NihilusZero
Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008 From: Nashville, TN Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP No, because the two are intertwined. If she's a sexual assault survivor, then he may not be capable of taking care of her simply because what he thinks he should do may not at all be the appropriate thing to do. You're missing the point. Even if he's incapable of dealing with her psychological issue (which should raise flags about being in the situation to begin with), then I would hope (or maybe I'm just projecting here) that there is an understood degree of trust, in choosing to surrender/submit to someone, that they can make those types of decisions. He's not even being given the chance to make the statement that seeking out a therapist is likely what's best. Granted, this isn't necessarily about him...but this is the dynamic that has been chosen by both parties. Ironically, there is apparently only one lucid, objective party as it relates to her situation...and she's keeping that very party in the dark and then lashing out due to the emotional seclusion. The party that, presumably, has been chosen for his role because of his capacity to care and make prudent decisions. (Note: Kallista, while I'm discussing an angle of the topic that I think is pertinent and forceful in order to induce some focus in a positive direction, I'd like you to at least know that my motivations aren't to be personally abrasive. Despite the fact that you asked the the original questions in a sense of acquiring responses from the general public, it's obvious that the intent is personal. Hence, this disclaimer.)
< Message edited by NihilusZero -- 7/19/2009 10:19:47 PM >
_____________________________
"I know it's all a game I know they're all insane I know it's all in vain I know that I'm to blame." ~Siouxsie & the Banshees NihilusZero.com CM Sex God du Jour CM Hall Monitor
|