agnes26
Posts: 6
Joined: 3/22/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: barelynangel quote:
Leptospirosis - a disease which could potentially kill me. I didn't have insurance at the time, as the place didn't offer it. The doctor told the other employees to see their doctor and get pre-emptive meds, which they all did, as they had husbands with insurance. On an aside -- This makes no sense to me. You should have seen a lawyer or at the very least filed a worker's comp claim. If your employer stated in the handbook you MUST do this and pay for it on your own to work there and you didn't -- the vet should have fired you. However, if the employer didn't specifically state this is a MUST to work there -- you should be able to receive worker's compensation for as long as you have the disease. Unless its a requirement to work there, the company is responsible for any injury you receive while working. Just because you did not get the preemptive treatment, he is still liable for your contracting same if he allowed you to work there knowing you didn't have the preemptive treatment. However, i would believe you would have had an obligation to inform your employer you were unable to get the preemptive treatment due to lack of insurance. If you didn't, then there may be comparative fault. But it doesn't sound like it was a requirement as he should have requested proof. Anyway, sorry for the sidetrack, i saw this and it doesn't make sense with worker comp laws etc. I woud still if you have the disease check with a worker comp lawyer to see if you can salvage any part of a claim due to your contracting same at work. angel Well I didn't come down with Lepto and to be honest, it never occured to me at the time to hold the vet responsible for paying for pre-emptive treatment. I doubt he would have, as he said pretty much "Eh - the chances are small, you'll be fine, but you should see your doctor anyway."
|