CreativeDominant
Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: justme1980 Ok, let me see if I can say this right: If a Dom requires a sub to beg, is he saying that it is ok for the sub to put their needs before his? ????? He MIGHT be but there could be a whole lot of reasons for it: 1. He is telling her that in order to get her needs (wants, desires, etc.) met, she is going to have to beg for him to do so thus establishing the concept that she wants but cannot get on her own without asking him first. This helps to firm up the idea that he is in control of her wants/needs/desires because as has been noted, he can always say "No", no matter how hard she begs. 2. He might be a dominant sadist whose first priority is that establishment within her of his control of the satisfaction of her wants/needs./desires. Once that is established and emphasized with each time she begs, there is the enjoyment for the sadist of watching his submissive...especially if she has a difficult time of doing so...beg for something. Sometimes, the most fun is derived when it is the most basic thing possible that she has to beg for. 3. He might be a sadistic dominant for whom the pleasure of her pain/humiliation/befuddlement of having to beg is immense and only heightened by the control yielded by her asking for what she wants/needs/desires. Note that in these examples, control is held by the dominant unless of course, he is one who has fooled himself into thinking he has control but who, in always granting her request, has ceded that control quote:
Does it send a message that says "I will allow you to beg, manipulate, take my power, and otherwise control a certain situation " Thoughts, comments? Manipulation and taking of power only happen when the submissive has learned that some dominants are laboring under the delusion that it is the doing of the act itself that is important. For those dominants who understand that begging isn't always just a cute act or playful but a way to participate in power exchange IF recognized by both parties as such, there is no manipulation occurring UNLESS the submissive is using her knowledge of even this type of dominant to achieve her goals. At that point, I suppose it could be argued that she is being manipulative but I would think that the bigger argument could be made for her not being submissive but either pandering to what she knows of his ways or surreptitiously, and full awareness, usurping of his control.
|