lally2
Posts: 2621
Joined: 4/16/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: osf quote:
ORIGINAL: sexyred1 quote:
ORIGINAL: littlewonder quote:
A submissive woman’s sexuality is unceasing in it’s appetite and need. That sexual need is there. It can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever. I guess I'm not very submissive then because well..there are times when my sexuality does indeed come to a screeching halt..it dies on the concrete floor with a big loud bang! It's easily reasoned with and can find bargains at basement prices. And there are quite a few times when it feels pity and remorse and lots of times when it feels fear...more times than I wish. So yup..big load of bullshit. Yup, she is right. That truly is one of the most bullshitty things osf has ever said. Why? Not just because it is a sweeping generalization, but in my experience, the Doms I have been with feel the same way, their sexuality and need for us and our relationship matched mine and sometimes, surpassed it. So please, give me a break. Edited to add: what does that have to do with the OP's question? and here i thought we were getting along what does your post have with the ops question then again it's an allegory for some of my past experiences and maybe i knew some women that were in a submissive frame of mind all the time so far we have one in agreement and 3 against get over yourselves ladies, you don't represent all womanhood and some submissives are never out of role, they it seems instinctively react to their dom in a submissive way constantly and most men cant handle that for long and of course you are here looking , some for years for the man that can keep up to your oh so easy natures if submissives were so easily taken care of some of you wouldn't be here and every man could be a dominant but they can't wonder why that is again it is from my experience with a couple of women and i stand by it the blue bit - in the early years i would have said this was very true - i would have harped on about the men who just wanted kink but who had no innate Dominance and who mistakenly believed that i would happily submit all day long without an ounce of effort from them. my sexuality was rampant back then - i just had to have it and flipped into submission at the drop of a hat, didnt matter if they were dominant or not. looking back i wasnt submitting to them i was submitting to *my* need to submit. these days im a little better clued in to how it all works and i dont waste my time on the guys that have no innate dominance. Dominant men turn me on, for them its just who they are, no thought process required. so now the blue bit isnt true for me anymore.
_____________________________
So all I have to do in order to serve him, is to work out exactly how improbable he is, feed that figure into the finite improbability generator, give him a fresh cup of really hot tea ... and turn him on!
|