to her irregardless of whether a slave is happy about them or not. Commands are given not based on her happiness with them or their results or anything else about her. She...the person who is the slave doesn't matter if a command is given. She obeys or she doesn't. That matters. How she obeys matters as well.

You are right in that any owner who doesn't take into account the physical well being of his slave is stupid. The same goes for her mental well being as well. But, sometimes, especially when he wants to make a point, those things are ignored. Sometimes they may even be deliberately done so she will not be happy about it. The point is....when all is said and done....a slave's whishes, interests, happiness, etc. doesn't matter. What she is and does matters. What she is to her owner matters. That is the point of being property. You matter only in how you affect others. Anything else is just playing games that you can stop when it stops being fun.

Be well....

Malkinius





_____________________________

A questioner by inclination...An Auctioneer for the fun of it
http://www.HouseMalkinius.com    The goal is community.

(in reply to sweetgirlseeks)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: different loves? - 5/17/2009 5:31:45 PM   
LotusSong


Posts: 6334
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Domme Emeritus
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: hunnibunni09

im am just recently out of my very first D/s relation ship we split after  almost 10months due to alot of misunderstandings i admitt mainly on my behalf    but the main problems were that i was madly head over heels in love he was too i and i have no doubt in my mind about that now.

but while in the relationship i just couldnt understand how he could love yet treat me and act the way he did   such as not allowing me somehwere, refusing permssion to do something, speak 2 me in a certain manner and left evreything such as chores and cooking to me  never helped out once  the fights would end where he demanded they end        we had disscussions and talked about this alot but he always had the same answer  the basis of our relationship had never changed  i was just caught up on the whole in love thing   

the problem is the relationship was always like this from day go and i was happy with that untill a few months ago yet i still yern for it now, yet when i had it i couldnt

i guess the piont to my post is im curious has anybody ever gone thrugh this? does love change things? does a Master love his slave differently to how he could love a free woman?
is BDSM love diiferent to that of vannila?>

the way i can describe what it felt like is that my body and mind loved it  but in the end my heart was hurting      yet the nature and generally nothing in the relationship had ever changed.

i would really appricate O/others views on this
thanks
hunnibunni xoxox

Congratulations! You now know the difference between reality and fantasy.

_____________________________

Life Lesson #1

I'm not your type.
I'm not inflatable.


(in reply to hunnibunni09)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: different loves? - 5/17/2009 5:42:16 PM   
kazzaslave


Posts: 291
Joined: 12/12/2008
Status: offline
Greetings Des,

Yes absolutely her Master shouldn't have just left her lying there. On the subject of working long hours and then having to come home and do more such as preparing his dinner, kazza disagrees. This is exactly how it is as a Gorean slave which is what the OP states she is looking for in her profile. What the OP doesn't say is that she worked longer hours than her Master, in fact she started earlier and got home before he did. Her gripe was that he didn't clear away the breakfast things because he started later. It sounds like they didn't have a good conversation about expectations although she does say it went on a long time before she got upset.

As kazza stated in her last post this is how it is as the slave of a Gorean man and it's not for everyone. Clearly it's not for the OP and she should rethink what it is she wants.

she wishes you well,

kazza



_____________________________

I had no choice but to hear you ~Alanis Morrisette

All kazza's postings are approved by Master Malkinius

tsfka phoenix

Member of MoGa's In Crowd

Honorary member of the Fabulous Michigan Clique

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: different loves? - 5/17/2009 6:47:04 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Malkinius

You are right about one of the places where a slave's happiness comes from. But you are not completely right. A consensual slave's happiness comes from two places. The first is the act of serving others and second is the pleasure others get from her actions. Subs are happy when they get what they want even if it is abuse and pain. The difference is inner and outer directed happiness.

I said a slave's happiness doesn't matter. What she does matters. How pleased her owner is with her matters. Things can be done with and to her irregardless of whether a slave is happy about them or not. Commands are given not based on her happiness with them or their results or anything else about her. She...the person who is the slave doesn't matter if a command is given. She obeys or she doesn't. That matters. How she obeys matters as well.

You are right in that any owner who doesn't take into account the physical well being of his slave is stupid. The same goes for her mental well being as well. But, sometimes, especially when he wants to make a point, those things are ignored. Sometimes they may even be deliberately done so she will not be happy about it. The point is....when all is said and done....a slave's whishes, interests, happiness, etc. doesn't matter. What she is and does matters. What she is to her owner matters. That is the point of being property. You matter only in how you affect others. Anything else is just playing games that you can stop when it stops being fun.

Be well....

Malkinius



The fact is that someone does those things because THAT is what makes them happy.  They are fufilling THEIR DESIRE to serve and to obey.  THOSE THINGS make them happy.  If they didn't, they wouldn't CHOOSE to live that life, because we are all clear in the concept that someone CHOOSES to do this.  So if along the path they find out that doing so no longer makes them happy, they don't need to "suck it up", they haven't given up their choice to be happy.  Sometimes people grow and change and what they want and seek out of life might grow and change as well.  I'm not talking about a single event that a slave doesn't enjoy.  I'm talking about a slave finding themself in a situation that is no longer fufilling.  Should this happen and they choose to move on and find something more fufilling it doesn't mean they are playing a game.  This isn't a book or a story where the writer chooses the ending.  This is real live people who, regardless of the lifestyle ALWAYS have a choice when, after examining their situation, determine that it isn't working for them.  Quite frankly, the original "agreement" means nothing when that happens.  The people who are thinking otherwise are the ones who are playing a game and living in a fantasy. 

As for the OP, she is very young.  She admits this was her FIRST relationship.  Obviously, once she was living out what she THOUGHT she wanted, it wasn't making her happy.  It was her choice to leave.  It doesn't mean she was just playing a game.  It means that she is still learning and growing and figuring out what she wants.  I'm sorry (not really) but telling a 19 year old that they need to "suck it up" and since this is what she signed up for, basically "tough luck" is ridiculous.  Every single human being on this planet deserves happiness and we are lucky enough to live in a world where we are always free to seek that happiness.

Again, before anyone starts slamming me on what a "true slave" is....first they are a human being with needs.  Second they are doing this because it makes them happy.  Most importantly, I'm not talking about activities that may be required that they might not enjoy but are part and parcel of being a slave and you "grin and bear it."  I'm talking about finding yourself in a situation that the slave decides is no longer making them happy or fufilled, after giving it a good deal of thought and contemplation.  We all have things in life that we do that we would rather not, but they are part of life.  Perhaps the OP has discovered that being a Gorean slave, now that she has experienced it, isn't for her.  She is new and she is learning.  Now she is one step closer to knowing what she does want and need.  With luck, she will find it.  Because she isn't playing a game.  This is HER LIFE and she was no longer happy.  Regardless of the "unwritten rules", the freedom to leave always exists and it doesn't mean she is less because of it.

(in reply to Malkinius)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: different loves? - 5/17/2009 7:02:39 PM   
breatheasone


Posts: 4004
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Malkinius

Greetings sweetgirlseeks.....

quote:

ORIGINAL: sweetgirlseeks

quote:

ORIGINAL: Malkinius
If you become a slave, your happiness doesn't matter. What you want doesn't matter. What you want to do or don't want to do and when you do or don't want to do or not do it doesn't matter. You don't matter. When you are ready for that level of obedience and service, think hard about it then run like hell the other way. Only return to it if you can't do and be anything else. Otherwise you will be unhappy and will make other people unhappy.


Hello Malkinius,
Not to be argumentative, because I certainly respect your experience, etc... but the two statements that you made that I underlined above are a bit much I think.

If a girl is totally unhappy and is made to feel like she 'doesn't matter'... she will walk... unless she is totally lacking in self esteem.  
 
I did expect some sub or slave to say something about that. You are right, but that still doesn't change what I said. The reason why below.


quote:

I would rephrase it to say, if you are a slave, your happiness is primarily derived from your owner's happiness.  The primary thing that drives your own happiness and sense of value, is making your owner happy and knowing that he finds you pleasing and valuable in your service to him.       The slavegirl, i think, finds her true happiness in hearing 'good girl', seeing that smile on her owner's face and knowing in her heart that He finds her pleasing to Him.    Of course, if he is just 'some guy' and not a Man who inspires her to serve him fully with grace and fire, she will probably find herself perhaps content at best, but rather hollow and uninspired.  If the latter is the case, i can see where she might start looking to her own selfish needs for happiness.    That wouldn't be so much because she is not a slave, but perhaps, because she is serving the wrong Master for her.

~sgs

You are right about one of the places where a slave's happiness comes from. But you are not completely right. A consensual slave's happiness comes from two places. The first is the act of serving others and second is the pleasure others get from her actions. Subs are happy when they get what they want even if it is abuse and pain. The difference is inner and outer directed happiness.

I said a slave's happiness doesn't matter. What she does matters. How pleased her owner is with her matters. Things can be done with and to her irregardless of whether a slave is happy about them or not. Commands are given not based on her happiness with them or their results or anything else about her. She...the person who is the slave doesn't matter if a command is given. She obeys or she doesn't. That matters. How she obeys matters as well.

You are right in that any owner who doesn't take into account the physical well being of his slave is stupid. The same goes for her mental well being as well. But, sometimes, especially when he wants to make a point, those things are ignored. Sometimes they may even be deliberately done so she will not be happy about it. The point is....when all is said and done....a slave's whishes, interests, happiness, etc. doesn't matter. What she is and does matters. What she is to her owner matters. That is the point of being property. You matter only in how you affect others. Anything else is just playing games that you can stop when it stops being fun.

Be well....

Malkinius





Well i'm SO glad someone finally told me where MY happiness comes from ....i'd love to know your source for info on where consensual slave get there happiness.


_____________________________

Romans 10:13,For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Mike posts in black font
candy posts in pink font

(in reply to Malkinius)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: different loves? - 5/17/2009 7:20:44 PM   
sweetsub1957


Posts: 2201
Joined: 4/28/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomImus

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig
Well, I may get a little flack for this, but if you go calling yourself a slave, you really don't have much right to complain when you are treated like a slave, now do you?


This is a valid point but I think people fall in love with the imagery and then find that the reality is an eye opener. I may get a little flack for this but most submissives I have known are ready to submit as long as it is on their own terms.



Actually, i think E/everyone is ready to either Dominate or submit on T/their own terms, as the case may be.  DBSM is consensual power exchange and, no matter which end of the whip S/someone is on, T/they will enter that consensual relationship on T/their terms.  The days of capturing unwilling slaves are a thing of the past.....at least where i live they are.  The best way to avoid disagreements over what's okay and acceptable in a relationship is to discuss things and come to an agreement before entering said relationship.....no matter what Y/you call Y/yourself.

_____________________________

Member: Lance's Fag Hags.

"That's not just a chip on her shoulder, that's the whole potato!" ~Lady Angelika~

In lowering yourself to talking behind my back, you're perfectly positioned to kiss my ass.

An it harm none, do what ye wilt.

(in reply to DomImus)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: different loves? - 5/17/2009 9:10:36 PM   
dreamerdreaming


Posts: 2839
Status: offline
Rules and expectations should have been made clear from the start, so that you knew what you were getting into.

If the things that are happening now are not what you signed on for, you have the right to leave. Its called a "bait and switch". Its not fair for him to expect to be able to just change things how he wants to, making them different than your original agreement.

If you are not happy, dump him and move on with your life.

_____________________________

Download SLAVE LOVER. Explicit BDSM porn, with a plot! A love story, on a FemDom planet! http://www.amazon.com/Slave-Lover-Chronicles-Book-ebook/dp/B0031ERBLI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1261973416&sr=1

(in reply to hunnibunni09)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: different loves? - 5/17/2009 9:15:26 PM   
Malkinius


Posts: 1814
Joined: 1/9/2004
Status: offline
Greetings LafayetteLady....

I never said she didn't make the right choice to leave and that she was or should have been happy. She is still too inexperienced to know what will make her happy ten years down the road. I wanted to make the point that she is getting into something bigger than she knows and possibly than she can deal with. In all probability, her "Master" didn't have much of a clue what he was doing either. That is the most common situation as I have seen it. It usually causes problems unless the two are already a couple/married and they usually go back to a slightly kinky mundane life after trying it for a while.

Face it. Most people are not cut out to be a slave or to Master a slave. This is what Doms and subs are for. To go there when they want to then come back when it is no longer fun to play the game/the lifestyle/whatever you want to call what it is that they do. Too many people take on titles because it sounds good rather than because they have a clue what they do. Yes, it bugs those who do. I call them as I have seen them in practice. Yes, I have much higher standards than most. No, I don't cut people slack when it comes to being what they claim to be. And I really don't care if I insult or hurt someone's feelings if it keeps them out of much worse trouble and danger. It is better they be pissed at me than damaged or dead.

Be well.....

Malkinius



_____________________________

A questioner by inclination...An Auctioneer for the fun of it
http://www.HouseMalkinius.com    The goal is community.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: different loves? - 5/17/2009 9:30:53 PM   
lronitulstahp


Posts: 5392
Joined: 10/17/2007
Status: offline
quote:

is BDSM love diiferent to that of vannila?>

i have to answer this using my own personal experience.

When i was in vanilla relationships, my expectations and my emotions were more conventional. i practiced a sort of textbook Hollywood script-type romance. There were definitely really deep emotions involved, but a nagging emptiness. For me, in vanilla, the need to submit, and belong to my partner went unfulfilled. The void this left was one i could have lived without filling....but i still felt the space it left between a true spiritual connection with my beloved.

Now, i prefer to love with my head, and not just my heart. Still, my emotional center is involved. The difference is that now, i don't feel the sense of missing out on something. The puzzle is complete. For me, that almost tugging feeling that holds me mentally and spiritually to someone, that giving up of control while being guided and corrected when needed, that surety, peace and reliance; the all encompassing knowledge that i am His...this is love.

If you have certain natural proclivities and you aren't able to include them in a relationship, there will be a sense of longing, and naturally, a feeling that vanilla relationships are less than ideal for you. Vanilla folks, people without a need to submit, dominate, or participate in kink in a relationship, have the same capacity to love. They just happen to not need to express themselves in the same way. BDSM doesn't make us better or worse than vanillas at love, just different.




_____________________________

Truth is, everybody is going to hurt you; you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for." -Bob Marley

(in reply to hunnibunni09)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: different loves? - 5/17/2009 10:14:43 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Malkinius

Face it. Most people are not cut out to be a slave or to Master a slave. This is what Doms and subs are for. To go there when they want to then come back when it is no longer fun to play the game/the lifestyle/whatever you want to call what it is that they do. Too many people take on titles because it sounds good rather than because they have a clue what they do. Yes, it bugs those who do. I call them as I have seen them in practice. Yes, I have much higher standards than most. No, I don't cut people slack when it comes to being what they claim to be. And I really don't care if I insult or hurt someone's feelings if it keeps them out of much worse trouble and danger. It is better they be pissed at me than damaged or dead.

Be well.....

Malkinius




Which brings into play the ridiculous concept that there is "one, true, accepted" way of being any of those titles.  There isn't.  There is what the two people in the relationship find to be the "true" way for them.  The key, of course, is for those two people to meet and develop a relationship.  Yes, the Goreans have a series of book that apparently more clearly defines what everyone is.  But when real people are involved, you step out of the book and into reality.  The very idea that everyone else is simply playing a "game" is ludicrous.  Relationships that we read about in books (ALL FICTIONAL BOOKS) are rarely close to reality.  It doesn't matter whether it is the typical romance novel where love conquers all, or science fiction.  The people in the relationship define their roles in the way that works for them. 

Everyone always has a choice.  Do young people discover a curiousity and yearning and perhaps jump into this type of relationship far too quickly, only to find out that the reality falls far short of the fantasy?  Of course they do.  The problem only worsens when those poor inexperienced people come to these boards looking for advice and to learn more to be told they made a decision and now need to "suck it up" and deal with it.  Certainly sometimes a person will find out that they might define themselves differently than they originally planned, but never have they REALLY surrendered their choices.  The danger of "damage or death" comes from telling them that they have.  The danger is in trying to tell people that there is only one "true" way of doing things.  Of course you are free to hold people to YOUR definition of what the definitions are, but it doesn't make your definition right.  It only makes it right for you.  There are more than a few couples on here who identify themselves as being in M/s relationships that probably don't meet your "standard."  It doesn't make their relationship any less M/s, because it works for them.

Advising those people in a way that keeps them out of harm's way is not accomplished by telling them they defined themselves incorrectly.  It is accomplished with reminding them that regardless of how they identify, they are human beings with thoughts, feelings and hopefully some common sense and that just because they identify a certain way does NOT necessitate their surrender of any of those things.  Yet far too often that is exactly what so many inexperienced "slaves" are told.  They do not need to feel happy or fufilled.  "Master" is deciding their fate now and their only job is to "obey."  Again, they serve BECAUSE it makes them happy, BECAUSE it makes them fufilled.  They are happy when they make their master happy and fufilled, yes, but it is still done because that is what makes them happy.  No one enters into a consensual slavery dynamic because it will make "master" happy.  It is because making "master" happy is what makes them happy.  That is why slaves CHOOSE their masters.  If serving just anyone with total disregard for their own happiness was actually the way it worked....all those fools who contact women with the "on your knees bitch, I am now your master" emails would have more slaves they could handle because all of the slaves would instantly obey.  Those that kid themselves into thinking slaves serve just for the sake of serving are just fooling themselves.

(in reply to Malkinius)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: different loves? - 5/17/2009 10:51:45 PM   
breatheasone


Posts: 4004
Joined: 7/14/2007
Status: offline
HOLY SHIT LafayetteLady!... 

_____________________________

Romans 10:13,For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
Mike posts in black font
candy posts in pink font

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 1:03:35 AM   
Malkinius


Posts: 1814
Joined: 1/9/2004
Status: offline
Greetings LafayetteLady....

quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady
Which brings into play the ridiculous concept that there is "one, true, accepted" way of being any of those titles.  There isn't.  There is what the two people in the relationship find to be the "true" way for them.  The key, of course, is for those two people to meet and develop a relationship.  Yes, the Goreans have a series of book that apparently more clearly defines what everyone is.  But when real people are involved, you step out of the book and into reality.  The very idea that everyone else is simply playing a "game" is ludicrous.  Relationships that we read about in books (ALL FICTIONAL BOOKS) are rarely close to reality.  It doesn't matter whether it is the typical romance novel where love conquers all, or science fiction.  The people in the relationship define their roles in the way that works for them. 

You are right...up to a point. There is no "One True Way". BDSM is all about doing it your own way no matter how stupid...or not. It has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not something is based on a work of fiction. The only thing that makes something a work of fiction is that parts of it didn't really happen and are made up by the author. That doesn't change any underlying message in the work. I know you will have many people argue about your idea that all relationships in books are not close to reality....and no, don't get me started on romance novels, I don't read them with extreme prejudice.

quote:

Everyone always has a choice.  Do young people discover a curiousity and yearning and perhaps jump into this type of relationship far too quickly, only to find out that the reality falls far short of the fantasy?  Of course they do.  The problem only worsens when those poor inexperienced people come to these boards looking for advice and to learn more to be told they made a decision and now need to "suck it up" and deal with it.  Certainly sometimes a person will find out that they might define themselves differently than they originally planned, but never have they REALLY surrendered their choices.  The danger of "damage or death" comes from telling them that they have.  The danger is in trying to tell people that there is only one "true" way of doing things.  Of course you are free to hold people to YOUR definition of what the definitions are, but it doesn't make your definition right.  It only makes it right for you.  There are more than a few couples on here who identify themselves as being in M/s relationships that probably don't meet your "standard."  It doesn't make their relationship any less M/s, because it works for them.

I will take the risk of letting them think there is only one way to do something over damage and death any day. The repercussions are much less. Let me remind you of all the "BDSM Lifestylers" who pound the SSC and RACK and all the other acronyms they have come up with to keep people from being hurt and to sound to the mundane world like they are really not doing anything that anyone should object to. Then come back and talk to me about no "One True Way." I have heard and read the politically correct BDSM party line so many times I can quote it. One of the things that sets the Goreans who live it as a moral and ethical way of living apart from most of the BDSM world and anyone who is 'politically correct' is that we take responsibility for what we do. If I harm someone or let them come to harm on my watch, it is my responsibility. If I step into something it becomes my responsibility to give the best advice I have in a way it will be remembered.

quote:

Advising those people in a way that keeps them out of harm's way is not accomplished by telling them they defined themselves incorrectly.  It is accomplished with reminding them that regardless of how they identify, they are human beings with thoughts, feelings and hopefully some common sense and that just because they identify a certain way does NOT necessitate their surrender of any of those things.  Yet far too often that is exactly what so many inexperienced "slaves" are told.  They do not need to feel happy or fufilled.  "Master" is deciding their fate now and their only job is to "obey."  Again, they serve BECAUSE it makes them happy, BECAUSE it makes them fufilled.  They are happy when they make their master happy and fufilled, yes, but it is still done because that is what makes them happy.  No one enters into a consensual slavery dynamic because it will make "master" happy.  It is because making "master" happy is what makes them happy.  That is why slaves CHOOSE their masters.  If serving just anyone with total disregard for their own happiness was actually the way it worked....all those fools who contact women with the "on your knees bitch, I am now your master" emails would have more slaves they could handle because all of the slaves would instantly obey.  Those that kid themselves into thinking slaves serve just for the sake of serving are just fooling themselves.

You are missing the point of what is going on here, aren't you? Yes, the definition is important. It does reduce the amount of error and damage that happens to real people. Too much of the BDSM world plays fast and loose with everything. It is full of people who make everything up as they go along including themselves. Just take a look at the profiles here and look at all the people complaining about the fakes and frauds. The people who claim anything and everything and are never able to follow up on it. Yes, some people are very fulfilled out of making other people miserable or out of cheating and lying to them. NO, I do not accept what they do as being just fine because they are fulfilled by hurting others. No, their kink is not OK. The thing I and others here will remind you....and something I keep reminding myeself, is that no, things don't work the way we want them to most of the time and many times work in ways we don't expect or even think will fail.

You are right. We are mostly dealing with intelligent adults here. Most people see through the junk mail every female gets when she puts out a profile here. Perhaps the best thing about people who do that is that they don't learn, they just keep doing it in the hopes that some day it might work. The fact that it almost never does and they don't learn works in the would-be slaves/subs favor. It makes filtering them so much easier.

I do hate to tell you this, but yes, some to many slaves and some subs serve because of a need to serve. They don't do it out of love. They don't do it out of dominance. They do it because they must. I have owned such slaves. To think otherwise is to be as blind as the emailers you mentioned above.

Be well....

Malkinius



_____________________________

A questioner by inclination...An Auctioneer for the fun of it
http://www.HouseMalkinius.com    The goal is community.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 4:24:35 AM   
kazzaslave


Posts: 291
Joined: 12/12/2008
Status: offline
Greetings Mistress LafayetteLady,

With all due respect, you have no idea what drives all of us slaves to do what we do, specifically you don't know what drives kazza to need to serve at a man's feet. she doesn't just want to serve she needs to serve, is compelled to serve, without it she would be tremendously unhappy and unfulfilled. You knock Master Malkinius for saying there is only one true way and then do it yourself saying we serve merely because we want to. While it's true we serve a particular man because we want to, feel a connection to him, the need to serve doesn't disappear just because there isn't a man to serve at the moment.

kazza tried to turn her back on being a slave, it worked for a couple of weeks. The need was just too strong to ignore. So in a sense no she doesn't have a choice unless she wants to end up very, very unhappy and perhaps "damaged" from trying to deny what she is at her core - a slave in general, Gorean specifically. But no we aren't happy all the time noone is.  The fact is that just like everyone else there are times we aren't happy at all - but we stay. Not being happy and fulfilled at the moment isn't reason enough to leave, abuse is and that's entirely different.

Yes it's true that two people meet and decide what the slave's service will entail but the thing is that with Gorean slaves (and no she isn't saying we are better than non-Gorean slaves) is that we are expected to behave a certain way. To give one example, if a slave talks back to a Master or Mistress, that slave is put back in her place, she is expected to be respectful at all times no matter how she feels about that person. For example breathesasone's reply: "Well i'm SO glad someone finally told me where MY happiness comes from ....i'd love to know your source for info on where consensual slave get there happiness." would result in one hell of a lecture on how to behave, there is no way kazza would get away with saying such things. That doesn't make her behavior wrong, just not acceptable to us. The things a slave says and does reflects on her Master. So yes Gorean slaves are different - not better, not worse just different. We are held to a higher standard than most, again not better just different. If a Master is okay with his slave speaking as slaves such as breathesasone speaks that's great, no problem, it's just not slave as we define it.

Of course kazza has the right to leave if a particular relationship isn't working, noone is saying we don't. On the other hand, many give up when being a slave isn't fun anymore, just as many give up on a vanilla relationship when times get tough. Many have a fantasy vision of slavery and when the reality hits (coming home from work and then taking care of the household no matter how tired the slave is, getting up to make Master his coffee no matter how badly she slept the night before) it becomes too hard and they want to leave. kazza believes such people are submissives not slaves and certainly not Gorean slaves. Again that's fine, it doesn't make that person less of a person - just not slave and certainly not Gorean slave. We don't get to negotiate what we will and will not do, which is why a long conversation about what the Master expects of his slave before begging his collar is a very good idea. There is no contract signed, so the slave had better be clear on what she is getting herself into because from the time his collar is locked around her neck her only choice is to leave.

kazza is going to stop now, she has gone on long enough. she begs you to understand that she isn't saying you're 100% wrong, just that what you say doesn't cover what slavery is like for all slaves and to give you an idea of what slavery is like for kazza and Gorean slaves.

she wishes you well,

kazza


_____________________________

I had no choice but to hear you ~Alanis Morrisette

All kazza's postings are approved by Master Malkinius

tsfka phoenix

Member of MoGa's In Crowd

Honorary member of the Fabulous Michigan Clique

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 4:29:27 AM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Malkinius


You are right about one of the places where a slave's happiness comes from. But you are not completely right. A consensual slave's happiness comes from two places. The first is the act of serving others and second is the pleasure others get from her actions. Subs are happy when they get what they want even if it is abuse and pain. The difference is inner and outer directed happiness.

Not necessarily, I'm happy when I get what I need........I can get what I want perfectly easily without being owned. Inside this relationship I oftentimes do not get what I want.

I said a slave's happiness doesn't matter. What she does matters. How pleased her owner is with her matters. Things can be done with and to her irregardless of whether a slave is happy about them or not. Commands are given not based on her happiness with them or their results or anything else about her. She...the person who is the slave doesn't matter if a command is given. She obeys or she doesn't. That matters. How she obeys matters as well.

This simply isn't true of all Owner/owned relationships. I've been owned in a TPE relationship for years and what you're describing is ONE particular way of being part of a TPE dynamic.

You are right in that any owner who doesn't take into account the physical well being of his slave is stupid. The same goes for her mental well being as well. But, sometimes, especially when he wants to make a point, those things are ignored. Sometimes they may even be deliberately done so she will not be happy about it. The point is....when all is said and done....a slave's whishes, interests, happiness, etc. doesn't matter. What she is and does matters. What she is to her owner matters. That is the point of being property. You matter only in how you affect others. Anything else is just playing games that you can stop when it stops being fun.

I disagree. The point of being *property* is decided by the two people entering into the relationship. I do NOT matter ONLY in how I affect others. I matter as a person with my own wishes, interests and my own happiness. None of that was thrown out when I became owned, lock stock and barrel. None of those things are ever ignored when a point is being made, they are firmly in the front of his mind.

You make an assumption that to choose to be consentually owned means that your happiness comes from serving, and the pleasure others get from your actions. This isn't the case universally.

I chose to be owned for the direction and control I get in an amazing way from a supremely clever and skilled person. I get my happiness from the result of that. I do not have a serving nature, I do not derive my sole happiness from being *submissive*. I think of myself before I think of him, I am a selfish person.

You're creeping into the realms of defining what a *slave* IS, what she wants, what she needs and what she chose to be owned FOR. I live in exactly the same way with entirely different motives. It may not alter the nuts and bolts of what I have to do or how comfortable some of it is.

I have to obey, eventually, or I do not have a D/s relationship........I have to follow his direction , or I do not have a D/s relationship...I have to defer to his will, or I do not have a D/s relationship..........I have to accept that I gave him the right to have authority over me, or I do not have a D/s relationship.......but the reasons for doing so are not the ones you espouse.

No, *anything else* is not playing games....it might just be outside of your realm of experience.


Malkinius


agirl



(in reply to Malkinius)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 5:06:28 AM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kazzaslave

Greetings Mistress LafayetteLady,

With all due respect, you have no idea what drives all of us slaves to do what we do,
kazza



No-one knows what drives ANYONE else to*be a slave* or to be owned until they say so and describe it.  No matter how similar it appears, it's going to differ for everyone. That's just common-sense.

People stay in EVERY type of relationship there is, when they are unhappy......few  people expect to be *happy* at all times, with everything.....and they stay. They stay because they are being fulfilled in one way or another to whatever extent. Momentary unhappiness is rarely the reason for people buggering off. You have the same right to leave , as you pointed out, as anyone else.....*when things aren't working*. So when you and the man you're with can't make it work ...you leave .........just as most people do.

Nothing so different about Gorean slaves........ Your drive to *be* a Gorean slave to someone is tailored to being a Gorean slave to someone you're content with. If I spoke in a way that my owner thought was *out of order*, I'd get told in no uncertain terms too. That's the same for many people, not just Goreans.

agirl


< Message edited by agirl -- 5/18/2009 5:08:51 AM >

(in reply to kazzaslave)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 5:44:44 AM   
barelynangel


Posts: 6233
Status: offline
okay, i have been a Gorean slave - offline for 8 years prior to even finding online -- i have a bit of knowledge and experience of same. i know many women who actually live as Gorean slaves and let's dispell some myths okay? Many people who claim to know what it is to BE a Gorean's slave has never been one. So i suggest many people realize that many slaves who tell you what Gorean slavery is -- really have no clue what it is to BE an actual slave -- Gorean or not. I was a slave for 8 years and i sure didn't have thiis NEED to serve -- i guess i was doin' it wrong lol. The happiness of a Gorean slave varies as much as any other slave, if her needs *which many times are many) are fed, no matter what they are -- she is happy, when they are not -- she is not. Happiness is arbitrary and even Gorean slaves don't have a check list for what should and does make them happy.

Okay correct me if i am wrong, but kazza last i heard you have never actually been a slave offline, much less a Gorean one -- offline - though you have played one online yes? Last i heard you were finally going to get to experience it this summer of what it is to be a slave offline. Unless i missed something since you were phoenix. So you really have no clue either -- as you have stated to others. Serving and desire to serve and please does NOT make a Gorean slave or ANY slave --- hell many people in the world enjoy serving others and pleasing others -- its in their blood -- that doesn't mean they would thrive in slavery. Ownership and mastery of a MAN create Gorean slavery. Because of his views, beliefs, understandings etc, all of this create mindsets of the slave that help her in understanding how she exists in his life and within Men and subsequently FW because they are Free, its through his mastery she learns these mindsets that give her understanding. I say Gorean because i don't know others so that is what i am speaking with regard -- The Gorean part comes from the Man and if you take that away -- it really isn't any different from other slaveries -- the MAN defines how a woman is held based upon his perceptions, outlooks, mindsets etc. Snd you will see his influence of what he believes in his slave.

Umm, the fact that you believe there is a difference between a Gorean slave and slaves in general, tells me you still have a lot to learn as to what a Gorean slave is. Gorean slavery is not about what the slave believes is slavery in general -- its not defined by the slave -- its because of who the Man is. So in all actuality when you become a slave, the definition won't and SHOULDN'T matter to you because you don't define what your slavery is. Your duty is to obey, not decide if he is expecting the correct things from you based on what you believe Gorean slavery should be.

Sorry but Gorean slaves are not saints -- they stay because of the mastery -- not out of the goodness of their hearts when a guy is incapable of holding them. This is what gets many in trouble because they stay based on their label instead of the actuality of the situation. What you describe is a concept of self-determination and Gorean slaves at the very least have none. So if they decide to stay because of the label, they are in fact doing what FW do-- determining what they will do.

Your explanation of Gorean slavery kazza is a concept of facade and the fantasy. Sorry but ACTUAL slavery entails a lot more than women skipping around with an ultimate desire to serve.

quote:

Gorean slaves (and no she isn't saying we are better than non-Gorean slaves) is that we are expected to behave a certain way. To give one example, if a slave talks back to a Master or Mistress, that slave is put back in her place, she is expected to be respectful at all times no matter how she feels about that person. For example breathesasone's reply: "Well i'm SO glad someone finally told me where MY happiness comes from ....i'd love to know your source for info on where consensual slave get there happiness." would result in one hell of a lecture on how to behave, there is no way kazza would get away with saying such things. That doesn't make her behavior wrong, just not acceptable to us. The things a slave says and does reflects on her Master. So yes Gorean slaves are different - not better, not worse just different. We are held to a higher standard than most, again not better just different. If a Master is okay with his slave speaking as slaves such as breathesasone speaks that's great, no problem, it's just not slave as we define it.


I don't know who you are trying to impress here but this paragraph is BS, kazza. Who is us who is we? I know Malkinius didn't teach you this also because while i do know how he views slaves, i have never seen him remotely act as if Gorean slaves are some fantasy concept of perfection or some higher standard of slavery other slaveries do not have. And your post here to a Mistress IF you want to get technical is NOT something a Gorean slave would do ESPECIALLY since a Free person responded to her prior -- so if you really want to get into what Gorean slaves DO, you really should not be throwing stones at others or self-righteously attempting to explain with your nose in the air what Gorean slaves woudn't do. Just an example of course.

Let's speak of Gorean slavery --- Gorean slavery is based upon MASTERY -- while there are women who seek it out because of the idea of pleasing and serving which is, if you read the books, NOT the staple of what makes her a Gorean slave, the mastery and ownership of a Man does. The serving and need to please comes from how a woman is kept by a Gorean Man. Service and pleasing -- as it is in MANY slaveries -- is an expectation and standard a Man has of his slaves. These concepts are many times individually defined. When i was a slave to my Master -- i RARELY did domestic work, i worked outside the home because he allowed it because he knew i enjoyed it, he had someone else do much of the domestic work in the home. The choice was his, not mine. He didn't want an exhausted slave. That is the concept many seem to miss -- the decisions are the Man's if he wishes to allow his slave to lay around eating bon bons and only get up to fuck him, and she is mastered by him, she is still his slave -- IF he identifies as Gorean , she is thus a Gorean slave.

What many people don't see when they observe Gorean slavery -- which is why a lot of confusion abounds, is that mastery is usually at play with regard to the slave. Its the invisible chain so to speak. What she does and her happiness because of the mastery and enslavement teaches the mindset that she exists for his pleasure -- and she does. This is where the idea of her happiness doesn't matter comes in (many times without further explanation). Because of how she is held, a woman who is a slave to a Gorean man exists in his life for his pleasure. She doesn't PUT his pleasure before her own -- that would be self-detrmineation -- she learns the mindset that his pleasure comes before her own. Subtle but significant difference in my opinion. The concept of she cannot leave comes from - - NOT that she keeps herself or he keeps her in chains and such -- but because of his mastery of her. Mastery is a powerful thing and many times, when a slave and yes they do get there and sometimes do say it -- imagine that Gorean slaves aren't perfect lol -- fuck this i am outta here. And they could very well start walking to the door, however, they realize in the end, they can't leave because his hold on her through his mastery. However, when that mastery doesn't exist or is gone -- walking out the door is something SHE SHOULD DO, if she can. (That's where that statement comes from many freak out about). Its not abuse or what not, its simple mastery that holds her. Its also what keeps her as slave when things suck.

When i was a Gorean slave, i screwed up a lot according to what i see that is "supposed" to be Gorean slavery lol. I said no, i swore at my Master, i threw tantrums, i wasn't always obedient etc etc etc. grins, i did all sorts of things people online say isn't "being" a Gorean slave, yet still i was. I have also always stated if i had learned what Gorean sslavery was supposed to be lol from online -- i would have never become one.

To me, the mistake people make with regard to Gorean slavery is that the woman who wants to be a slave tries to decide what it is and should be -- that is always her first and biggest mistake.

What kazza is expressing however not clearly is the concept of social slavery that Gorean slaves exist within. In Gor there is a concept of social slavery -- wherein, if you are a slave there are standards and expectations you are required to follow because of your social status while among Free. There is also the idea that any Free can correct a slave when she is among them. This all stems from the social status of slaves versus the Free. This is also why so many people misinterpret the actuality of a slave (i.e., the behind the scenes idea). The social observance many times leads to the idea of slaves are perfect. This is soo not true lol. They screw up, disobey, they yell at times, they fight their slavery, they don't always skip around happy to be serving and pleasing, they think the Man at times is crazy, they think things are unfair, and some days they could care less if the Man is pleased. She gets discipline and consequences from her master. They at times fight or have disagreements. Mastery is not linear, its a process and this process works to dispell her free mind to create the slave mindsets a woman exists within. And its OKAY!

I wasn't going to step in here but there is enough myths about Gorean slavery and the biggest one is that Gorean slaves serve because they NEED TOO as a personality trait -- for some yes, for many others no. This concept is a misinterpretation that comes from the books. If you read the books there are instances wherein a woman finally realizes her slavery and she usually does this before Men and there are statements such as needing to serve them and please them. if you read when this happens however, its a SEXUAL understanding. She exists for the PLEASURE of Men. While this takes many forms within slavery, the main concept this speaks to is she exists for his sexual pleasure in all ways, her beauty because of how she is kept as slave is for Men. If you read the books, you will see FW also enjoy and many times live to serve and please Men however theirs is not an open and fully sexual aspect of all Men. So no, the serving and pleasing people see in the books doesn't mean simply a need to do this with people in general -- its very specific. What many don't see because they don't really read is the mastery that has come before this revalation of the slave.

While its true for a few, just like many slaveries -- you have all type of women and needs of women who are involved with Gorean men and being slaves of same. I am by far a perfect example of a woman who actually WAS a Gorean slave for 8 years to a Man, i am by far one of the least service oriented women you will find. I don't serve women if i can help it, and some Men can get their own beer lol. However, i respond and react to the Alpha Man as slave, when i am owned by own, his expectations and standards guide me which means i may very well find pleasure in serving others because of HIM as my Master. However, mastery of a Man is capable of a lot and within a Man's mastery serving him and obeying him are all a liive and well, however, take the mastery away and you no longer have the slavery.

The desire to serve and please -- does help, don't get me wrong, but its not the staple that make Gorean slaves Gorean slaves. To me, the women who hold themselves in slavery because of this need they state they have are more subs than slaves because they are determining what their slavery is, instead of the Man doing so. Gorean slaves are as multitude in personality, in achievements and disappointments, abilities and non, just as many slaves outside of Gorean slaves do. what makes it Gorean slavery is the Man who owns her. Gorean men master and hold their slaves in slavery based on their beliefs and understandings of the world around then as Gorean Men. This is way to complicated to set out as a specific of THIS IS Gorean slavery. There are things many people know isn't a Gorean outlook of a slave mindset, which is why you have people, myself included explaining that what they understand us not Gorean slave mentality or mindset. I am one of those people who can explain it more so than just say it isn't so. Many people cannot they simply parrot what they see other say and that is where the Gorean slavery is better than such and such comes from -- the lack of explanation of where the mindsets come from. And the misquoting of quote meanings from the books.

People are welcome to take or leave this information, it really doesn't matter to me one way or the other. Many try and make Gorean slavery into a concept that it really isn't, and the social expectations help create this facade of actuality. Slaves are women who are owned by Gorean Men. They screw up, they don't live to serve and please all the time, they at times want to give up and sometimes DO, hwoever, what they focus on to get them through is not some needs to please but the Man, the Man whose strength and mastery holds them in the place they find themselves most able to exhale and simply be.

angel



< Message edited by barelynangel -- 5/18/2009 6:23:24 AM >


_____________________________


What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
R.W. Emerson


(in reply to kazzaslave)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 8:31:59 AM   
barelynangel


Posts: 6233
Status: offline
Hi Malkinius, you and i have agreed and disagreed on many things over the years.  I understand what you are saying but in reading your words i think you and others are attempting to be way to specific as to what creates happiness in a slave and i can only say Gorean slave because that's what i know.  Its not that simple.  I really do not believe the sole concept of slavery for a woman and her happiness within same is simply the happiness of the Man, i don't believe MOST Gorean slaves really care much about the pleasure others find in them (a select few -- yes -- others as a whole -- no), and i don't believe for MOST Gorean slaves its a concept of serving others as a whole.   Many people misunderstand the concept of Gorean slavery and believe its based on women who simply love serving every tom, dick, and harry or every jane, martha, or maud.   This isn't true.  In the books the legalities of slavery helped hold women to the social expectations of their status among Free.  Because of the consequences this entailed, the women who were slaves better had damn well serve eagerly and try and not displease ALL Free.  Now, in our way of practicing the slavery, the MAN who is a woman's master is the one who holds her in slavery -- him alone, no help from the law etc., which means that as he masters and enslaves a woman to reach and maintain his expectatoin and standards which come from many times his identity as a Gorean Man (as we all know this involves a lot more explanation as to why), she is also trained in how to exist as a SOCIAL status of slave among Free.  This social status of being a slave among Free also includes there are certain understandings of her place as a slave among Free, there are certain things that are frowned upon etc, and the ideal concept of she should strive to please everyone as a slave (which we all know is an impossibility).  Her happiness is a concept of things that far more indepth as her needs are met (some she never even realized she had), her mindsets are altered or solidified because of his hold on her in slavery etc.   RARELY, does her happiness have anything to do with OTHERS, and is many times solely focused on her Master because of his mastery and what it allows her to do -- exhale and be.  Slaves seek specific Men and become slaves of specific Men for reasons that far outweight her needs (which not all women who are Gorean slaves have in abundance) to serve and please others.  That is a myth.  Some do, some don't.  But even the ones that do, don't become actual slaves to just any tom, dick, or harry -- if your assessment was an absolute, they would and they would serve happily and be fulled by serving ANYONE, versus specific Men as their Masters whom they seek.

I agree however, on your explanation of her happiness etc doesn't matter -- grins, but i think i do simply because i understand what it means.   To most people it would seem that Gorean Men could care less about having a happy well adjusted slave, they are spoiled selfish and completely inconsiderate to their slaves and make decisions soley on their WANTS.  This as you pointed out is not true.  A Man who is Gorean makes determinatoin for his home.  He is not guided by what his slave believes she wants to be happy.  His mastery of her and the subsequent mindsets that she learns helps her accept that she exists in his life for HIS PLEASURE.  Yes, MUCH of Gorean slavery is based on sex and sexuality and a woman being pleasure for a Man sexually.   The rest many times is imply filling in the gaps.  As you read in the books -- this concept is where the idea of "serving" and "pleasing" comes in, because quite simply -- FW also enjoyed serving and pleasing Men so the idea of that is what makes someone a slave is contradicted as there were more FW than slaves on Gor.  a slave has a duty, her duty is obedience.  And that everything else is a concept of what he allows her.  Therefore, many times if you speak to a slave at the beginning of her slavery and then years down the road, you will almost seem like you were speaking with two different women as to her understanding of her slavery.   Its not that her happiness doesn't matter but as her slavery progresses, her place as a slave becomes more defined and since she exists for the pleasure of her Master, her needs and expectations etc of what she believes would make her happy -- alter.  She doesn't PUT the Man before herself, she doesn't allow his pleasure before her own (slaves are in many ways too selfish for this), however, she learns her place as a slave, she learns how she exists in his life.  And she learns that HE as her Master will make the best decision for his home -- whether or not, its something that makes her happy all depends in his determinations.  As far as i know, Gorean Men don't make determinations for their homes strictly on his slave happiness or unhappiness, he makes his decisions for his home (which include the girl) based on what HE determines is best for his home.  Some days this will be something she wants, other days not so much, and even other days his determinations will piss her off or make her think he has lost his mind.   The point is however. his mastery of her will maintain her place that she exists even through those "oh fuck this" or "have you lost your mind" or "this isn't going to end well" moments.  Her happiness many times is a complex concept of existing in his mastery because that is her security because her value to him maintains the status quo of Him keeping her.   Sorry, but if someone tries and defines why a slave is happy in her chains -- more than likely they will get it wrong on some level -- not because its wrong but becuase its not complete and is only part of the whole that creates the happiness a slave thrives in even on the days she wants to kick him in the shin for being such a block head.

Many people try and use specific actions of disobedience as what defines a slave in Gor -- its not true, it simply makes her a disobedient slave.  If she maintains disobedience then the Man has to determine if his cost of keeping her is worth the value she has to him.   His mastery also plays a huge role in how well she adjusts to mindsets it teaches her as a slave among Men.

I do understand what you are trying to get across, but i don't agree with what you are saying so to speak.

angel

< Message edited by barelynangel -- 5/18/2009 9:19:58 AM >


_____________________________


What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
R.W. Emerson


(in reply to agirl)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 10:45:03 AM   
IrishMist


Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

While it's true we serve a particular man because we want to, feel a connection to him, the need to serve doesn't disappear just because there isn't a man to serve at the moment.

THAT is nicely said Miss Kazza

as to the OP...obviously you fucked up...suck it up and move on

_____________________________

If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.


(in reply to kazzaslave)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 11:46:13 AM   
sweetgirlseeks


Posts: 131
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kazzaslave

Greetings Des,

Yes absolutely her Master shouldn't have just left her lying there. On the subject of working long hours and then having to come home and do more such as preparing his dinner, kazza disagrees. This is exactly how it is as a Gorean slave which is what the OP states she is looking for in her profile. What the OP doesn't say is that she worked longer hours than her Master, in fact she started earlier and got home before he did. Her gripe was that he didn't clear away the breakfast things because he started later. It sounds like they didn't have a good conversation about expectations although she does say it went on a long time before she got upset.

As kazza stated in her last post this is how it is as the slave of a Gorean man and it's not for everyone. Clearly it's not for the OP and she should rethink what it is she wants.

she wishes you well,

kazza


Hi kazza-
I think you need to be careful  when you say that anything is exactly how it is for a Gorean slave.   First, looking at a quote from the books that a Gorean Man just shared on the Gorean board a couple of days ago...


"There is much for a girl to do," I pointed out. "She keeps his compartments. She dusts and cleans. When they do not use the public kitchens she must cook for him. If he does not wish to take advantage of the public laundries, she must do his washing and ironing. She shops for him, and bargains in the markets, and so on. There is much for her to do."
"Does it take long to clean compartments?" she asked.
"Only a few moments," I admitted. "Goreans live simply, and do not much approve of cumbersome furniture."
"It does not sound to me like the slave girl is overburdened with domestic labors," she said.
"I suppose, objectively, she is not," I said. "Still, there are things for her to do."
"Is she as occupied as the wife of Earth?" asked the girl.
"Of course not," I said. "That would be foolish. The wife of Earth is, from the Gorean point of view, much overworked. When the husband returns home she is often, actually,

Beasts of Gor [Gor Series Book 12]
by John Norman
409
engaged in labors. How can she greet him properly? At night, so numerous and excessive have been her labors, she is often exhausted. That would be preposterous from the Gorean point of view. The Gorean master does not buy a girl with the primary objective of obtaining a domestic servant but with the intention of acquiring a marvelous slave. He wants the girl to be a wonder to him. He is quite cheerful about the sacrifice of domestic servitude in order to obtain what is far more important to him. When he returns to his compartments he does not want to find a worn chore woman there but a lovely slave, fresh, vital, eager and fully alive, kneeling before him, waiting to be commanded."
"What does the girl do in her free time?" asked Audrey.
"Much what she pleases," I said. "She will have friends among other slaves. She walks, she visits. She exercises, she reads. Within limits she does what she wants to do."
"Can she work outside the compartments?" asked Audrey.
"If it is permitted by the master," I said, "and it does not in any way compromise her slavery."


Secondly, I appreciate your point that Gorean slaves, typically, are not just sitting around in silks waiting to be fucked and played with... but that being said, some Gorean men may actually keep their girls in such a way that they are able to relax and enjoy life and therefore, be more energized in their service to Him both sexually and otherwise.  

Sincerely,
~sgs

< Message edited by sweetgirlseeks -- 5/18/2009 11:51:05 AM >

(in reply to kazzaslave)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 1:27:21 PM   
kazzaslave


Posts: 291
Joined: 12/12/2008
Status: offline
Greetings agirl

"No-one knows what drives ANYONE else to*be a slave* or to be owned until they say so and describe it.  No matter how similar it appears, it's going to differ for everyone. That's just common-sense."

On this point we agree, which is what kazza was trying to get across in her message to Mistress LafayetteLady.

"People stay in EVERY type of relationship there is, when they are unhappy......few  people expect to be *happy* at all times, with everything.....and they stay. They stay because they are being fulfilled in one way or another to whatever extent. Momentary unhappiness is rarely the reason for people buggering off. You have the same right to leave , as you pointed out, as anyone else.....*when things aren't working*. So when you and the man you're with can't make it work ...you leave .........just as most people do."

Again, agreed *smiles* The point kazza was trying to get across is that there are many who give up when the going gets tough. They encounter resistance, say "this is too haaaard" and leave. It's easier to just throw in the towel instead of working things out, she sees this (as she said) in vanilla relationships as well as M/s ones. The astronomical divorce rate tells that story.

"Nothing so different about Gorean slaves........ Your drive to *be* a Gorean slave to someone is tailored to being a Gorean slave to someone you're content with. If I spoke in a way that my owner thought was *out of order*, I'd get told in no uncertain terms too. That's the same for many people, not just Goreans."

If kazza implied that having to be respectful to the non-slave types is exclusively the domain of a Gorean slave, she apologises, it's not what she meant at all. she knows well that there are non-Gorean slaves who must be respectful at all times. she also didn't mean to imply that Gorean slaves are a breed above all others, we aren't. kazza suspects that you and she are of the same mindset and have a whole lot in common, in fact when kazza reads your posts she more often than not nods in agreement with you. The point she was trying to make is that she sees many here who get away with addressing the M-types in a way NO Gorean slave would get away with....not all non-Gorean slaves behave this disrespectfully but many do. These are the slaves kazza was addressing. To kazza - and this is her view only - that public disrespect denotes submissive or non-Gorean slave who have far more freedom to express what they feel towards an M-type in public than kazza and her fellow Gorean slaves do. Then again maybe that s-type is told off in private but she has yet to see such a person apologise for their behaviour.

she wishes you well,

kazza


< Message edited by kazzaslave -- 5/18/2009 1:28:45 PM >


_____________________________

I had no choice but to hear you ~Alanis Morrisette

All kazza's postings are approved by Master Malkinius

tsfka phoenix

Member of MoGa's In Crowd

Honorary member of the Fabulous Michigan Clique

(in reply to agirl)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: different loves? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.188