Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Misogyny and BDSM


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Misogyny and BDSM Page: <<   < prev  47 48 [49] 50 51   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 7:55:02 PM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23
You use ridiculously obtuse language that honestly makes my eyes glaze over.  You use twenty words when four would do.  You are embodying the worst habits of philosophers ...I would request that you actually focus on brevity and clarity rather than trying to impress me with your ability to torture a sentence beyond all human decency.


Lotta that goin' around.

< Message edited by AnimusRex -- 1/5/2010 8:25:53 PM >

(in reply to Psychonaut23)
Profile   Post #: 961
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 7:57:56 PM   
AnimusRex


Posts: 2165
Joined: 5/13/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri
My "IQ scores" have varied so far as 62 points & I've been accused of "cheating". *rolls eyes*



Funny thing- mine was estimated as being as high as 62 also, and I really was cheating.

(in reply to Kimveri)
Profile   Post #: 962
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 8:13:58 PM   
Lucienne


Posts: 1175
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline
I was so relieved that at least no one had brought up Mensa. Alas, my relief was premature.

quote:

ORIGINAL: frazzle

Not a clue how the quotes feature works,

...

Mensa is over 143, or was when i took up membership.


For fuck's sake people. Can we pump some self-awareness in here?

quote:

I would also agree that common sense and communication have nothing to do with intelligence.


Another relief.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri


Bottom line? It doesn't matter what your intelligence tests at, at whatever age. It doesn't matter what that piece of paper hanging on your wall says about how educated you are. What does matter is what you DO with what you have.


Agreed 100%. I learned a lot through my formal education. And I've learned a lot outside of it. I'd rather spend my time with a person of average "raw" intelligence and above-average curiosity than with a person of above-average intelligence who's only interested in jumping through credential hoops. I've known a lot of "smart" people who are pretty tedious when it comes right down to it precisely because they don't do a damn thing with those smarts other than apply them to some obvious way to make money. Yawn.

(in reply to frazzle)
Profile   Post #: 963
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 8:16:26 PM   
frazzle


Posts: 1212
Joined: 6/20/2009
Status: offline
does that mean i earnt a brownie point, much more useful.

(in reply to Lucienne)
Profile   Post #: 964
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 8:19:29 PM   
Lucienne


Posts: 1175
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: frazzle

does that mean i earnt a brownie point, much more useful.


The Keebler elves don't make enough brownies in a year to have sufficient points to award to self-proclaimed Mensa members saying stupid shit on the internet.

(in reply to frazzle)
Profile   Post #: 965
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 8:33:17 PM   
BitaTruble


Posts: 9779
Joined: 1/12/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
quote:

As a moral relativist, I accept all moralities as equally valid to my own. That does not mean that I will sit idly by when someone acts in a way I will not put up with.


This is a contradiction. A moral relativist who accepts all moralities as equally valid *would* sit idly by because any action taken would invalidate the ideal of moral relativism at the moment any action is taken. Maybe I'm too much of a Vulcan for my own good.. but that does not compute.

As an example, I'll use the thread which you started on the Gorean forum - the cartoonist who allegedly fled the room leaving his granddaughter behind. A moral relativist would not take issue with that action because they would view it as a valid action to take based on the morals of the cartoonist. That is not to say that the moral relativist would take that same action at all but it would be the person who embraced a universal morality who would be the one to take umbrage at that particular action and you certainly appeared to be quite displeased with the cartoonists action in that circumstance.

How do you align a claim of moral relativism with an 'action' you would take (you would not sit idly by when someone acts in a way contrary to your own morals)? How is it that the cartoonist is less than manly (paraphrasing here) because of his action when any action should be equally valid (and equally okay?) to the moral relativist. Saving ones own skin, leaving behind the innocent child (if that is, indeed, what he actually did) chaps my ass. Why? Because to my sense of morality he sucks as a grandparent, as a man and as a person for that action. I believe that it should be a rule (yes, as in universal) that adults protect children in that circumstance. It is all well and good to ascribe philosophy's and ideals or what have you, but as you say, what is.. is and the actions which the cartoonist took (whatever those were at that time) are just as valid hence just as agreeable to the moral relativist.. so, I'm not quite able to buy your argument as the argument of a moral relativist.

I don't think one can discuss philosophy (Kants chant or any other philosophy) without putting the thoughts to the test and action is a valid test to such thinking. Is it not logical to suppose that actions speak louder than words and what a person does supercedes what he says he does? Can we separate our actions from our ideals and when they contradict say that the thoughts win out over the actions? I don't believe so and without action to back the thoughts it really is all just words and talk is cheap, my friend. When push comes to shove and actions are required, are such actions more likely to come from the moral relativist who believes that all morals are equally valid or from someone who embraces a universal morality and is driven by a moral code which he believes should be a rule for all? I think there are plenty of examples throughout human history which point to both schools of thought so would not dismiss out of hand either moral stance as being a causal factor in everything from wars to fashion sense.

In moral relativsm, the ends have ever right to justify the means.. in a universal morality, they do not and never the twain shall meet.

edited again because I didn't actually need to edit the first time! ::makes note to get eyes checked::

< Message edited by BitaTruble -- 1/5/2010 8:47:44 PM >


_____________________________

"Oh, so it's just like
Rock, paper, scissors."

He laughed. "You are the wisest woman I know."


(in reply to Aswad)
Profile   Post #: 966
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 8:33:48 PM   
frazzle


Posts: 1212
Joined: 6/20/2009
Status: offline
I'm of the opinion, that our sense of humour might differ.

I am all for brownies/cookies being available for all

(in reply to Lucienne)
Profile   Post #: 967
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 8:41:28 PM   
Lucienne


Posts: 1175
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: frazzle

I'm of the opinion, that our sense of humour might differ.

I am all for brownies/cookies being available for all


Not enough elves, my dear. Not enough elves.

I get that you're joking. But Mensa members are pretty much beyond satire in my book. They're just too... absurd.

(in reply to frazzle)
Profile   Post #: 968
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 8:47:44 PM   
WinsomeDefiance


Posts: 6719
Joined: 8/7/2007
Status: offline
Hi Frazzle & Luscious,

My son, or one of them anyway, was supsended for telling his kindergarden teacher he needed to leave the classroom.  When she asked why, he said he had to defecate.  She thought he was making fun of her.

Another of my son's teacher wanted to hold him back a year, saying he was academically lagging behind all the other children.  When his test scores came back, he scored between 99%, and in a couple areas 100%  where the state and school's average was in the 40's.

The oddest thing, so far, I've faced with my children in school - was when my oldest son was suspended for taking up space.  I filed a complaint, and had him back in school that day.  I told the principal I wasn't going to allow my son to be punished for failing to defy the laws of physics.  This was after he was suspended for smiling.  That one I could understand.  My son had a way of being able to say "fuck you," with a mere smile.

After raising 3 boys in the school system, I opted to homeschool my youngest. 

< Message edited by WinsomeDefiance -- 1/5/2010 8:50:48 PM >

(in reply to frazzle)
Profile   Post #: 969
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 9:16:31 PM   
lusciouslips19


Posts: 9792
Joined: 9/8/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

Hi Frazzle & Luscious,

My son, or one of them anyway, was supsended for telling his kindergarden teacher he needed to leave the classroom. When she asked why, he said he had to defecate. She thought he was making fun of her.

Another of my son's teacher wanted to hold him back a year, saying he was academically lagging behind all the other children. When his test scores came back, he scored between 99%, and in a couple areas 100% where the state and school's average was in the 40's.

The oddest thing, so far, I've faced with my children in school - was when my oldest son was suspended for taking up space. I filed a complaint, and had him back in school that day. I told the principal I wasn't going to allow my son to be punished for failing to defy the laws of physics. This was after he was suspended for smiling. That one I could understand. My son had a way of being able to say "fuck you," with a mere smile.

After raising 3 boys in the school system, I opted to homeschool my youngest.


I consider myself lucky to be in a liberal and compassionate school district.. My son could have been suspended numerous times for losing control and threatening to shoot people or himself. He has gotten sent to the principle and had to write letters of apology to principle and kids and teachers.
Everyone knows he doesnt mean it and shows remorse. We have learned over his years in school that once he has lost it and has been affected by chaos, he loses it. He has been given permission to leave the chaos by teachers and social workers and the principle. Its a good thing he's finally recognizing the triggers as they wont tolerate that next year in middle school. There is a transition team that will be meeting with us. I am so very lucky to have an environment like this. The teachers think hes wonderful and a special kid. Maybe its him, maybe them, maybe both.

I feel for people who've had their children mistreated by subjective predjudice in the school system.

< Message edited by lusciouslips19 -- 1/5/2010 9:18:13 PM >


_____________________________

Original Pimpette,
Keeper of Original Home Flag and Fire of Mr. Lance Hughes
Charter member of Lance's Fag Hags,
Member of the Subbie Mafia
Princess of typos and it's my prerogative

(in reply to WinsomeDefiance)
Profile   Post #: 970
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 10:20:27 PM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88

That's what sales is, delivering the goods better than the next guy. Closing the deal.  It's fucking hard work. Glengarry Glen Ross, best movie ever on the ruthlessness of sales. It ain't Mary Kay we're talking about. Add to that this is Maine and it's very much a male dominated business, well....I earn my money.





Not to derail, but you are so right; Glengarry Glen Ross is the ultimate sales movie. I am in ruthless sales myself (NYC media biz) and believe me, you use everything at your disposal to sell in such a competitive market. I am always told that women are better at sales, but I have seen evidence that even with superior skill, some women do not get paid as much as their male counterparts, even in these supposedly enlightened times.





I love Glengarry.....I used to sell cars in california....anyone seen the movie used cars? Me = Rudy Russo and my boss was Jack Worden in the powder blue suit


I actually have that movie...LOL


_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 971
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/5/2010 10:35:04 PM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88

quote:

ORIGINAL: Loki45

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88




Take note, everyone. Here we have a clear example of someone without proper gun safety education.

Gun safety rule Number 1) The gun is always loaded, even if it's not. Never point the gun at anything you don't want to die....not even a camera because you think the picture would 'look cool.'

No wonder the 'gun control' nuts never shut up. They have so much photographic proof of the lack of gun safety awareness.


Oh silly Loki I grew up in a military family, I have shot my own food, defended my home and know all about gun safety. Yeah you caught me, I was trying to look cool. Well, at least it's the real deal not trying to "sound" cool. For fuck sake I have at least 8 handguns, a dozen shotguns, I don't even know how how many rifles, and more hours at  the target range than you have probably spent masturbating, so get over my "improper" handling for the photo shoot would you? Unless of course you have a gun like that, then ante up big boy. Seriously they don't call me Annie Oakley because my name is Ann. Is that the best you have, my improper stance for a fucking picture? How cool is that., What do you want next, the SKS or the brand new .357 I just got? Yeah thought so. You go ahead and hold your baseball bat "properly" meanwhile I'll fucking pull a Thelma and Lousie on the idiot that tries to break into my home.      



Not to mention, the gun isn't actually pointed AT the camera


_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to Aynne88)
Profile   Post #: 972
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/6/2010 5:53:37 AM   
Aynne88


Posts: 3873
Joined: 8/29/2008
Status: offline
No it was pointed at my Man, who took the picture. Hey what can I say, he says do it, I do it. Thanks GT.

_____________________________

As long as people will shed the blood of innocent creatures there can be no peace, no liberty, no harmony between people. Slaughter and justice cannot dwell together.
—Isaac Bashevis Singer, writer and Nobel laureate (1902–1991)



(in reply to GreedyTop)
Profile   Post #: 973
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/6/2010 6:09:01 AM   
zephyroftheNorth


Posts: 8159
Joined: 10/5/2009
From: The Great Frozen North
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aynne88

No it was pointed at my Man, who took the picture. Hey what can I say, he says do it, I do it. Thanks GT.


Well that's one way to get him to take a picture of you *giggles*


_____________________________

And there's a smile when the pain comes
The pain gonna make ev'rything alright ~ Black Crows

Team Troll Trollop
Member: Cocksuckers For World Peace
Charter member: Lance's Fag Hags
Member: Subbie Mafia
Member: Hibbie's Hotties

(in reply to Aynne88)
Profile   Post #: 974
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/6/2010 7:11:53 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: subtee

319 bitches

area code, so?


Me too!!!!!!!!!! Aren't we just the cool ones?!?!?

(literally...)


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to subtee)
Profile   Post #: 975
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/6/2010 8:00:06 AM   
Kimveri


Posts: 783
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Vegas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AnimusRex


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kimveri
My "IQ scores" have varied so far as 62 points & I've been accused of "cheating". *rolls eyes*



Funny thing- mine was estimated as being as high as 62 also, and I really was cheating.


Ummm...I didn't say the score was 62....I said they varied by that much. O,o

~K


_____________________________

"You get what you accept."

"It is always wise to examine the facts from all angles before one renders a summary judgement."~_Marcus_

(in reply to AnimusRex)
Profile   Post #: 976
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/6/2010 8:36:02 AM   
Aswad


Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23

How would any of you feel being treated like this?


Yanno, read the archives... a fair number of us have drawn enough fire to make Harry Callahan blink.

When a lot of people are shooting at you with no apparent collaboration, you have a review board.

If reviews are bad, you either fix the play, enjoy the outsider role, or go the route of Uwe Boll.

quote:

And fuck the first person who tries to say that a mob ganging up on one person for utterly piddly shit is fair or right.  You're a fucking creep if you think that.


C'mon... there's a difference between drawing fire and coming under fire.

If you honestly don't see why you're taking flak here, I'll be happy to start explaining.

Health,
al-Aswad.



_____________________________

"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind.
From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way.
We do.
" -- Rorschack, Watchmen.


(in reply to Psychonaut23)
Profile   Post #: 977
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/6/2010 8:41:38 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Daddy519

I'm new to the forums, and maybe its just the small sample size but I see some disturbing trends where posters seem to have a strong misogynistic leaning.

There's a part of me that thinks they are merely trolls seeking reaction, and if that's how they enjoy filling the emptiness in their lives the more power to them.

But...there is a part of me that wonders if some who truly hate women see BDSM as an outlet for their anger?

It lends credence to some articles I've read by the anti-BDSM crowd that all dominants are misogynists (these articles exclusively attribute dominance to males).  But we all know that's bullshit.

Is this a new phenomenon, Where places like CM have become venues in which misogyny can be worn like a badge?
Now that I've laid in some background, I can address this question: prejudice is apparently an adaptive trait - I recently read about a study that demonstrated that presented with an exemplar of a certain thing, the propensity is to extrapolate it as a general rule, and apply whatever reaction generated by a particular specimen to the entire class of similar objects as a rule.

Thus, if for instance, one perceives a threat to ones utility due to the actions of  a particular individual, the tendency is to predict similar behavior in similar individuals. It's a species of categorization, abstract assignment and classification of objects and phenomena according to their perceived characteristics: hot and cold, hard or soft, animal, vegetable or mineral, etc.

Abstraction is abstraction, and with experience, one typically begins to discover other distinctions, exceptions, overlaps, even common cause, if the object happens to be other people - if it becomes advantageous to exaggerate what be a minor irritation in any way, then that exaggeration will tend to be promoted and promulgated.

In the case of women, who by long tradition have been classified as chattel, some men feel their needs and desires, which they consider to be theirs by right, threatened and thwarted - the emancipation of women is very threatening to this sort of internalized construct of the "natural order" - they would very likely have the same reaction to similar behavior from a man, but since they cannot extrapolate this as a rule w/regard to "men", a class to which they themselves belong, they do make further taxonomic divisions, "conservative", "liberal", and often will associate the offending party with the class they are in conflict with, women in this case.

In most cases, it simply reflects everyday competition: external characteristics lend themselves to singling out statistically large numbers of competing individuals, and at the same time, reinforce group identity of whatever group vehicle one happens to be riding in.

Thus, your typical WASP male, having common cause with other similar individuals, will tend to identify with those individuals, and depending on the utility of it, may profess disgust at divergent "types" as a practical matter, i.e., whether or not he genuinely feels this way, or is convinced rationally of it - that's how group identity works.

This generally describes our relationship with other objects, and what you really have is a curve or continuum ranging from healthy disgust - women spend too much time in the bathroom, use inordinate quantities of paper products, etc., men think farts are funny and they're sloppy, etc. - to an internalized state of sociopathic animosity.

The latter is actually probably more rare than it might seem, most prejudice reflects some current class struggle in social politics, and there is and possibly always will be both militant forms of feminism, and a commensurate reaction formation of misogyny, real or presumed.

In short, we tend to identify with those similar to ourselves: men with men, women with women, children with children, etc., and the more political/social distinctions three are that affect our respective rights, privileges or options, the more exaggerated the identification becomes.

i.e., highly androcentric men will tend to see less radicalized men as quislings at best, and pussies most likely - i.e., when one has a strong identification with the masculine, feminization is the worst possible insult.

That's the kind of stealth misogyny that I find more disturbing, as it usually issues form those purporting to be defending "feminine virtue", and the underlying assumption is always one of feminine inferiority.

Of course, a lot of very intelligent women know this, and play the feminine role to the hilt, just as men can increase their chances of getting into a more independent minded woman's pants by being more realistic and fair minded.

In the end, it's all strategy sexual and economic, and generally not anything to get worked up about until it threatens to become institutionalized and create significant social-economic distortions - which it almost invariably does, as various individuals internalize what are essentially individualized strategies.

Since the thread went that way, it is naturally in the interest of some men to convince women they are all slaves by nature, and deride them for not acting like it (if they really were, they wouldn't need to act), but at the same time, there are women for whom this is actually kind of appealing, they are comfortable in a more passive role and everything works out more or less as you might expect: the people who are comfortable with it are comfortable with it, the people who aren't, argue or do something else

It works until they emerge into the larger community and start trying to market it as a broader, institutional value or preemptive model - reality - and run into people are decidedly not comfortable with it, and not at all passive on the subject of holding onto that for which they've fought long and hard to attain.

And round and round it goes.

< Message edited by xssve -- 1/6/2010 8:46:00 AM >

(in reply to Daddy519)
Profile   Post #: 978
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/6/2010 8:49:39 AM   
DarlingSavage


Posts: 2808
Joined: 9/18/2009
Status: offline
Brevity is the soul of wit.

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 979
RE: Misogyny and BDSM - 1/6/2010 8:55:47 AM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
There is enough of distinction between testosterone and estrogen influenced behavior to support a general sense that "men do and women are", i.e., active vs. passive, but at the same time a lot of people who have trouble with the concept that passivity is not a universally feminine trait, any more than aggression is a universally male one - i.e., the exceptions may perceptually threaten the rule of conformity to group identity.

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 980
Page:   <<   < prev  47 48 [49] 50 51   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Misogyny and BDSM Page: <<   < prev  47 48 [49] 50 51   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109