CreativeDominant -> RE: sexual deprivation (7/27/2009 8:14:20 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rednicky Well I won't say I wasn't expecting this. I knew I was wrong. I was just hoping I wasn't really alone and that this was a common fantasy for at least quite a few women. But I guess I'm alone in this. I've never brought such a thing to fruition because I wanted to talk about it first with people who know more about D/s than I probably ever will. Though I'm surprised that so many would discover my motives so soon, were I to end up in such a relationship. I dunno why but taking away some power from a man who feels he has all the power really interests me. Of course this wouldn't last forever and, in the end, I would genuinely want him to be my dominant that I serve. But not before watching all of what I described take place. I chose to answer here rather than your first post as those who've answered that one have pegged it correctly---manipulation, deceit, brattiness, cock-teasing, bitterness. Now, as to what you've said above. Why would you want him to be your dominant only after all that you described had taken place? Because he would NOT be the brightest crayon in the bunch and by then, you would have definitely set his insecurities into full swing. Plus, after the "rape", you'd also have his guilt working in your favor. So now, I believe the answer to your unstated inquiry...why would you want him to be your dominant...is clear. Because he is now the dominant that you dominate. You can bet his domination of you would be in any manner you chose, simply to keep the "gift" of your sexuality and your "submission". quote:
I hadn't pegged that sex would be just that to so many people: sex. I understand those who say they'd say "fuck it" and find someone else. I don't understand those who'd keep me but have someone around specifically designed for sexual pleasure. Amongst many conversations I've had with my father, he's said that eventually men lose interest in just having sex and want someone special and close to their heart to have sex with. Especially when they get older. Empty sex that is only built for pleasure gets stale after a while. At least that's what he said. Perhaps there was some mistake. But what he said is partly why I expect the guy in my hypothetical example to, sort of, stick it out. Imagine a girl who is the greatest thing to be around but simply said she wants to hold off on the intimacy and sex talk until she's more comfortable. Sure, it may take a while but I hadn't expected so many of you to take that as a warning and get out of the relationship. I mean, what if I was serious in wanting to take things slow? How could you tell the difference between someone who seriously wants to take things slow and someone who is manipulating? There is a difference between slow that is a comfortable level for both partners and slow in the way that one partner only...and especially the submissive partner...dictates. There is also a difference in the intent behind the slowness...if you want to make sure that you really mean something to him before you give it up, I hate to disillusion you but there are those guys out there who will play your "game"...and believe me, they will spot it as a game...and then, once they've convinced you they care and they've gotten the "goodie", they'll be gone...laughing over another pathetic manipulative bitch who could not be honest about all of her intentions because you see, for you...it is not just about caring. That has been said to possibly alleviate some of the knocks you've taken. For you, it is indeed about power and where it lies.
|
|
|
|