heartfeltsub
Posts: 1641
Joined: 11/5/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NihilusZero quote:
ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael There is a huge difference between doing the internal work to be fully functional on your own and being co-dependant so that you NEED someone to be fully functional. Yes and no. There is a night-and-day difference for those who have not yet found a situation that is likely to be constant. There is no discernible difference if the two people are already in such a situation. The only solid concern I can drum up is whether someone becomes so psychologically crippled by the loss of a need that suicide becomes a recurring prevalent mindset. Otherwise, it's just a matter of one person needing a wider support center than the next. quote:
ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael Or to put it in "relationship math" one is: 1/2 + 1 = 1.5 and the other is 1 + 1 = 3 There are no "half people"; there are people who we each might think would be a detractor to us in a relationship. *Bolded and edited for brevity and clarity sake The first comments that you made that there is a a big difference between needing to be with "someone", better put anyone when not in a relationship and needing someone after having established a relationship is something that i would wholeheartedly agree with and is also at the heart of some of the fears that i have addressed in this thread. i don't know if i have ever been one that "HAD" to be with someone to feel whole. i know that some people are in that place. And it seems to me that being in that place is a much more dangerous place than having fears that might inhibit intimacy, because those who i have known like that tend to choose poorly. The needing of someone after having spent most of one's life with them, in my case married 23 years, dated for 2 years prior to that, so when getting divorced at 41 almost 42, i had known him for well over half my life as he was (to that point) the only man i had ever dated, kissed, had sex with, etc. So the devastation when he left did leave me suicidal for a while. i couldn't imagine a life without him in it. And that was one of the fears that i had previously mentioned. However due to the fact that i met him when i was still so young and really unformed, (there may be people whose character and personality is fully formed at 16, but i wasn't one of them) and he was such an integral part of my life, father of my kids, etc. i don't know if i would ever feel quite as bereft again, so lost and adrift with no anchor anymore.if a subsequent, though equally intimate relationship might end by whatever means (death, divorce, etc.) While there is a part of me that would like to go into a D/s relationship where i wouldn't have to "worry" about it getting too intimate, or having to be too vulnerable, or exposing who i am at the core too much (meaning having to do it when i feel the most raw and in my opinion of myself weak), there would be no fear. But then i would be in control, which would make me "feel" safer, but it would also not be the type of relationship that i want. i do, although it is with knocking knees, want to give up that control, want to be that close to another person. i just really also want to actually have him catch me when i fall, because i know that sometime, i will fall. Taken from a different post of yours NZ, may i ask is that something that you had to consider when you were trying to find that line, or because you are coming from the Dominant perspective, could you or do you have the "right" (not the best word there because of course as the D type you would have the right whether you used it or not would be a different story) to hide portions of yourself? * Edited to add these thoughts Part of what i read when Michael was talking about half a person, was someone who feels that the only way he or she can be whole is if he or she is in a relationship with another person. They HAVE to be with someone, and then because they have no sense of wholeness or fulfillment in and of themselves, they can drain the life out of the other person and out of the relationship, constantly looking to the other person to make them something, happy, content, worth something, etc. i know that technically that does not make them half of a person, but it has always been my philosophy that i need to be as whole as i can as a person (hence the point of this thread) to be able to give to someone the best me i can be at that point in my life. While i do not think i will ever attain "perfect" wholeness, it is my goal, my drive, to continually, as things arise, work of those areas of my life where fear or past wounds are reigning. As i also think that too much introspection can be just as much a trap as too little, i don't try to find all the weaknesses that could possibly exist in me, doing an endless search of self-improvement, but i wait to see what comes to the surface, starts to affect my life or comes to my attention and then address those items at that point. Part of what brought all this home to me as something i needed to deal with, because i was just fine being "just" (please realize i am NOT saying a submissive is any less or greater than a slave, i am trying to make a different point) a submissive and always being a very obedient, service oriented submissive, but not a slave, until a slave retreat at a friend's house. While a discussion about slavery, etc was going on, and i made my normal, i don't identify as a slave speech, it became clear to me that it was fear that made me say that. Once i realized it was fear that had me adamantly keeping that position, the position became one i was no longer comfortable with maintaining. i don't let fear win. To me, the "not whole person" which i used to be in spades and still see that i am, is one ruled by fears and wounds of the past and is looking for someone else to fix them, instead of doing the work to fix themselves. i don't want to be that person ever again. Thanks again for all the replies, heartfelt
< Message edited by heartfeltsub -- 3/2/2010 2:23:58 PM >
_____________________________
Life is an exciting business, and most exciting when it is lived for others. Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood. Life is either a great adventure or nothing. Helen Keller 50 NZ points
|