Andalusite
Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009 Status: offline
|
heartfelt, when I was looking last, I was open to a man of *any* BDSM or D/s orientation, but was actively more wary of Dominants and Masters than sadists, Tops, switches, or men on the bottom/submissive spectrum. However, instead of making it a blanket "no, not interested," I interacted with each person individually, and if things seemed promising, I asked a ton of questions about their approach to D/s and/or M/s, what they saw as the difference between the two, how they envisioned our day-to-day lives going, what their expectations of me were, and lots of other things. Similarly, I tried to get more information about any specific areas I might be concerned about. For example, I'm not much into humiliation, on either side of things. So, if someone expressed a major interest in that within their profile, but they otherwise were intriguing enough, I'd ask what they specifically meant by it. For example, some D-types felt that kneeling, crawling, and blowjobs were humiliating! *giggles* I don't view them that way, so I had to find out more - would they need *me* to feel humiliated by it, or were they just drawn to my doing those things, etc. It was important to me to use a relationship descriptor that actually fit our dynamic - I have no problem being in a top/bottom relationship, but I would call it that, not call someone my "slave" because he comes to clean my house once a week, for example. In my last relationship, my Dominant sometimes referred to me as his slave (or had me call him Master) during play, but we were very definite about our dynamic actually being D/s instead. That was just "hot talk." With my Master, I felt that we had enough of an ownership dynamic, and he was expecting control of me in enough areas, that I was comfortable with meeting his expectations of a slave. Someone else might consider the exact same level of power exchange to be D/s instead, and that is fine for their relationships. They don't get any say in mine. My Master let me know that he strongly preferred a M/s dynamic rather than D/s, and we dated for about 2 months before I became his slave, to allow time to get to know each other, develop trust, and so forth. He would not have been interested in top/bottom relationship, so if I hadn't reacted submissively toward him, we would not have been compatible for a relationship, even though I could have had that kind of dynamic with someone else. So, it was kind of a combination of the specific person and whether or not I fit into his dynamic, but the dynamic was important as well with respect to that *specific* relationship, even though it didn't matter much to me in general. Since so many Masters, especially here in the forums, have "one strike and you're out" dynamics, I assumed that I would not have been compatible with any of them. Even if our kinks were a good match, we had chemistry, they were intelligent and interesting, and so forth, as soon as I discovered that someone had that rule, I knew they were not an option. If I'm submissive toward someone, I try my level best to do what they want and be what they want. Having that threat hanging over my head would make me constantly fearful of messing up. I know I'm not perfect. My Master doesn't take that approach, but feels that a pattern of disobedience might indeed indicate incompatibility, or a major problem, or just that I'm not submissive to him. I have no problem with that, and agree with him.
< Message edited by Andalusite -- 3/22/2010 9:14:25 PM >
|