Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: different loves?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: different loves? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 1:55:47 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Malkinius

You are right...up to a point. There is no "One True Way". BDSM is all about doing it your own way no matter how stupid...or not. It has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not something is based on a work of fiction. The only thing that makes something a work of fiction is that parts of it didn't really happen and are made up by the author. That doesn't change any underlying message in the work. I know you will have many people argue about your idea that all relationships in books are not close to reality....and no, don't get me started on romance novels, I don't read them with extreme prejudice.


Actually, while a work of fiction may have historical realities, it is fiction because the characters didn't exist.  All works of fiction do not contain a "message."  That is an argument for symbolism in literature and really has no place on this thread.  I chose romance novels for no other reasons than the main characters always end up together in the end.

quote:


I will take the risk of letting them think there is only one way to do something over damage and death any day. The repercussions are much less. Let me remind you of all the "BDSM Lifestylers" who pound the SSC and RACK and all the other acronyms they have come up with to keep people from being hurt and to sound to the mundane world like they are really not doing anything that anyone should object to. Then come back and talk to me about no "One True Way." I have heard and read the politically correct BDSM party line so many times I can quote it. One of the things that sets the Goreans who live it as a moral and ethical way of living apart from most of the BDSM world and anyone who is 'politically correct' is that we take responsibility for what we do. If I harm someone or let them come to harm on my watch, it is my responsibility. If I step into something it becomes my responsibility to give the best advice I have in a way it will be remembered.


Your predjudice goes far beyond romance novels.  If you honestly believe that Goreans are the only ones who take responsibilites for their actions or have cornered the market in the "moral and ethical" way of living, I'm sorry but you really should get out more and see the world around you.  There are more people on this board who are NOT Gorean who are probably have more morals and ethics than you could ever hope to achieve.  Insulting the community "at large" with the concept that you are better than everyone else is typically what turns people off of Gor to begin with and no, I do not intend to get into an argument over how Gor is truly such a wonderful thing if only the rest of us would open our minds to learn about it.  You don't like romance novels, I don't like science fiction.  By the way, in case you ever missed it, for those of us who also follow the bible, we learned ethics, morals and responsibility as well.

AS far as SSC and RACK are concerned they extend into all areas, including Gor and are based in the concept of not engaging in activities without knowing the potential positives and/or negatives of the activity.  At no time have you ever given a single example of how making someone think there is one "true" way has protected them from damage or death.  I would be interested to hear exactly how you might have achieved such a thing.

quote:


You are missing the point of what is going on here, aren't you?


No, I haven't missed the point at all. 

quote:

Yes, the definition is important. It does reduce the amount of error and damage that happens to real people.


The definition does nothing to reduce the amount of damage that happens to real people.  The definition is, whether you like it or not, a flluid thing that changes for the individuals involved.  It is the people using their common sense, while often diminished due to an uncontrollable desire that protects them from damage. 

quote:

Too much of the BDSM world plays fast and loose with everything. It is full of people who make everything up as they go along including themselves.

 
I hate to break it to you, and I know that Goreans believe they aren't part of "our" world, but you are, and it has been my experience that they tend to play a lot looser than others. 

quote:


Just take a look at the profiles here and look at all the people complaining about the fakes and frauds. The people who claim anything and everything and are never able to follow up on it.


Yet, you are here jumping right on the "fake and fraud" bandwagon.  Do you think people here are so stupid and ignorant that we won't recognize it if you put it in different terms? 

quote:


I do hate to tell you this, but yes, some to many slaves and some subs serve because of a need to serve. They don't do it out of love. They don't do it out of dominance. They do it because they must. I have owned such slaves. To think otherwise is to be as blind as the emailers you mentioned above.


They MUST because it is what makes them HAPPY.  I really don't understand what part of that is unclear to you.  They MUST serve because it is what fufills them.  YOU as having been their owner are nothing more than the means to their fufillment.  This is not saying that they didn't sometimes perform acts for you that they wouldn't enjoy or choose.  And to be clear, I never said they did it out of "love."  I said, that their serving was done because it is what is fufilling to them and gives them happiness.  Someone doesn't CHOOSE to serve because you are a dominant, they CHOOSE because it gives them happiness.  I guess in your world, all the slaves who are serving are unhappy and serving because someone else told them to do it.  In the real world, you get prison time for that.  Oh yea, and many of those serving another are in a loving, fulfiiling for both parties relationship.  They are happy.  They are, by all accounts lucky because each found the one that was right for them.  But in the end, they all CHOSE to do it for their own personal, selfish reasons...their own happiness and fufillment.  If that isn't the reason that they are serving, if it doesn't fufill them, they are in need of help and not the kind that "perfect Mr. Wonderful Master" is ever going to be able to provide.

Be well....

Malkinius



(in reply to Malkinius)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 1:58:00 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: breatheasone

HOLY SHIT LafayetteLady!... 



(in reply to breatheasone)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 2:06:50 PM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
kazza, I know and quite a few Gorean slaves and let's use the Gorean term, kajira, shall we seeing you are setting your self up as a expert on Gorean slavery, I have even owned kajiri and trained kajiri when I was in the US and sold one girl I trained to one of my Giorean Mentors. (Money did change hands but legally it was for my time and efforts in training the girl). Most of these girls are not on line to my knowledge and have no interest on sites as this or role play in which I gather you have some conciderable experience. As both Malkinius and barelynangel have stated quite emphatically that Gorean Slevery is based totally on Mastery. That no Gorean Master worth his salt would put up with a slave remaining with him out of the kindness of her heart, disobedience or manipulation is incontrovertible. In fact I don't know a kajira who would stay with a Master who was unable to Master her. A kajira expects, needs and wants (from all I have seen and found in conversations with them, a man who is a Man and is Man enough to master them, keep them in strict disclpline and be a Man of his word. I agree that many are justy not cut out for that type of M/s dynamic and that is good too for in the final analysis all are free to find their own level.  What you fail to point out is that Gorean slavery is service based and not BDSM based just as slavery uin a Victorian Home is service based. personally I simply changed lables and protocols when I left the Gorean Lifestyle and any slave  collar for my home is and will be trained as I trained Gorean slaves.



_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to kazzaslave)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 2:15:19 PM   
Prinsexx


Posts: 4584
Joined: 8/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hunnibunni09

does a Master love his slave differently to how he could love a free woman?


Yes. Absolutely. And this slave is grateful for that.


_____________________________

Owner of asterion

Metawhore.... the sound of a metaphore when gagged
Free woman
Resident thread finisher
To my stalker:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LN2lP_7J7GI&feature=fvwrel

(in reply to hunnibunni09)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 4:12:32 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

kazza, I know and quite a few Gorean slaves and let's use the Gorean term, kajira, shall we seeing you are setting your self up as a expert on Gorean slavery, I have even owned kajiri and trained kajiri when I was in the US and sold one girl I trained to one of my Giorean Mentors. (Money did change hands but legally it was for my time and efforts in training the girl). Most of these girls are not on line to my knowledge and have no interest on sites as this or role play in which I gather you have some conciderable experience. As both Malkinius and barelynangel have stated quite emphatically that Gorean Slevery is based totally on Mastery. That no Gorean Master worth his salt would put up with a slave remaining with him out of the kindness of her heart, disobedience or manipulation is incontrovertible. In fact I don't know a kajira who would stay with a Master who was unable to Master her. A kajira expects, needs and wants (from all I have seen and found in conversations with them, a man who is a Man and is Man enough to master them, keep them in strict disclpline and be a Man of his word. I agree that many are justy not cut out for that type of M/s dynamic and that is good too for in the final analysis all are free to find their own level.  What you fail to point out is that Gorean slavery is service based and not BDSM based just as slavery uin a Victorian Home is service based. personally I simply changed lables and protocols when I left the Gorean Lifestyle and any slave  collar for my home is and will be trained as I trained Gorean slaves.



The reason behind the choice remains the same.  Because it fufills that slave and makes them happy.  It doesn't matter whether there is sex involved or whether it is BDSM oriented.  That slave does it because of the fufillment and happiness they get from serving another.  And just as an aside, if at any time sexual fufillment is given or withdrawn as part of the "rules", if piercing of the genitalia or nipples, even the requirement of nudity for your "viewing pleasure" bumps you right into the world of BDSM, or at the very least "kinky sex," and at that time the "service only" idea goes right out the window.  So if part of the "service" a slave provides is orally pleasuring her master, don't try to say it isn't a sexual situation. 

I don't deny that there are those who make the choice that love will not play a part in the situation.  I am saying that no matter what that slave still gets into it for their own personal satisfaction, otherwise they wouldn't be there.  What "spin" you choose to put on the situation does not change the reality.

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 5:32:39 PM   
agirl


Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004
Status: offline
Just a couple of points in response, kazza.......

I wouldn't (hopefully) be rude or disrespectful to ANYONE on the forum, regardless of whether they were a master, sub or tourist and it's not because I'm owned. It's nothing to do with my owner that I try to behave with some sort of decorum in an online forum. It's not *becoming* to ME to gob off, here or anywhere else.(I probably HAVE on occasion,though; I've been here long enough to have let myself down).

I've certainly had some spirited debates, conversations and discussions in here and upset a few people in the process. That's par for the course in this type of arena. I have the freedom to BE and express the person he owns. He's not oblivious to my thoughts and views , nor the way I express them. I don't NEED to be monitored.  He reads what I post sometimes and might say * Ok, that was a bit strong* or * Maybe you should pull your horns in a bit there, I don't think they meant what you think they did* ...or * You could have expressed THAT a bit better, my dear!*.etc.


Your point about *people giving up when the going gets tough*..Well yes, it takes all sorts and all sorts of *tough*. Having been divorced myself .....I know what kind of *tough* prompted me to decide that I wasn't going to stay. A good man, didn't work for him or me. No mud, no nastiness, no abuse..... just wasn't right for either of us. Sometimes it's sensible to call it a day for no other reason than the relationship doesn't hold enough to carry both through.

I don't know anything much about Gorean slaves or Gorean masters, apart from the views of a few people that post here regularly..... I rarely am in much disagreement with their views , funnily enough. They are often very close to way my relationship operates.

agirl








(in reply to kazzaslave)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 5:51:39 PM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

The reason behind the choice remains the same.  Because it fufills that slave and makes them happy.  It doesn't matter whether there is sex involved or whether it is BDSM oriented.  That slave does it because of the fufillment and happiness they get from serving another.  And just as an aside, if at any time sexual fufillment is given or withdrawn as part of the "rules", if piercing of the genitalia or nipples, even the requirement of nudity for your "viewing pleasure" bumps you right into the world of BDSM, or at the very least "kinky sex," and at that time the "service only" idea goes right out the window.  So if part of the "service" a slave provides is orally pleasuring her master, don't try to say it isn't a sexual situation. 

I don't deny that there are those who make the choice that love will not play a part in the situation.  I am saying that no matter what that slave still gets into it for their own personal satisfaction, otherwise they wouldn't be there.  What "spin" you choose to put on the situation does not change the reality.


Actually here you are not quite correct. Sex becoming part of the dynamic has nothing to do with BDSM but may, depending how it is used, be considered as kinky sex especially is some form of bondage is involved. However, being in a poli relationship it would be normal to involve any female members including slaves in sex such as taking one when cleaning and bending her over a table and just taking her. Not remotely BDSM or even kinky just healthy lust.. I respectfully suggest you revisit the meanings of BDSM and Kink.. However you are quite correct in saying, the girls and boys for that matter are there because the want to be there and stay because the dynamic is fulfilling a need.


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 6:24:33 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear

quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

The reason behind the choice remains the same.  Because it fufills that slave and makes them happy.  It doesn't matter whether there is sex involved or whether it is BDSM oriented.  That slave does it because of the fufillment and happiness they get from serving another.  And just as an aside, if at any time sexual fufillment is given or withdrawn as part of the "rules", if piercing of the genitalia or nipples, even the requirement of nudity for your "viewing pleasure" bumps you right into the world of BDSM, or at the very least "kinky sex," and at that time the "service only" idea goes right out the window.  So if part of the "service" a slave provides is orally pleasuring her master, don't try to say it isn't a sexual situation. 

I don't deny that there are those who make the choice that love will not play a part in the situation.  I am saying that no matter what that slave still gets into it for their own personal satisfaction, otherwise they wouldn't be there.  What "spin" you choose to put on the situation does not change the reality.


Actually here you are not quite correct. Sex becoming part of the dynamic has nothing to do with BDSM but may, depending how it is used, be considered as kinky sex especially is some form of bondage is involved. However, being in a poli relationship it would be normal to involve any female members including slaves in sex such as taking one when cleaning and bending her over a table and just taking her. Not remotely BDSM or even kinky just healthy lust.. I respectfully suggest you revisit the meanings of BDSM and Kink.. However you are quite correct in saying, the girls and boys for that matter are there because the want to be there and stay because the dynamic is fulfilling a need.



IronBear,

We have had discussions when I first came here and had a different (geographically based) screen name.  Then and now, I have much respect for you and what you have to say.  Today is probably NOT the best day for me to post as I did have a minor procedure involving sedation and so I may not be as clear as I normally would be.  Having said that....

I think we can agree that when that "lust" takes over, they are not simply a "service" slave.  I am well aware of what BDSM means in the literal sense, and probably shouldn't use that term.  "Kink" on the other hand has a wide variety of definitions, most of which stem from anything that mainstream society is not partaking in (i.e. oral and anal sex are quite mainstream and rarely considered "kinky" anymore, while swinging definately is).  In any case, you can't say that something is "service oriented" only and then attach sex to it and say that it is still "service only."  It just doesn't fly.  Again, I'm not talking about subs/slaves who enter into what they call "service" situations where a part of the "service" is of a sexual nature.   For instance:  "No strings housework"....if someone is looking for the literal sense of the term, they expect to clean your house for no pay, possibly not even a "thank you, good boy/girl", they clean your house and leave.  On the other hand, if the "no strings housework" is defined as cleaning the house naked with clamps on your nipples, a butt plug and CBT, it now has become a sexual activity.

It's the "you came here as a slave, and you no longer have a choice" mentality when tried to be used in the way of intimidating someone to believe they have given up the choice to leave that needs to be corrected each and every time it appears.  Because the one thing that no slave ever gives up is their choice to stay or leave.  While it is something you would never do, I'm sure you are aware of the reality that it happens and shouldn't.  It is instilling that mentality into a slave (especially the new ones) that causes them to come to these boards in confusion.  They have been told they must blindly obey because now they are a slave, yet their "gut" tells them that can't be the case because who would do this if they were so unhappy about it.  I don't advocate running for the hills because she had a bad day.  But if after some time passes, communication has failed and one is still unhappy, some people need to be reminded that they have not really given up their freedom to the point of no return.

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 7:16:26 PM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady
It's the "you came here as a slave, and you no longer have a choice" mentality when tried to be used in the way of intimidating someone to believe they have given up the choice to leave that needs to be corrected each and every time it appears.  Because the one thing that no slave ever gives up is their choice to stay or leave.  While it is something you would never do, I'm sure you are aware of the reality that it happens and shouldn't.  It is instilling that mentality into a slave (especially the new ones) that causes them to come to these boards in confusion.  They have been told they must blindly obey because now they are a slave, yet their "gut" tells them that can't be the case because who would do this if they were so unhappy about it.  I don't advocate running for the hills because she had a bad day.  But if after some time passes, communication has failed and one is still unhappy, some people need to be reminded that they have not really given up their freedom to the point of no return.


How can I fault this? I advocate much the same. This is why I insist on a minimum probationary period before a slave is given, with full ceremony, her full House Collar. I want her to see how we are and how we operate. if me getting up in the morning and not having a hot short black coffee in the first couple of minutes is more akin to waking a Grizzly from hibernation. Sure I'll get it myself half the time if I arise early but you get the picture.  If however a slave asks why she has to do something, I see it as a silly question and thus slave will be told: "Because it pleases me!" or "Because I told you to!" Seeing that mostly I explain the reason for things I want done except the glaringly obvious I don't see any issues there. Regarding service slaves, In most cases I know of they are not signed on as service only but their primary task is service (usually domestic service). When looking at a girl I will as part of my discussions evaluate and find her thoughts of the possible inclusion of both sex and BDSM play. I am equally happy to have a strict service only slave if she meets my primary requirements with additional prized skills and or experience too. E,G a girl trained in and experienced in service in an upper class/aristocratic home in England or who has experience in silver service at a high level of competency. Such gems are rare and could be snapped up immediately. I believe everything should be in the open and laid out from the start. If the girl later chooses to ask to be allowed to be includes in extraneous activities such as sex and/or BDSM, that is well and good. Similarly iof a slave askes to be excludes in some extraneous activities this will be considered and discussed with her. Result she will be excluded or released if needs be (unlikely but may happen).


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 7:46:53 PM   
greenearth21


Posts: 228
Joined: 7/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hunnibunni09

DARKSTEVEN

well we both worked full time i would return an hour before he was due hoem and would start preparing whta he would have previously told me he had wanted for dinner while having to clear up from breakfast that morning and do other daily chores  mop,sweep,clean etc etc    but the ffact atht doesnt be due into work for 9am while i am in at 7am   he had made no effort in clearing up and it ws there ofr me to tend before preparing the next meal. i was ok with this untill recntly  it wasnt just that tho it was the whole picture,


*thinx: oh hell no* 

_____________________________

“Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else's opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation.” Oscar Wilde (1854 - 1900)

(in reply to hunnibunni09)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 7:57:46 PM   
peppermint


Posts: 5170
Joined: 10/18/2005
From: Montana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Malkinius

You may be better off sticking to being a sub and enjoying some dominance and bedroom play but otherwise living a normal, mundane life.


I rather resent what you've said here.  I am a submissive and my submission has nothing to do with dominance and play in the bedroom.  In fact, our sex life is really rather vanilla.  It's the rest of the day where our Dominant/submissive dynamic takes place. 

Are you one of those people who believes that submissives just haven't learned to go up a notch and become a slave?



(in reply to Malkinius)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 9:44:12 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
IronBear,

While I doubt we will ever agree on how sexual activity changes the dynamic, we really are of very similar beliefs.  I think the problem evolves from the lack of dignity and respect that you you exude with every word you write.  I don't think I have ever seen you once belittle someone's concept of being a slave or sub because it didn't follow "your" way of doing things.  It is a very admirable trait.  So at this point, because of the respect I do have for you, let's just admit that we agree the OP would be justified in leaving and wish her luck in the future finding someone more suited to her.  If she chooses to continue her quest in the Gorean "arena", I would advise that she check out your posts and learn about that area quite a bit more before continuing to pursue it. 

P.S.  I'm guessing by your current picture that your health has greatly improved from when we talked in the past, and I'm happy to hear it.  If you would like to contact me on the other side, I will be happy to "remind" you of my other screen name where we talked.

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: different loves? - 5/18/2009 9:45:41 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: peppermint

quote:

ORIGINAL: Malkinius

You may be better off sticking to being a sub and enjoying some dominance and bedroom play but otherwise living a normal, mundane life.


I rather resent what you've said here.  I am a submissive and my submission has nothing to do with dominance and play in the bedroom.  In fact, our sex life is really rather vanilla.  It's the rest of the day where our Dominant/submissive dynamic takes place. 

Are you one of those people who believes that submissives just haven't learned to go up a notch and become a slave?



Apparently, the rest of us are also just "playing a game." 

(in reply to peppermint)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: different loves? - 5/19/2009 6:20:19 AM   
IrishMist


Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Apparently, the rest of us are also just "playing a game."

Hmm....You think 'he's' just playing a game
He thinks you are just playing a game.

Does anyone else see a pattern here?

Everyone does things their own way. You want him to accept that your way is just as viable as his way; well...I would think that to do that, you would have to at least make an attempt to accept that his way is just as viable.

No one has to agree that one way is better than the other; you should however at least make an attempt to accept that everyone, including Goreans; have the right to do things THEIR way just as you have the right to do things YOUR way.



_____________________________

If I said something to offend you, please tell me what it was so that I can say it again later.


(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: different loves? - 5/19/2009 6:35:13 AM   
LATEXBABY64


Posts: 2107
Joined: 4/8/2004
Status: offline
How to love is importnat on how to be apart of someone   I see the honeymoon period of like having a new car you get use to it and break it in try it out  after awhile you either love the car or get rid of it  if you love the car you take car of it  just like loving aperson you nurture and work at it  love is about taking care of us and the person we are with 

(in reply to IrishMist)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: different loves? - 5/19/2009 9:32:35 AM   
missturbation


Posts: 8290
Joined: 2/12/2006
From: another planet
Status: offline
~FR~
 
quote:

but while in the relationship i just couldnt understand how he could love yet treat me and act the way he did   such as not allowing me somehwere, refusing permssion to do something, speak 2 me in a certain manner and left evreything such as chores and cooking to me  never helped out once  the fights would end where he demanded they end        we had disscussions and talked about this alot but he always had the same answer  the basis of our relationship had never changed  i was just caught up on the whole in love thing   

 
Sometimes my Sir does this things for exactly the reason you seem to be saying your Sir didn't. If Sir says i can't go somewhere he has good reason, if he says i can't do something it is probably because he thinks its a wrong action and he refuses it because he cares.
 


_____________________________

What you don't witness with your eyes, don't witness with your mouth. Proverb.

If it fit's in a toaster, i can cook it.

Buying 10 item's or less is not shopping !!

(in reply to hunnibunni09)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: different loves? - 5/19/2009 10:32:09 AM   
peppermint


Posts: 5170
Joined: 10/18/2005
From: Montana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IrishMist

Hmm....You think 'he's' just playing a game
He thinks you are just playing a game.


In her short comment LafayetteLady never said nor inferred that the writer is playing a game.  She, as I did, just commented on what seems to be his idea that those who are merely submissives are just playing (and a step below slaves) while slaves are the real true thing. 




(in reply to IrishMist)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: different loves? - 5/19/2009 1:30:29 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: IrishMist

quote:

Apparently, the rest of us are also just "playing a game."

Hmm....You think 'he's' just playing a game
He thinks you are just playing a game.

Does anyone else see a pattern here?

Everyone does things their own way. You want him to accept that your way is just as viable as his way; well...I would think that to do that, you would have to at least make an attempt to accept that his way is just as viable.

No one has to agree that one way is better than the other; you should however at least make an attempt to accept that everyone, including Goreans; have the right to do things THEIR way just as you have the right to do things YOUR way.



I have never said that Goreans don't have the right to do things THEIR way.  I fully support their right to do so.  However, when they come out and make the bold statement that everyone is just "playing a game" because it isn't THEIR way, that is a different story altogether.  Further, when people make the all encompassing statement that one no longer has any choice once they submit to being a slave, I have to question whether they are truly living in reality.  They are a slave only for as long as they CHOOSE to be one.  It is the one thing that no one can ever take from them regardless of agreements or protocol. 

MY POINT if you were following the posts is that there are many, many couples here who identify themselves as being in an M/s relationship that doesn't follow the rules of Gor and to state they are "playing a game" because it doesn't follow HIS beliefs is pompous and ignorant.  He also implied that the rest of us (which would include you by the way) are lacking in morals and ethics by comparison.  Not once did I say that being Gorean was "wrong."  I have and will continue to state that the choice to leave ALWAYS exists, and that every single slave, Gorean or not makes the choice to be a slave because it is fufilling to THEM, not because someone told them to be so.

(in reply to IrishMist)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: different loves? - 5/19/2009 3:26:22 PM   
lateralist1


Posts: 886
Joined: 11/22/2006
Status: offline
My only advice is to learn to be who you want to be not who anyone else wants you to be.
Then if you wish to, try to find another person who loves you as you are.
A lot of women have had no option in the past but to be the slaves of men.
Perhaps things at last are changing.
We all make mistakes. Hopefully we learn from them and eventually move on.
I can master another human being but I would prefer that they become their own master and give to me what they freely wish to.
The idea that we can all leave relationships that don't make us happy is rediculous.
The priveledged few can. A lot don't have anywhere to go.
What is the definition of a good housekeeper? The person who keeps the house after the divorce.

(in reply to LafayetteLady)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: different loves? - 5/19/2009 10:33:49 PM   
LafayetteLady


Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Northern New Jersey
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lateralist1

The idea that we can all leave relationships that don't make us happy is rediculous.
The priveledged few can. A lot don't have anywhere to go.


Staying in a bad relationship where you are miserable is never a good idea.  The idea that you can leave is far from ridiculous.  There are so many abused women who leave with no where to go because it is what is necessary for their safety.  Saying you have no where to go is an excuse and a cop out.  But it a problem that starts when a person (usually a woman) lives only for her man's happiness and becomes "unmarketable" in the working world.  Everyone should have the courage and foresight to make sure that they can care for themselves.  Not just because relationships end, but because people die.  In both cases, a person can find themselve without means of support because someone else was doing it all their lives.

The idea that one must be "priveledged" to be able to leave is ludicrous.  But I guess it all comes down to how much you value yourself and whether or not you think you are deserving of happiness.  I'm not saying it is ever a simple, easy decision.  In fact, I think before ending ANY relationship, a great deal of thought should go into the decision.  But if the bad outweighs the good, and there isn't a way to change that balance, staying and being miserable isn't worth it.

(in reply to lateralist1)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: different loves? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109