RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


rulemylife -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 2:31:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

Then we are in agreement and should apologize to me for being unresponsive. Why, if the question was posed in the present, should there be response to a post pointing to five months from now, or a hope that the positive trend is just lagging by two months. Why respond to agreement that today - NOTHING is being stimulated or is trending positive? When two months go by and the lag catches up - we can revisit. How long is long enough? The Administration is projecting out pretty far for self fulfilling prophecy. It seems they are going to require a LONG time. So long in fact, I think they are representing themselves as a hypochondriac who has "I told you I was sick!" on their tombstone.

Regarding you not having any answer to what can be pointed to today as being stimulated in the other thread - why respond when I was pleased to observe your agreement concerning the present?



I really didn't understand any of that.

So again I'll ask, how can you point to, or even expect, a positive trend to develop in so short a time frame?

The policies being implemented are designed to correct problems that began as far back as the Carter administration, and will take years, not weeks, to work.

We have had a little over five months here, with certain economic indicators lagging by several months, so how do you establish a trend on that basis?




Loki45 -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 2:32:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
I am in 100%, uncompromising, total agreement with the VP! You interpret that as showing "partisan hatred"?


Here again we see that you have problems with your reading comprehension. I said your reference to the summer reading and them having no clue is your partisan hatred. The VP made no such comment. He simply said they misread how bad the economy was. That's it.

So once more, for review:
"We misread how bad the economy was." -- Biden

"The Administration misread, is misreading, and has no remedial summer reading course which can save them." -- Your partisan hatred twisting things around.

Clear?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
Just because you aren't interested in why, or what was so wrong with their after election interpretation; doesn't mean I should follow your example of burying my head in the sand, and saying "oh - good!"


Here we just have you misunderstanding things. I'm not burying my head in anything. I'm simply not trying to put a more negative spin on things like you seem to be doing. BIDEN came out and said they made an error. When did anyone in the last administration admit ANYTHING? Even when the WMD's were proven to not be there, they blamed the CIA. So it seems you just have an issue with the current administration. They can do no right in your eyes. Save time and admit that now.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
I don't hate reality, I simply observe it and comment. I must also have the VP problem. What exactly was shown to me trending toward positive today?


If you can seriously ask that question after all the answers you've been receiving (and ignoring) you should really just let it drop. You're never going to drink, no matter how many times we lead you to water.




SilverMark -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 2:36:34 PM)

I do not disagree with Biden, much as it has been bashed, in a Keynesian economic model the stimulus was too little and Congress would have cut it back no matter what Obama would have proposed. We all seem to lose the facts that economies recover slowly and that there is no "miracle cure". In a regional perspective there is growth, and I will not bore you with 8000 links but, certainly could if it would change anyone's mind...(we all know it will not!) To look for the answers you want Merc as far as growth or change in the economy a large number of economists( oh boy...if they agree we may be in more trouble than we thought) say that about a growth of about 1.5% by the end of the year is realistic. I would add that the "stimulus projects" have started here in Atlanta and throughout a good portion of Georgia so hopefully that will indeed put some of the contractors back to work. I look for no miracles from the President after all he is stuck with Congress and unfortunately for those of my affiliation his biggest stumbling block are not the Republicans(although they aren't any help) but from our own party and the lack of vision that the Congressional Democrats suffer from. What we have wanted we now in some ways regret....I have a great deal of faith in Obama and little in Congress....I have adopted my friend Merc's approach....throw them all out!!!...including my own party members!....I am beginning to think that 50 senators and a uni-cameral legislature would be MUCH better!!!!!....




Loki45 -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 2:39:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
An appropriate rebuttal: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=recession+will+NOT+end+2009&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=


LoL

Nice try. Now read each of those links. Only a small handful were actually saying that the recession won't end. The rest thought it would. Nice try though, really.  I got a good laugh out of it.

I wouldn't trouble you with re-googling it.....I know what it took for you to make that scant effort. So I took the libery of copying it for you (don't say I never did you a favor).
    IMF: Recession Will Not End In 2009 - Talk Radio News ServiceIMF: Recession Will Not End In 2009. Posted by Staff on April 22, 2009 |. Jonathan Bronstein, Talk Radio News Service. The dreary, Washington, D.C. weather ...

    Will the recession end in 2009? - BloggingStocksWill the recession end in 2009? Posted May 27th 2009 11:20AM by Mark Fightmaster ... The government is in debt and will not have the revenue to pay the ...

    Has the recession finally ended? - Jun. 19, 2009Jun 19, 2009 ... Talkback: Is the recession over? If so, why do you think that's the case? If not, when will it finally end? Leave your comments at the ...

    When the recession will really end - Top Stocks Blog - MSN MoneyWhen the recession will really end. Posted Jun 16 2009, 02:40 PM by Catherine .... If regulation does not inhibit the speculators from driving up prices, ...

    The Recession Will EndNot Until 2011! | RecessionwireRecessionwire is a user's guide to the recession, a pop-up site featuring recession news, work and job-hunting advice, personal finance and ...

    Ex-NBER Feldstein: Recession may not end in 2009 | Markets ...Jan 4, 2009 ... Ex-NBER Feldstein: Recession may not end in 2009 ... We will be lucky to see the recession end in 2009," Feldstein, former president of the ...

    [PDF]The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2009 to 2019 TestimonyFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
    2009, making it the longest recession since World War II. ..... end of 2008. CBO anticipates that housing starts will not ...
    www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=9958&type=1 - Similar

    Bernanke: Recession Should End in 2009, 2010 "Will Be A Year Of ...Bernanke: Recession Should End in 2009, 2010 "Will Be A Year Of Recovery" ... The law does not provide that the taxpayers are to bail out troubled banks. ...
    www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/.../bernanke-recession-should_n_169440.html - Cached - Similar

    The Hill Blog» Blog Archive » We will not end recession until we ...We will not end recession until we restart American manufacturing (Rep. Don Manzullo). June 2nd, 2009. Americans bought 16 million vehicles in 2007, ...
    blog.thehill.com/2009/.../we-will-not-end-recession-until-we-restart-american-manufacturing-rep-don-manzullo/ - Cached - Similar

    Bernanke: Recession May End in 2009 if Banks Stabilize - Political ...Mar 15, 2009 ... WASHINGTON -- America's recession "probably" will end this year if the government ... and working normally, we're not going to see recovery. ...
    www.foxnews.com/.../2009/.../bernanke-recession-end-banks-stabilize/ - Cached - Similar
Now then, let's count, shall we? Links 1, 5 and 6 indicate, to some extent the point you thought you were trying to make. Links 2, 3, and 4 are asking a question about the recession's possible 2009 end. And the remaining links are either a financial calendar or blogs about how we can end the recession by the end of this year.




Mercnbeth -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 3:24:54 PM)

quote:

To look for the answers you want Merc as far as growth or change in the economy a large number of economists( oh boy...if they agree we may be in more trouble than we thought) say that about a growth of about 1.5% by the end of the year is realistic.
Just so it can be noted that I said it - I hope the majority are right. Many in the google search provided qualified their assessment as being 'best case'; but hoping for the best is no crime, as long as you've considered and have planned for the worse case.

It's the worst case that I draw upon the most knowledge - California. It represents the US in hopeless partisan politics. The other problem is there is too much reliance on Federal money filling the gap for decreasing tax revenue. The most difficult thing to witness it the lack of consideration to the result of the most recent, and largest, tax increase by this or any State as occurred earlier this year. The tax rate when up - the tax revenue went down! The legislators seem to be ignoring that and want to once again increase taxes! Amazing, unless taken in the context of special interest PAC money being thrown around Sacramento from public employee unions and their enablers. The only region in CA thriving is Humboldt County - google that region to find out what is the basis of their economy. (Hint - it is NOT the State University)

My disconnect of understanding is how can the State, or Federal, legislators not allow cuts to the bureaucracy and public employee union entitlements? The populous IS willing to sacrifice, they (and I) would be even more willing if the sacrifice wasn't required to come unilaterally by the private business sector, and their employees. I know sacred cows are permitted to walk the streets of India while people are starving, but when did CA and the county in general adopt that religion when it comes to bureaucrats and programs during times like these?

quote:

I have adopted my friend Merc's approach....throw them all out!!!...including my own party members!....I am beginning to think that 50 senators and a uni-cameral legislature would be MUCH better!!!!!....


Hell Mark, I appreciate that! Glad to have another member in the 'None-Of-The-Above' party! (lol)

Without any spin - voting 'no' at each and every opportunity until change occurs is the only solution. Maybe if that's done, but the time President Obama comes up - we'll both be ready to vote 'YES!'. Hell, I'd sure welcome the opportunity, even if it does come via an international absentee ballot! It's been a long time since I voted yes for any incumbent.

There was a tangent discussion over the weekend regarding the point you raise regarding the economy. We came at a crossroad of disagreement when my position was that, unlike past US history, it would be nearly impossible to create the next auto industry, or even the next 'Dot-Com' boom. Regulations and special interests, along with taxes, NIMBY, and political correctness present an environment where too many hurdles exist. The counter point was, by definition, we couldn't 'see' the next big (fill in the blank) boom, anymore than we could see over the horizon of Henry Ford, or Bill Gates respective garages. So far, the 'green movement' jobs do not support the wages of displaced auto workers, or the mid-management jobs within the dot-com industries. Stipulating a time factor reference in the words "so far". Neither of us were so positive to state in absolute certainty they they will or won't. Bio-technology was what he was hanging his hat on to take us out of this, but the idea of people living to 120 because they could go to K-Mart and pick out a new 'farm raised' kidney or heart was more scary to me than the prospect of relying on the current Congress to curtail spending.

The differences between me and my soon to be practicing attorney friend may be a matter of perspective. Me in my 50's ready to cash in and retire to Italy; he, just getting ready to hang his shingle after earning his JD. He is starting out at square one on the game of life; I'm happy and content to observe not needing the economy to turn around to justify the time and expense of my education. Were I, I'd be as afraid as he is, and most likely have the same 'faith based' belief that 'something' will happen to turn around the current economic climate.




CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 3:27:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

~FR~

I am in agreement with Tim/MusicMystery. The fiscal problems have actually been going on for a great long while, and I mean before Bush II. The behavior of Americans have contributed to this as well. Both things will have to change, to be able to actually approach in any manner that will have a long lasting effect.


I agree, Orion. I remember growing up, and my dad explaining to me how "credit" was basically a handout -- and when the dollars came to dimes, it would be collected back, with absolutely NO thought for the human being on the other end, at a level twice or three times the original 'loan'. I remember him explaining how the money in his pocket was 'covered' by gold, sitting in Fort Knox, until our government wanted to spend more than the gold we had would cover -- so instead of scaling back their spending, they took us off the gold standard.

Now, when I screwed our finances up this badly at MY house, we lived on beans, rice, and whatever I could haul out of my container garden for MONTHS before I could get my ass out of the fire. The thing is, getting this country's economic screw-up squared away is going to take time and it is going to HURT... and we aren't hurting yet. In fact, I don't think that folks today would survive that kind of hurt. Shoot, more than half my daughter's graduating class in high school couldn't prepare a meal that didn't come pre-mixed and ready to put in the microwave. They haven't got a -clue- about farming or preserving food, making a meal from basic ingredients, stretching a dollar through frugal decision-making.

I'm living tight right now. I'm determined that I'm going to have every last drop of the debt I accumulated in my ignorance paid off. Not -written- off... but PAID off. Yeah, I know they're screwing me up the ass with the interest rates -- but you know what, I was dumb enough to ignore the obvious mathematical reality, so yeah, I promised it and I'm paying. But nowadays, I'm living within my means, and some months, that royally SUCKS! However, in the end it means that chances are pretty good that I won't have a crappy last couple of decades of life, eating cat food and wearing re-sewn bedspreads, and hopefully, if you include donating my body to science and skipping that whole expensive funeral thing, I'll die not owing anyone a -damned- cent.

So what do you think it will take to get our country to start living within ITs means? Do you think we're doing -anything- right? Where would you trim and fiddle to get us squared away? Curious minds want to know.

For me, the first things I would do would be:


  • Provide universal health insurance. A population with good medical care is healthier, more productive, and more creative. I would pay for it with a combination of increased individual taxes (probably by converting Medicare and its taxation system) and 'pleasure taxes' on cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana (yes, even medical marijuana), junk food, and prostitution, etc.
  • Eliminate the "War on Drugs" and the "War on Prostitution". Clear recreational drug users and prostitutes out of the prisons, and out of our court system. Decriminalize, regulate, and tax 'pleasure substances' including tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, sugar, white flour, sex workers, and junk food etc., to assist in funding universal health care.
  • Make college and trade-school FREE. Restore home economics, music, art, literature, and trades education to our schools. If we want innovation and creativity, we have to nurture it in our kids. Instead of parking them in front of the Nintendo, make them stretch their minds.
  • Fund the above through -charging- for education in the lower grades thru high-school. Give parents the option of using State-regulated schools, private schools, or homeschools, and have a set curriculum cost and resource sharing (like labs, pools, etc), regardless of which option or combination of options the parents pay for. Teach parents to value their child's education as something they are PAYING for, and expand the curriculum so that students who are academically oriented are thoroughly challenged, and children who are trades-oriented have the opportunity to learn a skill that will give them a good direction to start their lives. I'd lay wager that our 'dropout rate' would diminish, and more of our kids would actually start contributing to progress in our communities, instead of hanging out at the arcade or the convenience store making trouble. Ditch the expensive "teach to the test" system now in place. Reduce waste in the bureaucratic end of education.
  • Restructure our military. Pull our troops off foreign soil and take a good, hard look at who is profiting and who is benefiting for EACH and EVERY military campaign, tool, or process we have out there... Decide what the HECK our national security goals ARE... then decide how to use the tools we already -have- to meet those national security goals. Stop worrying about who a soldier loves, and make the most of the men and women who choose to lay their lives on the line to protect our country. Evaluate their LEADERS, and make sure that those leaders understand both what our goals are, and are equipped mentally, physically, and provisionally to MEET those goals.
  • Ditch the Farm Bill. Start over, and screw paying people not to grow food or to grow food unsustainably. Encourage local markets, heirloom varietal food production, and food diversity. Eliminate the FDA -- they're too understaffed to do a good job anyway. Encourage local governments to develop food safety programs that are managed within the immediate economy and geared to the way local food is produced. Teach home economics in our schools again, so that these kids know what to DO with real food (I bet a bunch of our kids don't even know what food group 'corn on the cob' belongs in!!!). Encourage Farmer's Markets, local food production, small, local food production companies, and artisan eats.
  • Restore our national rail service, and get the doggone thing back (if you'll pardon the pun) on track for both passenger and commercial use. Pay for it with a tax on multi-axle vehicles, based on the weight of goods being shipped on our national highway system. Our roads are too expensive to fix in many places anyway. More than half the bridges in the US need major repairs. We need to get commercial vehicles off the roads, and provide viable alternatives to driving and flying so that families can get out and travel again.
  • Change to a 35 hour work-week, with guaranteed 6-week-minimum vacations, and unlimited sick days with doctor confirmation of illness. Yes, I know it sounds like a dichotomy, but American's work too much. They've lost their zest for life and their creativity, and depressed people don't support their economy. They buy themselves into the poorhouse with things they can't afford, but that does not generate the flow of MONEY... it generates the flow of strangling, life-sucking debt... and so we sink, ever deeper, into the mire with no hope to get out, no time for joy, too many hours spent in absolute drudgery, and a complete loss of creative, innovative, brilliant minds... and in the meantime, our best -leave-.


Yes, our current government reps may have misinterpreted what they were seeing, though how they could have is beyond me, when even an economic midget like myself could see this coming 15 years ago... but, giving the benefit of the doubt... I still think that our government, no matter how well intentioned, isn't going to be able to fix this on their own. They've had bad habits for FAR too long, and the leeches are too well entrenched over every inch of the corpus gubernationus. If we want this fixed, we're going to have to haul ourselves up by the bootstraps and tell them what the hell to do (and not do), and figure out what we need to do to spank them when they screw it up, instead of sitting in our living rooms and bitching. (and yes, I've already done my share of writing, calling, and writing, and calling, and parking on the steps of my supposed representatives' offices).

Dame Calla




Mercnbeth -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 3:49:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
Then we are in agreement and should apologize to me for being unresponsive. Why, if the question was posed in the present, should there be response to a post pointing to five months from now, or a hope that the positive trend is just lagging by two months. Why respond to agreement that today - NOTHING is being stimulated or is trending positive? When two months go by and the lag catches up - we can revisit. How long is long enough? The Administration is projecting out pretty far for self fulfilling prophecy. It seems they are going to require a LONG time. So long in fact, I think they are representing themselves as a hypochondriac who has "I told you I was sick!" on their tombstone.

Regarding you not having any answer to what can be pointed to today as being stimulated in the other thread - why respond when I was pleased to observe your agreement concerning the present?


I really didn't understand any of that.

So again I'll ask, how can you point to, or even expect, a positive trend to develop in so short a time frame?

The policies being implemented are designed to correct problems that began as far back as the Carter administration, and will take years, not weeks, to work.

We have had a little over five months here, with certain economic indicators lagging by several months, so how do you establish a trend on that basis?


Our difference is clear, you think no trend can be established - I do. For example; Truman stopped the MacArthur's expansion of the war, with Republican support BTW; the effects of Eisenhower's GI Bill were instantaneous; Kennedy launched us to the moon in 9 years and NASA was born; LBJ implemented the 'War on Poverty'; Nixon opened China; Carter got Billy Beer to market; Reagan ended inflation; Bush I implemented the ADA, Clinton charted a course to boon times; Bush II initiated "no child left behind". All these administrations in place since my birth had some kind of positive trend established to their goal immediately. Whether you, or I support or agree with them is irrelevant there were immediate trends to the results generated. Why is this Administration given a pass for a relatively immediate positive trend?

I'll try to be as clear as possible. You did not represent anything positive occurring I agreed. You suggest all that is needed is time; even if the VP says they have to go back and read the material; I disagree, but we won't change each other's position. At least we are in agreement that currently nothing can be pointed to in the economy has been stimulated even though we've spend a few Billion of tax dollars trying to do so.




CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 4:14:02 PM)

quote:

Bush II initiated "no child left behind".


Sorry, Merc... He may have initiated a bunch of rhetoric, but I raised 3 offspring under "No Child Left Behind"... and the only trend I saw was to MORE useless tests measuring LESS education. More than half of my kids' classmates were 'left behind'. Here in Texas, there was over a 50% dropout rate under NCLB... and the standards of education were so low that my daughter didn't even learn how to do the math to balance a CHECKBOOK by the time she got out of high-school. It wasn't like she didn't take some classes. The transcript says she took them, and even -passed- them... but she didn't learn ANYTHING, and yet was an Honor Roll student. You figure it out. If we hadn't been home-schooling her on top of public school, she wouldn't have been fit to work at McDonalds.

(Putting her in public school was a prerequisite of her coming to live with us. I'd homeschooled my oldest, who is now running his own successful business. The youngest decided that he wanted to go military, so we discussed options with him, then arranged for a private education with increased fitness and strategy training for him.)

Dame Calla




Mercnbeth -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 4:33:40 PM)

Dame Calla,
I couldn't agree with you more regarding NCLB. It was, and is, one of the most ridiculous programs ever implemented. All of the 'accomplishments' were identified for the purpose of comparing prior administrations to the present in response to the 'time' factor. There are VERY few, in fact 1 or 2, I would represent as being positive. The NCLB would not be one of them.

NCLB generated a classroom of mediocrity at a time where we should be cultivating and nurturing those who have the ability for exceptional achievement. NCLB means that ALL children have been left behind, only required to keep up with the dumbest student in the class.

Sorry if I gave you any other representation - it was not intended.




CallaFirestormBW -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 7:00:57 PM)

I have to be honest. In Baby Bush's first few months of his first term, I didn't really see many "trends", although, to be honest again, living in Texas, I was sort of anticipating that the rest of the US would gravitate in the direction of Houston. The thing is, the Government are the wrong folks to be looked at to do anything about our economic woes. The things that will fix our economy have to come from the economy itself, in my mind. Sure, infusing money into the areas where one wants to see progress will move things along, but it works a LOT better if it is money from private investors with a VISION.

I think we've just gotten Giant Phallus Envy -- we want it all bigger and bigger and cheaper and cheaper, and SCREW quality, or innovation or effort. As long as we have that perspective, and as long as we continue to idolize companies who are so huge and disconnected and schizophrenic from diversification, we're going to continue to have an economy that is wasting away like a coked-out crack whore.

If we want something different, WE are going to have to get in there an nourish it. WE are going to have to decide that investing in the stocks of megacorporations with zero ethics and no commitment besides to their pockets isn't going to further our progress as people OR as an economy to be reckoned with. We need dreamers again. We need idea people, instead of Yes-men.

I'm not sure what my plans are in terms of everything that is going on. A big part of me says that things are so deep in the toilet that the only thing left to do is flush and hope it all goes down. The rest of me (and it's a steadily decreasing percentage these days, frankly) is saying that what we have here used to be worth fighting for, so I need to just hang in there and fight.

Demopublican... Republicrat... Independewelfarian... in the end, the titles don't mean doodle, because the PEOPLE haven't changed. We still want something for nothing, we still want to have what we can't pay for, and we still think people -OWE- us just because we got born and breathe the air. Until we change, our government, no matter -what- we call it, is still going to be royally screwed up.

DC




TreasureKY -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 8:51:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

So what do you think it will take to get our country to start living within ITs means?


First and foremost, get people into federal office who truly believe it needs to.  Until that happens... it ain't gonna happen. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

Do you think we're doing -anything- right?


Very little.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

Where would you trim and fiddle to get us squared away?


Well... I'm sorry, but it wouldn't be any one of the items you've listed.  Off the top of my head, the measures I would take would include (but not be limited to):
  • Eliminating 95% of all Federal departments, agencies, and bureaus.  Top on the list to eliminate would be the Department of Education, the Department of Energy, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and large portions of the Department of the Treasury (particularly the IRS and the ATF), the Department of Labor, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Homeland Security.  Any functions currently handled by these fund-guzzling, bureaucratic monstrosities would be handled at the State level should the overwhelming majority of the citizens of that State wish to continued with them.
  • Overhauling the current compensation programs for Legislative office holders so that pay and benefits are reasonable and in keeping with a conservative idea of public service.  Term limits would be imposed and "retirement" salaries eliminated.
  • Participation in and funding of "global efforts" would be closely examined for relevance to the welfare the United States.   Memberships and financing that did not support the preservation or moral standing of the United States, or prove to be of direct benefit to the majority of US citizens, would be eliminated.
There.  These steps alone should balance the budget and reduce taxes.   [:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

For me, the first things I would do would be:
  • Provide universal health insurance. A population with good medical care is healthier, more productive, and more creative. I would pay for it with a combination of increased individual taxes (probably by converting Medicare and its taxation system) and 'pleasure taxes' on cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana (yes, even medical marijuana), junk food, and prostitution, etc.
Aside from the fact that adding expenses (and additional bureaucracy) to the already overburdened Federal budget...

Who says that our population doesn't have access to good medical care?   Only 46 million out of 304 million people don't have health insurance in the US.... that's under 18 percent of the population.  How many of those 46 million need medical treatment and can't get it through other available means? 

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Eliminate the "War on Drugs" and the "War on Prostitution". Clear recreational drug users and prostitutes out of the prisons, and out of our court system. Decriminalize, regulate, and tax 'pleasure substances' including tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, sugar, white flour, sex workers, and junk food etc., to assist in funding universal health care.
While I don't buy into the "War on ...." propaganda campaigns, and I'm rather ambivalent on whether current illegal substances (or practices) should be legalized, I'd like to point out that every other legal substance is already taxed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Make college and trade-school FREE. Restore home economics, music, art, literature, and trades education to our schools. If we want innovation and creativity, we have to nurture it in our kids. Instead of parking them in front of the Nintendo, make them stretch their minds.
Since when did they eliminate home economics, music, art, literature and trades from colleges and trade schools?  If there's been a reduction in individuals studying those subjects, it's because they didn't want to or couldn't find a way to make a living doing those things.

Besides, I don't see how this would have any positive affect on our government living within its means.  Sounds like another additional expense to me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Fund the above through -charging- for education in the lower grades thru high-school. Give parents the option of using State-regulated schools, private schools, or homeschools, and have a set curriculum cost and resource sharing (like labs, pools, etc), regardless of which option or combination of options the parents pay for. Teach parents to value their child's education as something they are PAYING for, and expand the curriculum so that students who are academically oriented are thoroughly challenged, and children who are trades-oriented have the opportunity to learn a skill that will give them a good direction to start their lives. I'd lay wager that our 'dropout rate' would diminish, and more of our kids would actually start contributing to progress in our communities, instead of hanging out at the arcade or the convenience store making trouble. Ditch the expensive "teach to the test" system now in place. Reduce waste in the bureaucratic end of education.
While I agree whole-heartedly to the reduction of waste in the bureaucratic end of education (see my elimination of the Department of Education above), do you realize that parents already pay for primary education through taxes? 

And I'm sorry, but your obvious distress over the state of education for young people today, while admirable, again does nothing to further the cause of encouraging the country to live within its means.  I would point out that for years many legislators have tried in vain to put forth the option for parents to choose what schools their children attend with the use of vouchers.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Restructure our military. Pull our troops off foreign soil and take a good, hard look at who is profiting and who is benefiting for EACH and EVERY military campaign, tool, or process we have out there... Decide what the HECK our national security goals ARE... then decide how to use the tools we already -have- to meet those national security goals. Stop worrying about who a soldier loves, and make the most of the men and women who choose to lay their lives on the line to protect our country. Evaluate their LEADERS, and make sure that those leaders understand both what our goals are, and are equipped mentally, physically, and provisionally to MEET those goals.
The big question here would be just WHO would be the one deciding what our national security goals are?  And WHO would decide WHO that person will be?  Seems like we already have that covered.  Is it that you just don't agree with them?

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Ditch the Farm Bill. Start over, and screw paying people not to grow food or to grow food unsustainably. Encourage local markets, heirloom varietal food production, and food diversity. Eliminate the FDA -- they're too understaffed to do a good job anyway. Encourage local governments to develop food safety programs that are managed within the immediate economy and geared to the way local food is produced. Teach home economics in our schools again, so that these kids know what to DO with real food (I bet a bunch of our kids don't even know what food group 'corn on the cob' belongs in!!!). Encourage Farmer's Markets, local food production, small, local food production companies, and artisan eats.
I agree that the Department of Agriculture could use a thorough house cleaning, but I'm a little fuzzy on how kids knowing the food groups is going to balance the Federal budget... [&:]

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Restore our national rail service, and get the doggone thing back (if you'll pardon the pun) on track for both passenger and commercial use. Pay for it with a tax on multi-axle vehicles, based on the weight of goods being shipped on our national highway system. Our roads are too expensive to fix in many places anyway. More than half the bridges in the US need major repairs. We need to get commercial vehicles off the roads, and provide viable alternatives to driving and flying so that families can get out and travel again.
Perhaps you aren't aware of just how viable and active our railroads are these days.  Aside from that, I'm afraid your plans here would totally fuck up our supply and transportation systems.  Granted, I hate semi-tractor trailers hogging the roads as much as the next guy... but how the heck would you propose getting product from the rail stations to stores?  And don't think for one minute that the additional taxes for shipping wouldn't be passed off to the consumer.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Change to a 35 hour work-week, with guaranteed 6-week-minimum vacations, and unlimited sick days with doctor confirmation of illness. Yes, I know it sounds like a dichotomy, but American's work too much. They've lost their zest for life and their creativity, and depressed people don't support their economy. They buy themselves into the poorhouse with things they can't afford, but that does not generate the flow of MONEY... it generates the flow of strangling, life-sucking debt... and so we sink, ever deeper, into the mire with no hope to get out, no time for joy, too many hours spent in absolute drudgery, and a complete loss of creative, innovative, brilliant minds... and in the meantime, our best -leave-.
Okay... so it appears you've got this utopian idea in your head.  We should all live our lives as if we were in some Normal Rockwell painting.  But just how does all this address your original question of how to get the country to live within its means?  If you were referring to simply the citizens of the US learning to live within their individual means, I'd say most manage to well enough as it is.  However, with the items you've proposed, we'll all have a much higher tax burden.  No amount of canned goods and homespun clothing is going to be accepted as payment by the IRS.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

Yes, our current government reps may have misinterpreted what they were seeing, though how they could have is beyond me, when even an economic midget like myself could see this coming 15 years ago... but, giving the benefit of the doubt... I still think that our government, no matter how well intentioned, isn't going to be able to fix this on their own. They've had bad habits for FAR too long, and the leeches are too well entrenched over every inch of the corpus gubernationus. If we want this fixed, we're going to have to haul ourselves up by the bootstraps and tell them what the hell to do (and not do), and figure out what we need to do to spank them when they screw it up, instead of sitting in our living rooms and bitching. (and yes, I've already done my share of writing, calling, and writing, and calling, and parking on the steps of my supposed representatives' offices).


On this, we agree.  [;)]




slvemike4u -> RE: Biden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 9:48:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Hi Firm.

I didn't want to give in to the, uhm, poster who tries to hijack every thread he sees me posting and derail the thread by making it about me - but for the sake of clarity, I'm going to prove how wrong mike is with his erroneous assertions:

Sanity vs. Bush's Liberal spending habits

Further, I feel no need to defend myself for starting a thread about one of the most important issues of the day (the handling of the economy), while the majority of the Left apparently believes that keeping up with the day-to-day life of Sarah Palin is the most pressing concern before us as a nation.

I offer no apologies at all.  [:D]


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

No Sanity,first you prove your fair and balanced here....you point out how you have applied the same critical eye to the party on the right.....and than I will engage you in this discussion....Otherwise,this and all other threads started by you are nothing more than the ramblings and whining of one who's party has fell out of favor.
And before you try to turn this around...I have voted Republican and I have voted Democrat....I once even threw my vote away by Voting for a loon(Perot).

I think it would have been a waste of time to add to the plethora of anti-bush threads while he was in office.

Firm



Are you fucking kidding me ...a cursory look at your link shows no posting earlier than 2008 and most of them are your own typical hatchet job threads attacking Obama..... if I took the time to actually read this tripe(as if seeing them the first time around wasn't bad enough)I guess I would find some mention contained therein in which you decry Bush's spending in order to prove your objectivity as you attack then candidate Obama.
Try again Sanity...show us the honest broker you are show us all the threads you started....during Bush's PRESIDENCY complaining about his deficit spending,his budget shenanigans ...you know like not putting down the cost of the war...just sliding it forward.Given your  posting frequency and your loathing of such practices there should be plenty of such threads.


By the way....your post's become about you because it is about you....you and your obsession with this particular President.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 10:55:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Loki45




So....I'm not supposed to read stories about the housing market improving and take that as a sign of change?



If the housing market were actually improving why would you take it as a sign of change, and not just the normal housing price cycle? Unfortunately that is strictly a rhetorical question because it isnt improving. More sales, upwards of 30% of which are foreclosures and prices 20% below where they were a year ago which is 15% below the year before that is NOT "improvement", its deep pockets scooping up bargains as investments.




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Biden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 10:57:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Loki45

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth
Results are what they are


Just out of curiousity...do you leave a a football game or change the channel after the first quarter?



When the home team has been outscored 52-0? Yup




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 11:05:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Loki45

For one last 'college try' a simple google search can show you all you need to know.

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=recession+end+2009&aq=1&oq=recession+end&aqi=g10&fp=dMlfxuRvj0I

If the recession ends this year....that's a pretty big fucking trend toward the positive, isn't it?



Its called the business cycle. Funds from the so called "stimulus" package have barely even been rolled out. A handful of jobs have been created, and most of those are short term. So no, it isnt a "pretty big fucking trend toward the positive", its business as usual.




slvemike4u -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/6/2009 11:06:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

So what do you think it will take to get our country to start living within ITs means?


First and foremost, get people into federal office who truly believe it needs to.  Until that happens... it ain't gonna happen. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

Do you think we're doing -anything- right?


Very little.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

Where would you trim and fiddle to get us squared away?


Well... I'm sorry, but it wouldn't be any one of the items you've listed.  Off the top of my head, the measures I would take would include (but not be limited to):
  • Eliminating 95% of all Federal departments, agencies, and bureaus.  Top on the list to eliminate would be the Department of Education, the Department of Energy, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and large portions of the Department of the Treasury (particularly the IRS and the ATF), the Department of Labor, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Homeland Security.  Any functions currently handled by these fund-guzzling, bureaucratic monstrosities would be handled at the State level should the overwhelming majority of the citizens of that State wish to continued with them.

  • Overhauling the current compensation programs for Legislative office holders so that pay and benefits are reasonable and in keeping with a conservative idea of public service.  Term limits would be imposed and "retirement" salaries eliminated.

  • Participation in and funding of "global efforts" would be closely examined for relevance to the welfare the United States.   Memberships and financing that did not support the preservation or moral standing of the United States, or prove to be of direct benefit to the majority of US citizens, would be eliminated.
There.  These steps alone should balance the budget and reduce taxes.   [:D]

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

For me, the first things I would do would be:
  • Provide universal health insurance. A population with good medical care is healthier, more productive, and more creative. I would pay for it with a combination of increased individual taxes (probably by converting Medicare and its taxation system) and 'pleasure taxes' on cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana (yes, even medical marijuana), junk food, and prostitution, etc.
Aside from the fact that adding expenses (and additional bureaucracy) to the already overburdened Federal budget...

Who says that our population doesn't have access to good medical care?   Only 46 million out of 304 million people don't have health insurance in the US.... that's under 18 percent of the population.  How many of those 46 million need medical treatment and can't get it through other available means? 

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Eliminate the "War on Drugs" and the "War on Prostitution". Clear recreational drug users and prostitutes out of the prisons, and out of our court system. Decriminalize, regulate, and tax 'pleasure substances' including tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, sugar, white flour, sex workers, and junk food etc., to assist in funding universal health care.
While I don't buy into the "War on ...." propaganda campaigns, and I'm rather ambivalent on whether current illegal substances (or practices) should be legalized, I'd like to point out that every other legal substance is already taxed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Make college and trade-school FREE. Restore home economics, music, art, literature, and trades education to our schools. If we want innovation and creativity, we have to nurture it in our kids. Instead of parking them in front of the Nintendo, make them stretch their minds.
Since when did they eliminate home economics, music, art, literature and trades from colleges and trade schools?  If there's been a reduction in individuals studying those subjects, it's because they didn't want to or couldn't find a way to make a living doing those things.

Besides, I don't see how this would have any positive affect on our government living within its means.  Sounds like another additional expense to me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Fund the above through -charging- for education in the lower grades thru high-school. Give parents the option of using State-regulated schools, private schools, or homeschools, and have a set curriculum cost and resource sharing (like labs, pools, etc), regardless of which option or combination of options the parents pay for. Teach parents to value their child's education as something they are PAYING for, and expand the curriculum so that students who are academically oriented are thoroughly challenged, and children who are trades-oriented have the opportunity to learn a skill that will give them a good direction to start their lives. I'd lay wager that our 'dropout rate' would diminish, and more of our kids would actually start contributing to progress in our communities, instead of hanging out at the arcade or the convenience store making trouble. Ditch the expensive "teach to the test" system now in place. Reduce waste in the bureaucratic end of education.
While I agree whole-heartedly to the reduction of waste in the bureaucratic end of education (see my elimination of the Department of Education above), do you realize that parents already pay for primary education through taxes? 

And I'm sorry, but your obvious distress over the state of education for young people today, while admirable, again does nothing to further the cause of encouraging the country to live within its means.  I would point out that for years many legislators have tried in vain to put forth the option for parents to choose what schools their children attend with the use of vouchers.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Restructure our military. Pull our troops off foreign soil and take a good, hard look at who is profiting and who is benefiting for EACH and EVERY military campaign, tool, or process we have out there... Decide what the HECK our national security goals ARE... then decide how to use the tools we already -have- to meet those national security goals. Stop worrying about who a soldier loves, and make the most of the men and women who choose to lay their lives on the line to protect our country. Evaluate their LEADERS, and make sure that those leaders understand both what our goals are, and are equipped mentally, physically, and provisionally to MEET those goals.
The big question here would be just WHO would be the one deciding what our national security goals are?  And WHO would decide WHO that person will be?  Seems like we already have that covered.  Is it that you just don't agree with them?

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Ditch the Farm Bill. Start over, and screw paying people not to grow food or to grow food unsustainably. Encourage local markets, heirloom varietal food production, and food diversity. Eliminate the FDA -- they're too understaffed to do a good job anyway. Encourage local governments to develop food safety programs that are managed within the immediate economy and geared to the way local food is produced. Teach home economics in our schools again, so that these kids know what to DO with real food (I bet a bunch of our kids don't even know what food group 'corn on the cob' belongs in!!!). Encourage Farmer's Markets, local food production, small, local food production companies, and artisan eats.
I agree that the Department of Agriculture could use a thorough house cleaning, but I'm a little fuzzy on how kids knowing the food groups is going to balance the Federal budget... [&:]

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Restore our national rail service, and get the doggone thing back (if you'll pardon the pun) on track for both passenger and commercial use. Pay for it with a tax on multi-axle vehicles, based on the weight of goods being shipped on our national highway system. Our roads are too expensive to fix in many places anyway. More than half the bridges in the US need major repairs. We need to get commercial vehicles off the roads, and provide viable alternatives to driving and flying so that families can get out and travel again.
Perhaps you aren't aware of just how viable and active our railroads are these days.  Aside from that, I'm afraid your plans here would totally fuck up our supply and transportation systems.  Granted, I hate semi-tractor trailers hogging the roads as much as the next guy... but how the heck would you propose getting product from the rail stations to stores?  And don't think for one minute that the additional taxes for shipping wouldn't be passed off to the consumer.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW
  • Change to a 35 hour work-week, with guaranteed 6-week-minimum vacations, and unlimited sick days with doctor confirmation of illness. Yes, I know it sounds like a dichotomy, but American's work too much. They've lost their zest for life and their creativity, and depressed people don't support their economy. They buy themselves into the poorhouse with things they can't afford, but that does not generate the flow of MONEY... it generates the flow of strangling, life-sucking debt... and so we sink, ever deeper, into the mire with no hope to get out, no time for joy, too many hours spent in absolute drudgery, and a complete loss of creative, innovative, brilliant minds... and in the meantime, our best -leave-.
Okay... so it appears you've got this utopian idea in your head.  We should all live our lives as if we were in some Normal Rockwell painting.  But just how does all this address your original question of how to get the country to live within its means?  If you were referring to simply the citizens of the US learning to live within their individual means, I'd say most manage to well enough as it is.  However, with the items you've proposed, we'll all have a much higher tax burden.  No amount of canned goods and homespun clothing is going to be accepted as payment by the IRS.

quote:

ORIGINAL: CallaFirestormBW

Yes, our current government reps may have misinterpreted what they were seeing, though how they could have is beyond me, when even an economic midget like myself could see this coming 15 years ago... but, giving the benefit of the doubt... I still think that our government, no matter how well intentioned, isn't going to be able to fix this on their own. They've had bad habits for FAR too long, and the leeches are too well entrenched over every inch of the corpus gubernationus. If we want this fixed, we're going to have to haul ourselves up by the bootstraps and tell them what the hell to do (and not do), and figure out what we need to do to spank them when they screw it up, instead of sitting in our living rooms and bitching. (and yes, I've already done my share of writing, calling, and writing, and calling, and parking on the steps of my supposed representatives' offices).


On this, we agree.  [;)]
Well shit Treasure...why not just disolve the Union while your at it....ROFLMAO.




Loki45 -> RE: Biden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/7/2009 12:45:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
When the home team has been outscored 52-0? Yup


And that applies now because...?




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Biden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/7/2009 12:58:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Loki45

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
When the home team has been outscored 52-0? Yup


And that applies now because...?



Because his policies have done nothing to improve things but committed trillions to do it?




Loki45 -> RE: Biden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/7/2009 2:02:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy
Because his policies have done nothing to improve things but committed trillions to do it?


LoL

Good one. Thanks, I needed a good laugh before bed. [:D]

But seriously, if you've read the entire thread and seen the examples and still have that position....there's nothing anyone can do to help you.




CreativeDominant -> RE: Bidden: We 'Misread the Economy' (7/7/2009 7:07:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: Loki45

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Yes, it does...especially with those of you on the left any time someone from the right is in office.  About 2 days after Bush was in office, as I recall...




As I recall after Sept 11th 2001,Bush had all the support an American President could ask for both here and abroad.He and his puppet-master like V.P. than proceeded to squander all that support.
As usual your claims hold no water.
All the support?  That's not quite true, now is it?


The capitulation of the Democratic Party’s congressional leadership to the Bush administration’s request for nearly $100 billion of unconditional supplementary government spending, primarily to support the war in Iraq, has led to outrage throughout the country. In the Senate, 37 of 49 Democrats voted on May 24 to support the measure. In the House, while only 86 of the 231 Democratic House members voted for the supplemental funding, 216 of them voted in favor of an earlier procedural vote designed to move the funding bill forward even though it would make the funding bill’s passage inevitable (while giving most of them a chance to claim they voted against it).

The claim by Speaker Pelosi (D-CA) and other Democratic leaders unconditional funding was necessary to “support the troops” and to “not leave them in harm’s way” is a lie. If they really supported the troops and wanted them out of harm’s way, they would have passed legislation that would bring them home. The Democrats had other priorities, however...
The rest of the article can be found here:  http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4278

Following the events of September 11, Bush issued an executive order authorizing the NSA to monitor communications between suspected terrorists outside the U.S. and parties within the U.S. without obtaining a warrant pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,[219] maintaining that the warrant requirements of FISA were implicitly superseded by the subsequent passage of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists.[220] The program proved to be controversial, as critics of the administration, as well as organizations such as the American Bar Association, claimed it was illegal.[221] In August 2006, a U.S. district court judge ruled that the NSA electronic surveillance program was unconstitutional,[222] but on July 6, 2007 that ruling was vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on the grounds that the plaintiffs lacked standing.[223] On January 17, 2007, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales informed U.S. Senate leaders that the program would not be reauthorized by the President, but would be subjected to judicial oversight.[224] 

The rest of the article can be found here, with all sorts of citations documenting "support" for Bush's various policies, both here and abroad:   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush#cite_note-223
 
The point is that there were always those who did not support Bush's policies, from day one.  That was the point of my statement.  That's fine, you are never going to find 100% support for any president or his policies.  But the funny thing is, so many on the left forget that and prefer people to remember their latest switch...i.e., non-support of the war, etc....rather than their former stance UNTIL it works for them to bring up how they supported the opposition.  B ut even knowing that not all of them supported Bush (or any conservative's) policies from the start does not stop the defensive posture when someone attacks THEIR president's policies.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625