ESVA24SubF
Posts: 2
Joined: 10/14/2009 Status: offline
|
Troi make a very valid point. I have had potential slaves/submissives turn me down flat upon hearing we have a small son. Our intention is to keep all appearances of 'roommates' or friends and what goes on after he goes to bed is not anything he needs to have anything to do with. This WOULD preclude bothering with any slaves who expect to be kept naked/chained/caged at all times. I also agree with some of the posters that you can DESIRE that a slave submit to the Dominants whole family, but do you really want your kids raised that way? I was raised to have respect for my elders and to consider others feelings, and I want my children to be the same way. It doesn't make you any less Dominant to understand how others feel, rather, I think it gives you a depth of appreciation for the dynamics of a BDSM relationship. I think there may well be some on here who are Dominant because they just never had to sacrifice having their own way. If you bring children into this world you OWE it to THEM to bring them up as well rounded individuals, then they can grow into their own sensuality as the mature through adolescence. You also owe it to society not to turn out teenaged psychopaths that think that the entire world exists for their convenience. This is just my opinion, and I have a feeling that those who think their slaves should dote on their childs every wish will lambaste me, but I don't care. Rather I have to say that requiring your sub/slave to humor your children is bordering on including them in the kink, and that is just wrong. Aside from all the above, I applaud the original poster for bringing up a good and valid topic. I understand the need to limit any discussions of illegal activities, but an open and frank discussion of how to blend lifestyle activities and family life is something that I think some of us could benefit from others thoughts and ideas to maximize our opportunities for 'playtime' while protecting our next generation. quote:
ORIGINAL: Troi Normally when I see threads like this I sit back and just smile. REASON: when someone decides to take a position, they are likely to get hammered by another, who 1. is so mindlocked they are unable to even consider other opinions 2. will go off on a buzzword or keyword as a means to chastise or silence another. That's precisely what I saw here. KNOCK IT OFF. I've read the kneejerk reaction to Bondsmaid's post. Guess what? RE READ what she said. No where in her post do I see ANYTHING inappropriate. What I did see was someone who lives in the REAL world, yanno other than in cybertext or forums... simply saying that we do not exist in a closed society, where we can PRETEND that only adults are affected by lifestyle choices. Are you really going to even THINK about slamming someone for acknowledging REALITY? I understand why safeguards are in place in this forum and I agree with them. What I don't agree with is this tendency for reactionary posting because you may not agree with the poster...citing rules. Does this cyber lawyering change the reality of the concept? I think not. So let's step back. Take a pause. Do whatever we need to do to insure that we're not taking out our own personal needs or insecurities upon another and above all else... address the post... NOT the poster. *Sets out a cigar box of BIG BLUE CRAYONS for those who may need them. I wish you most well, Troi
|