CaringandReal
Posts: 1397
Joined: 2/15/2008 Status: offline
|
Here's a quick answer. I may want to say more later but I must get to bed soon. I don't think slaves or submissives are very different in terms of personalities, needs, expectations, all that inner stuff that makes you who you are. The difference to me seems to be one of a role, or what your master imposes on you or expects from you. A submissive in a slave role has fewer choices than one who is not. She or he retains less control over their own actions, makes fewer decisions usually, defers more to the dominant's decisions. A submissive is free to have her own life, to impose limits, to say no. A slave can ask or beg that something not be done to her (or, if it's good, that it be done to her) but she has no right to expect it will--that's up to her master. The differences I'm describing are in the style of relationship you have, not in anything you are personally. I think the confusion with the personal comes up because some people prefer one role, slave or submissive, over the other, and seek that role out, so they start identifying with the role. Think of it as a job: some people like to be mathemeticians, some construction workers, some small business owners. Different roles, different jobs, but they do not define the person. It's late, so I hope this makes sense! ;)
|