DemonKia
Posts: 5521
Joined: 10/13/2007 From: Chico, Nor-Cali Status: offline
|
FR, after skim thru The paradigms I've found most resonant are as follows: Data comes in thru the 6 senses -- sight, sound, taste, tactility, scent, & cognition / consciousness. The mind reacts to this data, & emotions are part of the tool-kit of reaction to the data. Note that cognition itself generates both data (thoughts, memories, etc) & feelings. & that 'feelings' & 'emotions' are bio-electro-chemical events happening in the brain. So, 'valid' in the sense of 'are there concrete physical events connected to emotions?', yes, they are physical events occurring in the brain of the feeler. Cascades of neuro-chemicals bathing different modules of the brain & neurons firing across synapses & etc . . . . & thus they are 'real' in the sense that they are not optional in the moment, nor are they particularly consensual. Typically, they just happen & they just are . . .. . . Also, it is my belief from observation that humans probably should / do feel the full range of potential basic emotions within any given time period. (The time period probably has lots of variability from person to person & even over one's lifetime. The basic set of emotions has some research as to universality, which ones, & etc, but that is the subject of another thread, I'd think . . . ) As to the 'you make me' thing, that's a bit of a pet peeve of mine. I'm pretty relentless with myself & the offspring & other intimates about using the construct of 'I feel thus & such when you do blah blah blah' & variants . . . . . I have this bit I tell people sometimes when I bring the topic up: I say, if I could 'make' you be one way or another, if you had some 'dial' on your back that I could set to, say, 'happy', then I would. I'd make it my life's mission to go about setting everyone's dials to happy, & then breaking them so they can never be anything but happy. For purely selfish reasons, too -- it would be the end of whining (in theory, I know so many get such joy from it) . . . . . (&, yep, I don't like the 'you make me' construct when it's applied to 'positive' emotions, either . . . . I tend to say things like 'being around you is a joyous thing for me' or simply 'I'm happy / pleased / whatever' or 'I love you' or 'you're so ______' . . . . . I don't like giving them the burden of being responsible for my happiness when it can be such a transitory feeling, thus leading them to feel participants when the happiness fades & some other emotion, less pleasant, comes onto the table, even tho' they may have had nothing to do with my plunge in mood . .. . . & that has happened all too often, & deliberately staying out of the 'you make me' place has been a part in reducing those kinds of misunderstandings . .... . ) Frankly, part of the reason I am such a hard-ass about this communicational stratagem is that I find it easier to hold others accountable for their behavior by using it than I do when I use the 'you make me' approach . . . . . . In my experience, 'you make me' is perceived as more accusatory than the other way, despite how subtle the differences seem. The 'I feel thusly when I have this kind of experience' tactic carries lots of potential to detach the issue away from people's value judgments about being 'good' people or 'bad', which, to me, is the source of so much defensiveness & attack-defend communicational interference . . . . . . . & usually this is all contextualized, for me, in discussions about taking power over one's life. I particularly dislike the 'you make me' construct because I have significant power & control issues, & once I learned to 'take control' in this manner I dislike ceding that particular power to others . . . . . . If I cognitively allow the possibility that other people can 'make me feel' this or that, it has no end. There's so much crap in the universe I'd end up maddened. Peace accompanied my increasing ability to control when & where I'd be willing to expose my feeling self. & note that I think I'm way too thin skinned, sensitive to the point of excessiveness & annoying myself. I used to have quite a temper, & many still perceive me as being, um, passionate . . .. Yeah, there are people & situations & etc that are guaranteed I'll have 'negative' emotional reactions to, but I also have a lot of control over both initially & continuing to expose myself. I have walked away from social interactions, jobs, friendships, family members, & etc, because I was unwilling to give them the power to 'make me feel' whatever crap they were trying to elicit. & yeah, absolutely recognizing explicitly that there are plenty who will deliberately try to evoke awful feelings in other people -- as manipulation; as covert or overt sadism, ethical or not; irrationally; & etc .. . . . But. Again. I've found that reworking my thoughts that still all too often initiate as 'you made me' into 'I'm having this emotional reaction to this stuff that I'm perceiving' gives me power to deal with those behaviors, when I spot them & when I don't (helps me spot them, in fact -- I've found that the dysfunctionally / predatory / problematic / what-have-you people I've encountered overwhelmingly use the 'you make me' constructs rather than the 'I feel this way in thus & such situations' kinda thing, & that for the dysfunctional, et al, it's part & parcel of their problematic stuff) . .. . Protects me & helps me feel strong & as if I really do have some hold onto the tenuous wisps of illusory control that the universe allows . .. . Is it okay if I leave it at just answering the OP in this post? Cuz it would take me more paragraphs to get to some of the other questions that popped up in the course of the thread & this damn post has grown gigantonormous as it is . . . . Lushy, for instance, asked an interesting, tho' somewhat tangential question that I could take a swing at, so, let me know, any of you, if you want me to address your specific side questions . . . . If any of you are still awake out there . . .
_____________________________
Snarko ergo sum. The Verbossinator
|