Falkenstein
Posts: 187
Joined: 7/22/2009 Status: offline
|
heartfelt, your words explaining (excusing?) your ex-husband are most gallant. I may sound utterly hypocritical, but I do not think that there should be such a strong correlation between sex, love and marriage. Marriage is a life-long commitment. It is kept alive and livable by friendship, care, a sense of duty, of being there for the other in good and in bad times. Love, alas, comes and go. Given our current live expectancy, to hope that it will last say 70 years is .. well just that, hope. The poster children of love, Romeo and Julia, were just that too: children, and their end shows to me no sense of responsibility. As for sex, well it should correlate with love and marriage, but if it does not and the rest go well.. As a priest, who is a good friend of mine, said, when God created sex as a way to reward love and to cement marriage, the life expectancy was a lot shorter, now we have to use other human forces, like friendship to keep a marriage going. Also, the occasions of mishaps growing with the years, we need to pardon more what was before unpardonable. This does not absolve us of trying hard to keep the right course, but one should not abandon the ship at the first leak (or for the culinary minded, abandon the sheep at the first leek?) I must sound like an alien to you (BTW, the decor of the movie Alien were made by a Swiss, and LSD is also a Swiss invention...) but I like to think my relation instead of "just" experiencing them. As for a DM/s relationship I have two measures of success: a minimal and an optimal one. The minimal was once explained to me by a submissive lady with excellent thinking, who post here from time to time: I will try to summarise her words so: A person would stay in a relationship if the emotional balance for her/him is kept positive and better than other alternative. For example, a sub will stay in a relation will a dominant treating her moderately well or even imposing her things she really do not like if, all in all, the relationship has enough positive aspects to counterbalance the negative ones. The dominant, assuming he is completely in control of what happens in the relationship (a big if, in my experience), can optimize his pleasure as long he keeps his sub just satisfied enough not to leave. This I call a Porsche / Nissan Micra relationship: The dominant drives a Porsche to work, the sub a Micra, she has the bare minimum, he has most of the relation, but both get enough. My goal in any relation is to make sure that a) the maximum of pleasure and fulfillment is obtained, and b) that this pleasure and fulfillment is shared equally between both partners, to take the picture from above: He drives Audi, she is underway in her BMW, different pleasures, but equal Fahrvergnügen, at least on dry roads. This ideal of equality is already difficult to reach in a vanilla relationship where both parties have equals voices, it becomes very illusive when the partner says: "do with this slave what you want" or " i just want to please you".
_____________________________
Henry, Part of that power which still Produceth good, whilst ever scheming ill.
|