LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
The Criminal Mind on BBC Radio 4 today reports on whether criminals should be held responsible - or whether their behaviour is the inevitable consequence of neglect, abuse and even poor diet in infancy, leading to subnormal brain development and function. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00j6lh9 This means that no one is born criminal as phrenology might have had it (amongst other theories), but simultaneously condemns the offspring, who will inherit through environmental influence from the parents such tendencies, should the parents have suffered the requisite origin in a home full of neglect, abuse and poor nutrition, for many times the victim becomes the perpetrator. This raises some interesting questions - should the "damaged" be allowed to raise children, if its clear that their upbringing is likely to produce societal problems in the future as that damage is passed on? Should the criminal be anticipated by way of brain scans that show the underdevelopment of the brain, with the consequent removal of rights for potential perpetrators for the benefit of the rights of potential victims? Should the criminal be held responsible and punished, or should their inadequacies be treated so as to effect a cure - rehabilitation at its finest, should it be possible? Should the victim understand that the criminal is not responsible, and rather feel sympathy than a need for vengeance or recompense? Is that even possible? E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|