lovingpet
Posts: 4270
Joined: 6/19/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leadership527 quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP But if she makes it clear that having sex with someone else will not maximize your happiness, but lessen it, then isn't she still knowing in her head that you won't make her do this? Carol: In a way, "yes". I certainly know that he will take my thoughts into strong consideration. Thus far, he has certainly been better than I am at making a very happy relationship between us. In the end, I could speculate a million horror scenarios. But I could also speculate situations in which he chose to do this for MY benefit and at cost to him. Why would I go down all the evil paths when he's never demonstrated such behavior in the past? In the end, you have to remember that this is all about building trust between us. And to do that, the situations have to be spooky somehow or no growth can happen. That's what it's all about (despite baseless claims of hokey-pokey advocates everywhere ). The bottom line is that I trust him to turn me into a poly-friendly, kinky, whatever. Hell, I turned him into a democrat. Really, in all seriousness, the bottom line is that I trust him to meddle with my internal values and worldview. As long as that trust is there, then what's the concern? Jeff: I think the part you're missing here Des is that Carol and I are not in some sort of competition and there's no zero-sum game in play. She isn't giving things to me and I'm not taking them. I have said, "Here is a way that we could be even tighter as a couple." Predictably, she's accepted that vision and is now working with me to make it happen -- INSIDE HER OWN HEAD.. not simply with outward obedience. So she's reworking her value system and worldview to match the challenge I've laid before her. It is certainly possible that, in the end, she won't be able to do so (although at this point, I'm about 95% sure she will... in fact she's virtually there). If it turned out to be not possible, then it is "not possible". And unlike that ridiculous can't vs. won't thread, I have a very clear grip on reality. If I commanded Carol to go stand on the front porch and flap her arms till she took flight, she'd go flap her arms, but if she failed to take flight, I wouldn't exactly see that as disobedience. So in the end, there is the statement of my trust in her. Trust goes both ways in a M/s dynamic. I very strongly identify with what the two of you are doing. I would feel quite angry if I were punished when I was doing the internal work to be able to move in the direction my partner is leading. It isn't a lack of obedience or trust. There's groundwork to be laid when there are certain matters on the table. My partner is not one to want to reap the benefits without putting in the work. There are things I have come to accept and part of his vision that have requried him to teach me about a whole other conception of things. He has had to demonstrate an alignment with my own morality, ethics, and worldview and in some cases close the gaps between them. He has had to support me when it came time to let go and accept something and all the ramifications involved in doing so. I don't understand why working toward acceptance and/or obedience is seen as a bad thing. Even a computer may need a few moments to process a command from the user. A human can't have the same relative luxury? Most of my obedience and following is automatic. Some is a little reluctant and slow, but gaining speed and sureness. Other times, though it is more like planning a 2 month voyage around the world. There's a lot to consider and lots of provisions, back up plans, and oddities to be incorporated in the final plan. The plan is his and I will follow him on the trek and I know it will be an incredible adventure. My part is to understand, have a readiness for what is to come, and know my own role in it all. Maybe I should beat my travel agent in March when I haven't gotten to execute my summer vacation yet! LOL I will admit to just jumping into this thread more or less feet first, but I know what so many of the old contentions are. Automatic, brainless submission, though it has a nice ring in fantasyland, isn't all that practical. I am still human. I trust my partner. I want to follow wherever he leads. I want to obey and please him in all things. I believe all of these things can coexist. I am probably not on point with where the discussion is, but it seems to be accurate for this particular excerpt. I like a real life, flesh and blood relationship in which I can be two real people living out some of our wildest dreams. lovingpet
_____________________________
If you put your head into more, you'd have to put your back into less. ~Me 10 Fluffy pts.
|