sodsta
Posts: 246
Joined: 7/19/2006 From: London, England Status: offline
|
Just to start us off, I'll say that I've always thought S&M (from the sadist's perspective) was pretty much just a way of allowing oneself to be a bit of a sociopath in a consensual setting. To me, the difference between a sociopath and a person with sociopathic urges is that an actual sociopath doesn't know how to control said urges. To a sociopath, those "urges" become a way of life, but I believe that most human beings harbour certain tendencies or desires that, if acted upon, would be considered sociopathic. How many of you have fantasised about killing your boss after a particularly annoying day at work? Or ramming a fork into your co-worker's eye because they keep stealing your stapler? Perfectly ordinary imaginings that I'm sure the vast majority of people have felt a number of times in their life, but... they're just fantasy. You'd never act them out, because that would make you a criminal. That's where S&M comes in. It gives people (sadists) an opportunity to indulge those sociopathic tendencies and urges in an environment where you KNOW you are safe. There is consent, there is desire on the part of the masochist, and an understanding that it will stop if it becomes too much. I'm certainly not trying to put a negative spin on S&M by using the term "sociopathic urges", because I rather like the idea of there being an actual space for that kind of release and realisation of suppressed desires. I was wondering, though, if other people felt the same way about S&M and sadism, or if they had other theories. I'd be interested to hear them. :) -- Kye
< Message edited by sodsta -- 2/5/2010 7:15:28 PM >
|