ThatDamnedPanda
Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen It is not so much that their culture is more primitive than ours but that it is different. To hold that it is more primitive is to invite comparisons that may not show us in the best of lights, let alone as a perfect guide to social and cultural betterment or to an optimal system of laws and justice, on other counts.... I can't agree with that. Any culture that beheads people for practicing witchcraft is, by definition, primitive. If you want to argue that Western culture is primitive in many ways as well, that's a valid point - but a separate argument. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen Should it be a crime to practise magic? No. Even so, should it be a capital offence? Absolutely not. Should the defendant be at any risk of prosecution for failing to believe as he is told? Of course not. But I only think that because of the cultural background of time and place I live in - were I in the same place a few centuries back I might have answered quite to the contrary. But that's the point - we're not living a few centuries back. We're living right now. Despite our many faults, Western culture has at least moved past the days of the Spanish Inquisition. Saudi culture has not, and that makes them a primitive society. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyEllen So all in all I think most people here are correct to criticise and attack Saudi Arabia over this matter, but I also think Sanity is correct (major heart attack) that we have to engage with these people if we wish to see change towards the values we espouse through effecting changes to culture - although in that I would also say that we ought not be afraid of effects on our values and culture where we could learn a thing or two from the other side. The key is exactly this, to encourage them to change their ideas according to what we can give them which is of advantage to them and that they perceive to be of advantage to them, reciprocating that openness according to what we find useful of theirs. Which all sounds good, but if the net effect of this engagement is that after 70 years of mutual observation the Saudis are still beheading people for sorcery and cutting people's hands off for drinking, how much change have we encouraged? I'd argue very little. In fact, I'd argue that this policy of benign engagement has served more to enable the Saudi royal family to stay rooted in the extremist, primitive ways of the past by protecting them and insulating them from the forces of real change.
_____________________________
Panda, panda, burning bright In the forest of the night What immortal hand or eye Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?
|