MrDiscipline44
Posts: 1776
Joined: 1/5/2005 Status: offline
|
I could've sworn this thread got pulled? Oh, well. quote:
ORIGINAL: caitlyn It's par for the course angelic. About half of these posts that contain the word "abuse" turn into various sorts of quazi-flames, aimed at anyone voicing an opinion that is outside the lifestyle norm. Funny, I haven't seen anybody flame anyone. Flaming is posting derrogator remarks directly at someone. I just haven't seen it. quote:
I'm going to agree with you in part, in that while I don't think persay that the very words spoken are abusive, I do think this is an abusive relationship waiting to happen. As stated before by others, if it's consentual, how is it abusive? Abuse is non-consentual. quote:
I completely differ with the notion expressed by some, that someone responding to this ad, and entering into this sort of relationship, knows exactly what they are getting into. To me (and this is only my opinion) that is good old SSC speak. People might want to remember that just because you are sane (generic "you" not representing anyone in particular), that doesn't mean others are ... and if you are a sane consentual person, you just can't see the point of view of those with a little more clouded thought process. In effect, you (again, a generic you) are judging from a point of view that probably doesn't exist in some minds. Simply put ... it may seem SSC to them, but really isn't, because the voice of reason, for them, really doesn't exist. Rational people can't see this for what it is, which is why we have the really off-point attempt to relate/rationalize this to spanking, and healthy name calling, and what the vanilla world thinks. These examples are not applicable, and the very fact that only non-applicable examples are used, shows the lack of understanding for the whole issue. In order to say that the person responding to this ad does not know what they are getting themselves into, you must first know the person that is responding to the ad. In order to say they don't know what they are getting into, you must show that they are not of a sound mind. Then, to say they are not of sound mind to want this relationship, you must have a masters in psych, your own practice and run them through a list of test to detimine this. Do you have a Masters in psych? Do you have the battery of test to prove someone is of a sound mind? Since you most likely do not (and yes, I maybe wrong) then you must remember that we can not go around holding peoples hands telling them what best for them and whats not. We also can only say whats sane to us personally, as an individual. quote:
Since angelic has probably been flamed enough in this post, maybe some can be drawn away. Any hint of abuse, of any kind, needs to be exposed and that person ostracised. To say that "the person knows what they are getting into" is just a morally bankrupt position. "Let the who has no sin, cast the first stone" Let's take this out of the Biblical context that it was first said in and apply it to the situation we have here. What this statement means is that you have no right to judge another because you, yourself, are not perfect. To the vanillia world, we are all veiwed as being insane or abusive for what we like to do, reguardless of how small. Shall you be the first one ostracised, caitlyn? You have no right to call any relationship abusive unless your apart of it. quote:
This moves error on the side of caution, nothing more, and nothing less. I know that isn't a popular position, but sometimes doing what is right, is just not popular. There needs to be a clear understanding that the satanically evil fucks that do the most dreadful of things, are usually the same evil fucks that are best at playing it off as discipline, training and a lifestyle. And you must also understand, caitlyn, that humans are adaptive. If they find that one source is shut off, they find another. If they can't get what they want overtly, they'll find it covertly. "Evil fucks" (as you say) have been part of our societies since the dawn of man and will most likely be apart of mankind til it's extinction. Unfortunately, there will never be a utopia because of them. There will never be a perfect world. They are apart of human nature. An undeniable part, because if we don't have one(the evil fucks) we won't have the other (the opposite of the evil fucks). Hell, we even look for the evil fucks in places they're not in.
_____________________________
If you love somebody, you have to be willing to break them. Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Have you slapped your slave today?
|