LafayetteLady
Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007 From: Northern New Jersey Status: offline
|
We disagree which is just fine, but my logic is not "nonsense." quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML This is just so much generalized garbage you are spouting. I can tell you from experience of teaching for 30 years and having responsibility for planning curriculum, implementing it by gathering all the materials for laboratory activity, evaluating student progress for more than 150 students, dealing with parental concerns and being overwhelmed by cya Adminstrative trivia, I spent plenty of long hours at home evenings and weekends hard at work. Additionally, we never asked for 100% paid benefits. All benefits were calculated as part of our salary package. You leave the impression they were some extra gravey when in fact the total dollar amount of the package depended on money made available by the State. I see you live in Florida. Is that where you taught for 30 years? I live in New Jersey and lived in Florida for two years. The best teacher my son ever had was there. He ignored his union contract and gave his time after school and during his lunch to help his students. He was indeed a rarity and a wonderful man. In your state, a teacher with a PhD can typically expect to max out their salary at about 50 grand a year. I agree, that is underpaid. Mind you I said "max out." In the state of New Jersey, the MEDIAN salary for a teacher WITHOUT an advanced degree is about 75K a year. Quite a difference. And yes, in NJ, those teachers at one time were bitching about having to contribute to their benefits. You are 64 years old now, according to your profile. You entered the teaching field when it was respected and young men and women entered it to help to educate young minds. The majority of those entering the teaching field now do it because they will have summers off and lots of holidays during the year. You can tell me I'm wrong all you want, but I've spoken to more than enough of them to know that is the truth. I have a son in high school. I see what the teachers in his school do and don't do. And what they don't do is a whole lot of work at home. For a teacher to complain about any of the work they have to do is like a nurse complaining about being around sick people. You knew what you were getting into when you started. Let's face reality here. The reason that most people WANT a government job is for the benefits and the boat load of holidays. It takes many years for someone who works for the Department of Social Services in the state of NJ to even reach a salary of 50K a year. They go into it for 2 reasons. One to have that government job and its benefits and two to get the experience for their resume to go into private practice. quote:
You denigrate unions for some while seeking them for others without thought that teachers and public employees would then suffer the same conditions as retail clerks. I agree that food service and retail should be unionized but teachers and public employees should not be penalized for their success. What I said is that those unions had outlived their usefulness. Do you honestly believe that public employees and teachers salaries would suddenly plummet if they weren't able to lobby for who they wanted as governor anymore? Because a whole shitload of money from the NJEA went to trying to strong arm its members into telling them who to vote for. I never said that teaching was an easy job. But what the unions keep lobbying for is to make their job easier and has very little to do with what is best for the kids they teach. quote:
And you don't seem to understand the reason there IS protection and there are Laws under DOL is because of the lobbying activities of Unions which you hold in contempt. You think the Federal Govt and the States and private businesses will give benefits and higher salary out of the goodness of their heart? These were hard won successes by the unions. What nonsense in your thinking! Yes, minimum wage was won by a union. However, have you ever read the DOL laws? Because these unions didn't fight for the rights of everyone, only themselves. Most of the laws are broken into various fields of employment, so the laws for the teachers and the teamsters aren't the same for others. The nonsense is thinking that the unions are continuing to fight for the rights of its members. They aren't. They have a totally different agenda which has nothing to do with making better working conditions.
|