ThatDaveGuy69
Posts: 978
Joined: 6/22/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slavekal Really? I grabbed one at random...this one... [A lot of it is just laziness too. When I wanted to respond to the guy from Norway, I realized that I wasn't sure how to spell NORWEGIAN. So you know what I did? I looked it up. It's kind of easy to do when you are already on the friggin' internet. Good spelling does not make one effete or an elitist. It just means that they give half a crap.] What grammatical error did you find there? Or here...? I just HAD to jump on this one! The very 1st statement: "A lot of it is just laziness too.", should, in fact, have a comma (,) after laziness, ie: "A lot of it is just laziness, too.". Sorry, man - I just couldn't resist :D I can actually defend "could care less" but it requires a modifying statement afterward: Correct usage: I couldn't care less about his grammar. Incorrect usage: I could care less about his grammar. My defended version: I could care less about his grammar, if I tried. Emphasis needs to be placed on the word "could". But then again, this usage requires effort. I had a teacher in high school who was a bit anal-retentive about the word "thing". She would not allow the word in any papers we turned in. Being the natual-born smart-ass I am, I looked for ways to force the word into a sentence, making sure that no other word would do. It probably took more effort than simply finding a better word, but sometimes ya just gotta say WTF. Other usage annoyances: When a reporter uses "hurt" instead of "injured". All too often a story will read "... 5 people were hurt when the train..." I'll bet a lot more than 5 people were hurt. I'm sure everyone involved in the story was hurt in some way. But only 5 people were actually injuered, and that's the fact that is being reported. I know, I know: the news has been dumbed-down to a 1st-grade level. Been like that for years. Doesn't mean I have to like it. Thare are a couple of others, but my brain hurts and I can't think of them at the moment. On a bit of a tangent, I get irritated when a person pronounces the "t" in the word "often". The impression it leaves me with is that the speaker somehow thinks he is being more sophisticated when in fact he sounds a bit daft. The only time I ever heard the "t" when I was a young'en was in the rarely-used "oft-times", a cheesey contraction of "often times". Sadly, this pronounciation is becoming mainstream. Even those nice people at MW had to admit that the no-longer-silent "t" is gaining legitimacy simply through usage. Bummer. In the immortal words of both Dave Edmunds and Linda Ellerby: And so it goes... ~Dave
_____________________________
He said I'd blown a seal. I said fix the damn thing and leave my private life out of this! What happens in the event horizon STAYS in the Event Horizon! I have zero tolerance for Zero Tolerance
|