Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Why M/s?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Why M/s? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 1:24:42 PM   
wisdomtogive


Posts: 636
Joined: 11/13/2009
Status: offline
Heartfeltsub
I really do feel the need to commend you for doing all these threads. In my opinion, it takes a lot of strength to put yourself out like this.I wish that I could say I do not know the fear you speak of, but I do.

I am proud of you for not letting fear be your Master, yet the journey is very difficult. What I want to say is whatever direction you end up taking may you find the type of Dominant who has really Master themselves and can cherish the submissive within you. In the mean time, what are doing, working within to see how to tick is marvelous.

If creating threads is helping you, then please continue.  I did that a couple years back under oceanwynds, and some people on here were able to shine a lot of light on subjects confusing me. If it wasn't for them, I might have been lost in my journey.  Through a lot of delving and asking questions, i came naturally into embracing my desire to not hold back any more. Whew, what a milestone for this tough old scared bird:).

_____________________________

Happily owned by MstrDark1

(in reply to heartfeltsub)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 1:54:42 PM   
heartfeltsub


Posts: 1641
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline
Wisdom,

Thank you for your comments. i think i have at least one more thread in me (grinning). The responses have been very helpful to me.

heartfelt

_____________________________

Life is an exciting business, and most exciting when it is lived for others.

Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood.

Life is either a great adventure or nothing.

Helen Keller

50 NZ points

(in reply to wisdomtogive)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 2:17:06 PM   
lally2


Posts: 2621
Joined: 4/16/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: heartfeltsub

Andalusite,

For you, it was the person, not the dynamic as well. Would that be correct?

heartfelt


i am 100% certain that it is always the person (not wanting to speak for Adalusite here) by answering youre question to her.  but in a way the dynamic is the person, they are the one directing it - if the person and the dynamic they develop around you the individual, taking on board all that you are, all that youre fearful of and all that you wish to give, then youre home and dry.

_____________________________

So all I have to do in order to serve him, is to work out exactly how improbable he is, feed that figure into the finite improbability generator, give him a fresh cup of really hot tea ... and turn him on!

(in reply to heartfeltsub)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 2:24:40 PM   
heartfeltsub


Posts: 1641
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lally2

quote:

ORIGINAL: heartfeltsub

Andalusite,

For you, it was the person, not the dynamic as well. Would that be correct?

heartfelt


i am 100% certain that it is always the person (not wanting to speak for Adalusite here) by answering youre question to her.  but in a way the dynamic is the person, they are the one directing it - if the person and the dynamic they develop around you the individual, taking on board all that you are, all that youre fearful of and all that you wish to give, then youre home and dry.


Lally,

You are correct, it should always be the person, i just know that until now, if someone identified as a Master, then i stopped looking at them, because of the fear. If the same person told me that he was a Dominant or didn't try to complete Master me, i was more at peace with them.

Looking forward to home and dry (grinning)

Thanks for your reply,
heartfelt

_____________________________

Life is an exciting business, and most exciting when it is lived for others.

Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood.

Life is either a great adventure or nothing.

Helen Keller

50 NZ points

(in reply to lally2)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 5:00:50 PM   
beej


Posts: 145
Joined: 1/24/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wisdomtogive

Heartfeltsub
I really do feel the need to commend you for doing all these threads. In my opinion, it takes a lot of strength to put yourself out like this.I wish that I could say I do not know the fear you speak of, but I do.

I am proud of you for not letting fear be your Master, yet the journey is very difficult. What I want to say is whatever direction you end up taking may you find the type of Dominant who has really Master themselves and can cherish the submissive within you. In the mean time, what are doing, working within to see how to tick is marvelous.


i completely agree with this. i had little to add to this thread since i've not been in an M/s relationship, but the strength engendered in the responses here have been very inspiring. i was particularly moved by the posts from UniqueRaven and KnightOfMists. when you expressed the organic nature of your involvement in M/s, you were both/all bringing you authentic selves so much to your relations that it was really moving to read your accounts. i did quite a bit of introspection as a result, and i just want to thank you, OP and all, for your contributions on behalf of those of us who take it in even if we have little to give back. :)

(in reply to wisdomtogive)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 5:41:53 PM   
ishyB


Posts: 555
Joined: 9/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dominasola

As an added thought:  I DON'T necessarily want an M/s relationship...I just want my relationship with HIM. If I were to ever, for whatever reason, find myself unattached in the future, I wouldn't end up actively seeking a relationship in which the M/s dynamic exists.  I would simply try to find someone who is able to produce the same level of transparency and vulnerability that I naturally give.  Perhaps only people who (intentionally or not) identify as *Masters* are able to do that (although, I don't necessarily believe that), but my primary concern is the person him/herself, not the dynamic he or she may prescribe to.



That's exactly how I feel about it too.

I don't necessarily want an M/s relationship.
I honestly don't care about the label "slave" or what he wishes to define our relationship like, or how others define it.
If Master took my collar off tomorrow, told me I was no longer his slave, and I was no longer to call him Master, not much -if anything- in the way I relate to him would change.
He would still be able to command me as his, simple because he naturally compels that from me.
It is THAT which I look for in men, not the label that they call themselves, or label the relationship they want to be in.

There are too many men out there titling themselves "Master" who couldn't begin to compel such a responds from me, and too many men who haven't even heard about M/s before, who could elect such a response from me, to be too concerned with how to label my primal need to be with somebody who is able to take the lead.

I wish you well,

ishy


_____________________________

I want you to know that it doesn't matter where we take this road
Someone's gotta go
and I want you to know you couldn't have loved me better
But I wanted to move on
So I'm already gone

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoJFn_RIdkg

(in reply to Dominasola)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 7:07:10 PM   
lovingpet


Posts: 4270
Joined: 6/19/2005
Status: offline
~FR~  without reading responses intentionally 

It is a funny question to me in that I never really wanted the M/s dynamic.  I probably still wouldn't if it were that same abstraction that I had in my head only about a month ago.  My partner had called me "slave" for a long time already, but I didn't claim it myself.  As a matter of fact, I was on here posting thread after thread of all the reasons why not and how that term just didn't fit me.  The notion in my head was that so much of me, who I am, what I love in life, and more would just be gone upon accepting a slave designation.  I felt like it was a very heavy word that carried with it an extremism that scared me along with feeling like it was higher in the submissive "pecking order" than I ever thought I could or even wanted to attain.  I had a lot of concerns about being lesser, unequal, incompetent, and other such things due to the level of control I seemed to be finding myself needing.  I wasn't comfortable with it at all and was truly terrified by the whole thing.  I was afraid of not meeting his expectations.  I was afraid of there being some kind of sudden change in him and our relationship that would send me down a path that I couldn't handle.  I was afraid of losing my way to the point of never being able to get out if such a time came.  Yes, if that abstract concept of slave were still in my head I would still be fighting it with every fiber of my being.

Something in the whole paradigm shifted for me about a month ago.  It was a sudden shift and not even a light bulb moment thing either.  The whole mystery was wrapped up in just who this person is that controls me.  It determines how I respond to him.  I think when the fit is right and you are finally absolutely sure of the fact that the person is good, responsible, and maybe even in love, it changes everything.  I finally had all the confirmation I needed in that moment and all of a sudden I knew that my fears were misplaced, that I DID know his expectations, and that I was only the more valued in his eyes instead of disrespected.  I knew I could trust him with anything and everything.  That made whatever this thing was that we had together okay.

We attach a lot of things to certain word.  I am not one to like labels all that much, so it is so strange that this one got so overloaded with meaning in the first place.  In the end, I don't care what my designation is.  I am happily his and that's all that matters to me now.

lovingpet 




_____________________________

If you put your head into more, you'd have to put your back into less. ~Me

10 Fluffy pts.


(in reply to KnightofMists)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 7:59:34 PM   
kyraofMists


Posts: 3292
Joined: 7/29/2005
Status: offline
I have not read all the replies to this...

I did not choose M/s; I chose him. I don't know any other way of interacting with him other than to do his will. Even if it isn't a choice that I would have made myself, it is much more fulfilling to do his will than it is to make my own choices.

It is his character that made me want to be in a relationship with him. The fact that the relationship is M/s is really secondary to who he is as a person.

Knight's Kyra

_____________________________

"Passion... it lies in all of us. Sleeping, waiting, and though unbidden, it will stir, open its jaws, and howl. It speaks to us, guides us... passion rules us all. And we obey..." ~Angelus

(in reply to heartfeltsub)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 8:08:05 PM   
lovingpet


Posts: 4270
Joined: 6/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kyraofMists

I have not read all the replies to this...

I did not choose M/s; I chose him. I don't know any other way of interacting with him other than to do his will. Even if it isn't a choice that I would have made myself, it is much more fulfilling to do his will than it is to make my own choices.

It is his character that made me want to be in a relationship with him. The fact that the relationship is M/s is really secondary to who he is as a person.

Knight's Kyra


Exactly!

_____________________________

If you put your head into more, you'd have to put your back into less. ~Me

10 Fluffy pts.


(in reply to kyraofMists)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 8:27:45 PM   
osf


Posts: 3288
Joined: 10/19/2009
Status: offline
We don't get into a d/s m/s style relationship because of someone else's character we get into it because of our own character and and seek consciously or subcutaneously a complimentary character

Some, before becoming aware may be in a relationship and serendipitously find that the other person is exactly what they need, anyway it is we ourselves that drive us.

I don't think we can be created by someone else, we can only become aware or awakened by someone.

< Message edited by osf -- 3/22/2010 8:29:20 PM >


_____________________________

all around nice guy and creative misogynist

i'm not very skilled so i just hit harder

i want a woman to make into the woman she never wanted to become

(in reply to lovingpet)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 8:37:32 PM   
lovingpet


Posts: 4270
Joined: 6/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

We don't get into a d/s m/s style relationship because of someone else's character we get into it because of our own character and and seek consciously or subcutaneously a complimentary character

Some, before becoming aware may be in a relationship and serendipitously find that the other person is exactly what they need, anyway it is we ourselves that drive us.

I don't think we can be created by someone else, we can only become aware or awakened by someone.


But that's not what makes it "okay".  I can need an M/s dynamic knowingly or unknowingly, but unless my partner is of good character and someone I can trust and open myself to in that way, it really isn't going to matter.  What makes it okay is that I know I am safe to be that vulnerable and to let go of that much control.  That is why it can even be an M/s dynamic.  Honestly, the measure of how much I can submit is how much I trust.  How much I trust is completely dependent upon the person's character. 

lovingpet     

_____________________________

If you put your head into more, you'd have to put your back into less. ~Me

10 Fluffy pts.


(in reply to osf)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 9:10:22 PM   
Andalusite


Posts: 2492
Joined: 1/25/2009
Status: offline
heartfelt, when I was looking last, I was open to a man of *any* BDSM or D/s orientation, but was actively more wary of Dominants and Masters than sadists, Tops, switches, or men on the bottom/submissive spectrum. However, instead of making it a blanket "no, not interested," I interacted with each person individually, and if things seemed promising, I asked a ton of questions about their approach to D/s and/or M/s, what they saw as the difference between the two, how they envisioned our day-to-day lives going, what their expectations of me were, and lots of other things.

Similarly, I tried to get more information about any specific areas I might be concerned about. For example, I'm not much into humiliation, on either side of things. So, if someone expressed a major interest in that within their profile, but they otherwise were intriguing enough, I'd ask what they specifically meant by it. For example, some D-types felt that kneeling, crawling, and blowjobs were humiliating! *giggles* I don't view them that way, so I had to find out more - would they need *me* to feel humiliated by it, or were they just drawn to my doing those things, etc.

It was important to me to use a relationship descriptor that actually fit our dynamic - I have no problem being in a top/bottom relationship, but I would call it that, not call someone my "slave" because he comes to clean my house once a week, for example. In my last relationship, my Dominant sometimes referred to me as his slave (or had me call him Master) during play, but we were very definite about our dynamic actually being D/s instead. That was just "hot talk." With my Master, I felt that we had enough of an ownership dynamic, and he was expecting control of me in enough areas, that I was comfortable with meeting his expectations of a slave. Someone else might consider the exact same level of power exchange to be D/s instead, and that is fine for their relationships. They don't get any say in mine. My Master let me know that he strongly preferred a M/s dynamic rather than D/s, and we dated for about 2 months before I became his slave, to allow time to get to know each other, develop trust, and so forth. He would not have been interested in top/bottom relationship, so if I hadn't reacted submissively toward him, we would not have been compatible for a relationship, even though I could have had that kind of dynamic with someone else. So, it was kind of a combination of the specific person and whether or not I fit into his dynamic, but the dynamic was important as well with respect to that *specific* relationship, even though it didn't matter much to me in general.

Since so many Masters, especially here in the forums, have "one strike and you're out" dynamics, I assumed that I would not have been compatible with any of them. Even if our kinks were a good match, we had chemistry, they were intelligent and interesting, and so forth, as soon as I discovered that someone had that rule, I knew they were not an option. If I'm submissive toward someone, I try my level best to do what they want and be what they want. Having that threat hanging over my head would make me constantly fearful of messing up. I know I'm not perfect. My Master doesn't take that approach, but feels that a pattern of disobedience might indeed indicate incompatibility, or a major problem, or just that I'm not submissive to him. I have no problem with that, and agree with him.

< Message edited by Andalusite -- 3/22/2010 9:14:25 PM >

(in reply to lovingpet)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Why M/s? - 3/22/2010 10:31:44 PM   
osf


Posts: 3288
Joined: 10/19/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovingpet

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

We don't get into a d/s m/s style relationship because of someone else's character we get into it because of our own character and and seek consciously or subcutaneously a complimentary character

Some, before becoming aware may be in a relationship and serendipitously find that the other person is exactly what they need, anyway it is we ourselves that drive us.

I don't think we can be created by someone else, we can only become aware or awakened by someone.


But that's not what makes it "okay".  I can need an M/s dynamic knowingly or unknowingly, but unless my partner is of good character and someone I can trust and open myself to in that way, it really isn't going to matter.  What makes it okay is that I know I am safe to be that vulnerable and to let go of that much control.  That is why it can even be an M/s dynamic.  Honestly, the measure of how much I can submit is how much I trust.  How much I trust is completely dependent upon the person's character. 

lovingpet     



which is what i meant by complimentary but could have said it better

it's not enough that they be a polar opposite in outlook, they have to compliment us, ie be someone that we feel right with




_____________________________

all around nice guy and creative misogynist

i'm not very skilled so i just hit harder

i want a woman to make into the woman she never wanted to become

(in reply to lovingpet)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Why M/s? - 3/23/2010 2:54:44 AM   
heartfeltsub


Posts: 1641
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lovingpet

~FR~  without reading responses intentionally 

It is a funny question to me in that I never really wanted the M/s dynamic.  I probably still wouldn't if it were that same abstraction that I had in my head only about a month ago.  My partner had called me "slave" for a long time already, but I didn't claim it myself.  As a matter of fact, I was on here posting thread after thread of all the reasons why not and how that term just didn't fit me.  The notion in my head was that so much of me, who I am, what I love in life, and more would just be gone upon accepting a slave designation.  I felt like it was a very heavy word that carried with it an extremism that scared me along with feeling like it was higher in the submissive "pecking order" than I ever thought I could or even wanted to attain.  I had a lot of concerns about being lesser, unequal, incompetent, and other such things due to the level of control I seemed to be finding myself needing.  I wasn't comfortable with it at all and was truly terrified by the whole thing.  I was afraid of not meeting his expectations.  I was afraid of there being some kind of sudden change in him and our relationship that would send me down a path that I couldn't handle.  I was afraid of losing my way to the point of never being able to get out if such a time came.  Yes, if that abstract concept of slave were still in my head I would still be fighting it with every fiber of my being.

Something in the whole paradigm shifted for me about a month ago.  It was a sudden shift and not even a light bulb moment thing either.  The whole mystery was wrapped up in just who this person is that controls me.  It determines how I respond to him.  I think when the fit is right and you are finally absolutely sure of the fact that the person is good, responsible, and maybe even in love, it changes everything.  I finally had all the confirmation I needed in that moment and all of a sudden I knew that my fears were misplaced, that I DID know his expectations, and that I was only the more valued in his eyes instead of disrespected.  I knew I could trust him with anything and everything.  That made whatever this thing was that we had together okay.

We attach a lot of things to certain word.  I am not one to like labels all that much, so it is so strange that this one got so overloaded with meaning in the first place.  In the end, I don't care what my designation is.  I am happily his and that's all that matters to me now.

lovingpet 





Thank you so much for yuor reply lovingpet. All of it is really powerful. If i were NZ i would give you points. Exceedingly well said and it really spoke to me.

Thank you,
heartfelt

_____________________________

Life is an exciting business, and most exciting when it is lived for others.

Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood.

Life is either a great adventure or nothing.

Helen Keller

50 NZ points

(in reply to lovingpet)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Why M/s? - 3/23/2010 2:57:47 AM   
heartfeltsub


Posts: 1641
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

We don't get into a d/s m/s style relationship because of someone else's character we get into it because of our own character and and seek consciously or subcutaneously a complimentary character

Some, before becoming aware may be in a relationship and serendipitously find that the other person is exactly what they need, anyway it is we ourselves that drive us.

I don't think we can be created by someone else, we can only become aware or awakened by someone.


i agree wholeheartedly with this post, i think that is why for the previous two posters the term it is more fulfulling to do his will than mine is the case, because internally they are fulfilled by doing the will of another.

heartfelt

_____________________________

Life is an exciting business, and most exciting when it is lived for others.

Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood.

Life is either a great adventure or nothing.

Helen Keller

50 NZ points

(in reply to osf)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Why M/s? - 3/23/2010 3:03:05 AM   
heartfeltsub


Posts: 1641
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline
Andalusite,

Thank you for your reply. When one is "looking" there is a whole range of different types of people to deal with. i know that some of thiis can not be dealt with until i am face to face with the person who like Kyra and Lovingpet said, that some of this is abstract. What is different is until i reached that point of trust with someone who is looking for an M/s relationship, i won't have that fear screaming at me internally, to cut short any possibility of a relationship before it could have a chance to start.

Thank you again,
heartfelt

_____________________________

Life is an exciting business, and most exciting when it is lived for others.

Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood.

Life is either a great adventure or nothing.

Helen Keller

50 NZ points

(in reply to Andalusite)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Why M/s? - 3/23/2010 5:00:45 AM   
MilesNY


Posts: 6
Joined: 3/21/2010
Status: offline
Take this with a grain of salt since I am a complete newbie but maybe that helped me. I only had an idea of the relationship I wanted I had no idea of the labels for it. Now I say D/s is our dynamic simply because that's what he calls it but to be honest it sounds more like M/s in the way that is described on this thread. I guess the title just isn't important to me. He is also my boyfriend, lover, friend and lots of other things. There isn't a part of my life he couldn't controll should he see fit to. I wanted to be his because after taking sometime to get to know him as a person on a friendship level and the type of man he is, I have complete trust in his character and judgement and in the end we were on the same page as far as what we were looking for in a relationship. To be honest I don't even think about it anymore, it is just how things are and the only thing that matters is I am the happiest I have ever been. I am most at peace making him happy in whatever way he needs. I am still the fiesty, fun loving, independent girl I always was, being his adds to who I am as a complete person, it doesn't take away from me. Being owed for me has been one of the most freeing experiences of my life. Plus we love the kinky sex! ;-)

I hope you find what you are looking for no matter what it ends up being called.

(in reply to heartfeltsub)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Why M/s? - 3/23/2010 6:16:42 AM   
lally2


Posts: 2621
Joined: 4/16/2009
Status: offline
... just from the posts on this page i realised something cognitavely that i know i already knew but had not seen it in black and white, but it is such an important point and so valid

people get so wrapped up in finding a Dominant or a submissive rather than a person.  they get caught up with all the labels and what they are and how they should respond, according to the label they percieve to be most attuned to and seek to find the Domination or submission most suited to them and up to a point thats important, of course - but not to the detrminent or the forgetting that first and foremost its the human being you must relate to first.

i used to be one who thought labels were important, it helped us to identify who we were, as much to ourselves as anything.  the pride of being a submissive woman and carrying that title (kinda thing). 

then there are posts about 'how should i communicate on here' and 'im just being myself, but its not working'

we absorb the words written down here and take it all in as some sort of universal truth surrounding this world of ours.  but its just people finding their way through a myriad of misonceptions and contradictions.

i know that ive done my fair share of absorbing other peoples truths before finding my own - that takes time, because as we go we absorb other peoples perspectives and experiences and some of that colours our own path and approach and sometimes it distracts us away from what we think or believe.

this thread in a way is a perfect example of that - a brilliant thread btw, and ill join wisdom in her praise and gratitude for the threads you come up with hearty - but even so, youre path, youre way, learning from others, you take what you need, discard the rest, apply it to youre horizon and on you go.

but in the end it eventually boils down to what we already know.  boy meets girl, they get on, they share similar interests, goals and dreams, they give it their best shot

what im trying to say hearty, is that when you meet a man you like and enjoy being with and he likes you and enjoys being with you none of this matters beyond what you two wish to build for each other.

you mentioned earlier or somewhere else that its the fear of making the wrong choice - well, get in the boat with me hunny - i can tell you some stories that would curl youre toes  - i guess alot of us could, but my history of wrong choices began long before i identified with this set up.

what youre doing is vital, because youre gradually understanding that titles mean nothing at all.  theyre just ways to identify with youreself and for others to identify with themselves.  forget the guys who hide behind the title Master, forget the title slave - in the end we are of a submissive personality, how far that submission might go, within the auspices of a good man who happens to be of a Dominant personality is up to you both.

it is a state of being that develops as the relationship develops and as you both grow and learn together.  its not something to be fearful of so long as you dont get youreself tangled up with a 'kneel bitch or ill beat you' type.

the guys that have got my submission are the ones that have instilled trust and faith in their decision making, my enslavement to them was not dragged from me, i gave it, willingly because i felt safe to do so.  beyond that relationships work or they dont work, but the premis was right, the emotions were right and im still in touch with the ones that meant the most to me.

all im trying to say, convolutedly is that you shouldnt be scared off by titles - only the ones who think that a title gives them the right to behave like asshats - but youre too smart for them anyway.

_____________________________

So all I have to do in order to serve him, is to work out exactly how improbable he is, feed that figure into the finite improbability generator, give him a fresh cup of really hot tea ... and turn him on!

(in reply to MilesNY)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Why M/s? - 3/23/2010 6:51:34 AM   
osf


Posts: 3288
Joined: 10/19/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: lally2

... just from the posts on this page i realised something cognitavely that i know i already knew but had not seen it in black and white, but it is such an important point and so valid

people get so wrapped up in finding a Dominant or a submissive rather than a person.  they get caught up with all the labels and what they are and how they should respond, according to the label they percieve to be most attuned to and seek to find the Domination or submission most suited to them and up to a point thats important, of course - but not to the detrminent or the forgetting that first and foremost its the human being you must relate to first.

i used to be one who thought labels were important, it helped us to identify who we were, as much to ourselves as anything.  the pride of being a submissive woman and carrying that title (kinda thing). 

then there are posts about 'how should i communicate on here' and 'im just being myself, but its not working'

we absorb the words written down here and take it all in as some sort of universal truth surrounding this world of ours.  but its just people finding their way through a myriad of misonceptions and contradictions.

i know that ive done my fair share of absorbing other peoples truths before finding my own - that takes time, because as we go we absorb other peoples perspectives and experiences and some of that colours our own path and approach and sometimes it distracts us away from what we think or believe.

this thread in a way is a perfect example of that - a brilliant thread btw, and ill join wisdom in her praise and gratitude for the threads you come up with hearty - but even so, youre path, youre way, learning from others, you take what you need, discard the rest, apply it to youre horizon and on you go.

but in the end it eventually boils down to what we already know.  boy meets girl, they get on, they share similar interests, goals and dreams, they give it their best shot

what im trying to say hearty, is that when you meet a man you like and enjoy being with and he likes you and enjoys being with you none of this matters beyond what you two wish to build for each other.

you mentioned earlier or somewhere else that its the fear of making the wrong choice - well, get in the boat with me hunny - i can tell you some stories that would curl youre toes  - i guess alot of us could, but my history of wrong choices began long before i identified with this set up.

what youre doing is vital, because youre gradually understanding that titles mean nothing at all.  theyre just ways to identify with youreself and for others to identify with themselves.  forget the guys who hide behind the title Master, forget the title slave - in the end we are of a submissive personality, how far that submission might go, within the auspices of a good man who happens to be of a Dominant personality is up to you both.

it is a state of being that develops as the relationship develops and as you both grow and learn together.  its not something to be fearful of so long as you dont get youreself tangled up with a 'kneel bitch or ill beat you' type.

the guys that have got my submission are the ones that have instilled trust and faith in their decision making, my enslavement to them was not dragged from me, i gave it, willingly because i felt safe to do so.  beyond that relationships work or they dont work, but the premis was right, the emotions were right and im still in touch with the ones that meant the most to me.

all im trying to say, convolutedly is that you shouldnt be scared off by titles - only the ones who think that a title gives them the right to behave like asshats - but youre too smart for them anyway.



I use the term dominant as a self identifier and to let others know my basic approach but as for titles it has always been my practice to wait till she decides what I am and bestows the title that she wants, on me


If it's from her and heartfelt there is little doubt she means it.

Though once she has given me a title I'm not reluctant to be sure she doesn't forget to use it when it's appropriate.





_____________________________

all around nice guy and creative misogynist

i'm not very skilled so i just hit harder

i want a woman to make into the woman she never wanted to become

(in reply to lally2)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Why M/s? - 3/23/2010 7:21:11 AM   
Nslavu


Posts: 342
Joined: 2/1/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heartfeltsub

Because i am in the process of highjacking my own thread, i would like to start another one to ask an additional question from both the M side and the s side. Why do you want an M/s relationship? What is it about that type of relationship dynamic that feeds you?

heartfelt



I think knowing your D/s M/s natural needs upfront, is one more way to select not only what, but who works best with you before you get into a relationship. The more things you know about yourself and use to remove elements of chance the better your opportunity is for success. D/s M/s, removes that nagging power issue that plagues 'normal' relationships.

It works better, when the s-type does the selecting as well, which is another thing that is backassward in 'normal' world relationships.


(in reply to heartfeltsub)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Why M/s? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109