mcbride
Posts: 333
Joined: 1/14/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: maybemaybenot I would agree that his opinion on the Viet Nam war was sown from his religious views, but the speech itself was not a sermon, it was a speech at a church to denounce the war. I speak at churches and temples about slavery < the real kind, not this kind > while my own personal crusade against it has some rooting in my religious beliefs, my activism work is not of a religious nature. That's very cool, btw...I was just researching some human trafficking stuff. But about that speech: Even as a minister of God, speaking in a church, at a meeting of Clergy and Laity Concerned, he was pretty explicit about... "[having] to live with the meaning of my commitment to the ministry of Jesus Christ. To me the relationship of this ministry to the making of peace is so obvious that I sometimes marvel at those who ask me why I am speaking against the war. Could it be that they do not know that the good news was meant for all men -- for Communist and capitalist, for their children and ours, for black and for white, for revolutionary and conservative? Have they forgotten that my ministry is in obedience to the one who loved his enemies so fully that he died for them? What then can I say to the "Vietcong" or to Castro or to Mao as a faithful minister of this one? Can I threaten them with death or must I not share with them my life?" There's more on that theme, but I think his context is fairly clear, no? Full text All of which is probably more important for the OP to understand, as it relates to responsibility.
|