Zevar
Posts: 801
Status: offline
|
FR~
As in every criminal offense there is always more than one perspective. There is most often opinion without fact. Then there is fact that cannot be changed or altered by opinion. None the less as humans opinion is something we all express. Then there is the judicial system and those who enforce law and those who look for every loophole to allow offenders a way out of their crimes with minimal punishment and some cases no punishment at all. Namely plea bargaining.
In regarding to opinion in and of itself opinion never convicts anyone nor does it sentence anyone. Prosecution and defense wars to prove their perspective as factually true beyond a reasonable doubt or beyond a shadow of doubt. In the case of Polanski he incriminated himself. Upon realizing his lot in life he fled upon learning that his fame in Hollywood would NOT give him above the law status. Being a French citizen he was given asylum by his country of origin and where he has legal citizenship.
The long term protection he has had the luxury of which included protection from facing extradition was granted by the French government to Polanski and this is what is in question currently. He fled prosecution from the United States of American which surely is constituted as another country. His government has every legal right to extend whatever their law allows to this wanted felon.
Accordingly Polanski is also in question. Rightly so. Interestingly enough this appears to be a text book classic case as now Polanski is advocating to be the victim of this 30 years old crime. Combined with the support of the now adult victim who at the time of the Criminal Offence occurring was a legitimate 13 year old minor. More than likely it looks like a day in the candy store for Polanski. Call on your countrymen Polanski. Loudly and plaster all of your lies with the media. There is a time for everything, even after running and hiding. This could fairly well be said toward Polanski. Indeed many would willingly stone the man. His actions, choices and abominable acts is what stirs this in the hearts of those who agree that NEVER does anyone harm a minor, regardless.
Polanski admittedly concurred that he did indeed intoxicate and drug a minor that he did sexually assault which was the same 13 year old minor intoxicated and drugged by himself. There is nothing that can disprove his admission now. The statues of limitation in accordance with the said Federal or State Sentencing Guidelines will be rather difficult to amend at this point.
There will continue to be a legal debate as there is now a bitter battle to prosecute or not. Has Polanski served his time or not? In more than not most sexual offenders do not psychologically define their criminal acts as criminal. The definitions of appropriate socially acceptable sexual behavior is usually a distorted version by sexual offenders to fit there perverted definition of their unhealthy sexual desires which are fueled by preying on innocent children.
Professionally speaking there is a Psychological Evaluation Process for all sexual offenders. The battery of testing is usually viewed and experienced by most sexual offenders as grueling in many ways. There are common complaints to change the testing process of evaluation which is reported by sexual offenders to alleviate their distress in addressing their unspeakable crimes committed to minors. The process none the less is not amendable regardless how much a sexual offender complains. Further more than not offenders have their own agenda which is usually covert. Some might be overt yet most are covert. A common denominator in any sexual assault. No sexual assault is disclosed prior to the attack. To disclose prior would inflate the crime for the sexual offender. Thus their motives are not disclosed prior to crimes and usually not ever. It is a process of study and extract to become versed in how a sexual offender thinks and behave.
This mind set is more than likely what Polanski is relying on to redeem him from his much needed sentencing. In the evaluation process a sexual offender must provide a sexual history. This is where a trained professional can determine the likelihood of an offenders ability to demonstrate a balanced sense of disclosure among others variables.
It is reported by reliable sources that thereafter the Psychological Evaluation Process is when Polanski began to retreat thus was not present for his Arraignment Hearing. It is reported that Legal representation appeared on his behalf and as a result of Polanski not appearing the case remains set aside. Therefore Polanski can be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law which is why this case has hit the media frenzy as it has. The cowardly sexual offender is trembling in the Light of Justice.
Polanski is also undoubtedly doing his shuffling victim act and redirecting the issue so he can continue to feel a pseudo sense of power as he cons people to believe his lies, upon lies, upon lies, upon lies. The foundation of all sexual offenses tend to be built upon coercion, deceit and secretiveness. His inaccessible world of sexual pervasion has turned on him as it eventually does in the case with every sexually offender. They might fool some of the people some of the time. Maybe some, yet not all.
What Polanski admittedly committed is unconscionable. There is NO time when a grown adult is justified in taking advantage of a minor. 0 X 100 = ZERO The answer every time. Never harm a minor. Never! Polanski is held to the same law as others as in....If he thinks the rules do NOT apply as they do to others, be careful. Think again. Hollywood idol or not. Flee, run, hide or retreat. We reap what we sow OR What we sow we reap. Either way inverted or not it is the same outcome. Plant it and you will harvest it in time. Now or hereafter. Justice does reign. Believe it or not.
Wrong is wrong. Right is Right. Never harm a little one. Never. There are those among who stand on the watchmen wall and are trained and work in unity for the protection of the innocent ones, the children and all young people who are not of a consenting legal age in accordance with law. If wondering, could the innocent ever be the admitted sexual offender? Think again. Not actor, Hollywood idol or thief of innocence who lies while looking into the eyes of minor with no feeling for what they say or do nor is it country or countryman.
Conclusion: Harm a minor and you pay. Now or hereafter. Justice does win after all, regardless.
We reap what we sow OR What we sow we reap.
I wish you well,
~Zevar~
< Message edited by Zevar -- 9/28/2009 9:19:32 PM >
|
RE: Polanski Arrested. - 
Profile
. 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread