cpK69
Posts: 1593
Joined: 5/9/2008 Status: offline
|
After the last few days of thinking on the topic, I am now certain that my emotions cannot tell me a single thing about another person; only me. Also, that thing they indicate, which I was unable to put a term to, before, is vulnerabilities. I'm not sure what to call it, though, perhaps 'vulnerabilities of ego'? If my thoughts are accurate, to say “you make me feel”, is to blame someone else for my ego? I still think emotions are valid, but only in being used to assess these vulnerabilities; never to judge, nor in deciding a course of action, especially since they tend to cloud perception. (maybe logic is a better word) If I am having an emotional reaction due to perceiving my beliefs are being slighted, then it is my inability (or perceived inability) to defend my beliefs that I am reacting to. Perception is not the same thing as emotions; it is possible to be aware of something, without being vulnerable to it; even if that something acts in a manner requiring me to counter act. Intuitiveness is something slightly different then perception; I think, because it’s not only about observing what is, but also, detecting what isn’t. (It’s a new thought though, so I’m not sure how accurate it is.) As for “interest” being an emotion; I would think a sincere inquirer would be objective in their acquisition of information/experience; emotions do not fit in that category. ... and food; it’s just not one of those things I give a lot of thought toward; if it weren’t a necessity, I might never think of it. quote:
ps...you are one of the most human people I know on this site...just the fact you worry about it makes you special. I'm still pondering this statement.... Kim
< Message edited by cpK69 -- 12/20/2009 10:11:38 AM >
_____________________________
Humility is where weakness and strength meet and humanity begins. one voice
|