kyraofMists
Posts: 3292
Joined: 7/29/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ExistentialSteel Ownedgirlie presented poignant posts that cut to the heart of our relationships as surely as that knife her Dom held against her could have. However, I don’t waste time on the question if it is the M/s relationship that makes it stronger or the personalities. My thoughts turn to why does it have to be one or the other? The two are intertwined as much as the original posts are on CM. It does happen as Ownedgirlie described so well. It goes to a depth where fact and fiction combine creating a nebulous picture like looking at something deep under water. What primarily captivates someone so deeply is a mix of so many things that I won’t even start. I just know it happens. ES, Who is the “our” that you are referring to? I don’t see how our = lifestyle because her explanation does not come anywhere close to my own experience or the experience of many people/couples I know. For one, authority structure in intimate relationships is not unique to the lifestyle. Within my own family there are many couples that have an authority structure and some where one person has complete authority over the other and they consider themselves conventional relationships or vanilla. So I do not see how the authority structure in lifestyle relationships translates into more trust than conventional ones. As for the knife to the throat, it is an activity with a degree of risk to it that requires trust in a very specific context. I would trust several people to hold a knife to my throat and 99% of them are not in the lifestyle. For me it is a question of three things: morality (will this person harm me), skill (can this person handle a knife) and recklessness (does this person seek to minimize risks). Now, when you start talking about sexual desire for this activity, I think that is more specific to the lifestyle but not the trust aspect of the activity. Vulnerability is also not unique to the lifestyle. I have not found couples in the lifestyle to be any more vulnerable to their partners than couples I know who have conventional relationships. Ownedgirlie’s posts indicate that she is more vulnerable and gives more of herself because of the structure of the relationship. In her explanation, the cause is the relationship structure and the outcome is increased vulnerability. For me, it is just the opposite. The cause is the desire to give everything and be as vulnerable as possible and the effect is choosing a partner who cherishes that. The formal M/s structure of my relationship is just a reflection of who my Lord and I are and what we want in life. Even if he and I had not discussed the desire for an M/s relationship, the same authority structure would still exist because it is a natural expression of who we are. Take away the M/s “trappings” (for lack of a better word) in my relationship with my Lord and I would still love him as much, trust him as much, be as vulnerable, give as much and still be as obedient. Neither approach is right or wrong; it is just our own personal perspective in our relationships. You say: quote:
What primarily captivates someone so deeply is a mix of so many things that I won’t even start. I just know it happens. I don’t disagree with this statement, I just have yet to hear a convincing argument at to why it is more, better, deeper for lifestyle relationships than conventional ones. Ownedgirlie spoke only of her own personal experience between conventional and lifestyle relationships and why in her individual case she trusts more in this lifestyle relationship. However her experience does not speak for lifestyle relationships as a whole and neither do mine, so I am not understanding why there is this opinion that lifestyle relationships as a whole require more trust than conventional relationships. Knight's kyra
_____________________________
"Passion... it lies in all of us. Sleeping, waiting, and though unbidden, it will stir, open its jaws, and howl. It speaks to us, guides us... passion rules us all. And we obey..." ~Angelus
|