Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/17/2010 4:16:35 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
I cant come to the phone right now.

I am checking to see if it is legal to ask.-----------------------------

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 121
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/17/2010 4:37:44 PM   
TheHeretic


Posts: 19100
Joined: 3/25/2007
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

I am checking to see if it is legal to ask.-----------------------------



No worries, Pahunk. You and those websites and radio shows you put way too much faith in are fine, here.



_____________________________

If you lose one sense, your other senses are enhanced.
That's why people with no sense of humor have such an inflated sense of self-importance.


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 122
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/17/2010 5:33:49 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Am I wrong?

I thought the Monarch had German blood in them.



Anglo-Saxons....... get a clue and get a grip.

Termy, I see my point still zoomed straight over your head like a V2 rocket. Germany brought in the laws they did, due to a steep rise in right wing violence. This included several deaths. The idea of the law is to stop the neo-nazis from inciting violence. You see it as stopping free speech, most over here see it as stopping racial and religious persecution.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 123
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/17/2010 6:11:51 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
The 1990 Echo of Weimar 1923 Germany’s fate during the crucial strategic development of 1923, was a product of that history to which I have referred, summarily, above. It was a history whose principal developments date from the 1890 expulsion of Chancellor Bismarck through the influence exerted by the Prince of Wales Albert Edward. This was not a mere matter of personalities; it has been an outgrowth of what has been expressed in the subsumed role of personalities. The actions taken against Germany, jointly, by Britain’s Margaret Thatcher, France’s President François Mitterrand, and U.S. President George H.W. Bush, had been virtually copies of that collective decision of the Versailles victors which had been used by, principally, the same British interests, and their Wall Street accomplices, which had brought Adolf Hitler to power in Germany at the close of January 1933. That is a bitter lesson to be considered from past history, for today. How shall we now escape the presently onrushing repetition of old follies which had gripped our United States, once more, in these, our present, recent times?/snip
http://www.larouchepac.com/node/13731

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 124
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 12:01:23 AM   
cadenas


Posts: 517
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
German courts claim jurisdiction over holocaust denial regardless of citizenship or where it was said. They base that on the claim that in today's age of mass media, even something published in Australia could conceivably be read by a German. Two years ago, they asked Britain to arrest and extradite an Australian on the way from the USA to Dubai, for things he published in Australia (Britain refused).

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

According to what I understand T, the idiot gave an interview to the Swedish TV channel in Regensburg, Germany. It was then broadcast in Sweden but the nature of the comments attracted attention to him. The court had jurisdiction as it would appear, because he said what he said in Germany.

E

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 125
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 1:15:36 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
"German courts claim jurisdiction over holocaust denial regardless of citizenship or where it was said. They base that on the claim that in today's age of mass media, even something published in Australia could conceivably be read by a German. Two years ago, they asked Britain to arrest and extradite an Australian on the way from the USA to Dubai, for things he published in Australia "

And that's just fine right ? Where do I have to go to get punished. (don't fucking start now, I didn't mean that)

And I doubt the German government is even German with that attitude. Who they are is anyone's guess, but I don't think they are Arabs.

Can someone tell me of another race, YES RACE who enjoys the benefit of laws against criticising them (worldwide apparently). I won't even say the fucking word, you already know. And half of you think it's just fine. You think it's OK that the "German" government can subpoena CM and get my IPs and trace me back to me home in Ohio and come in the middle of the night and whisk me off to Germany for a mock trial where any lawyer who defends me is also in danger of pers, oops prosecution. Don't forget the law is always fair and just. And this is not so bad, the "Germans" just want to police the whole world just like we do. Our government works tirelessly to this end, of course with unanimous popular support. I deserve to be executed on sight.

T

(in reply to cadenas)
Profile   Post #: 126
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 3:23:01 AM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
basically yeah term. whiny neo nazis should be shot on sight.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 127
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 3:31:39 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
We are the new Germany.  We even took their space program   Op paperclip. 

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 128
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 6:11:09 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

And I doubt the German government is even German with that attitude. Who they are is anyone's guess, but I don't think they are Arabs.

Can someone tell me of another race, YES RACE who enjoys the benefit of laws against criticising them (worldwide apparently). I won't even say the fucking word, you already know.



Shalom. Even pigs like you need peace.

_____________________________



(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 129
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 6:16:08 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
OK, name one other specifically protected "group" then.

T

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 130
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 6:44:23 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cadenas

German courts claim jurisdiction over holocaust denial regardless of citizenship or where it was said. They base that on the claim that in today's age of mass media, even something published in Australia could conceivably be read by a German. Two years ago, they asked Britain to arrest and extradite an Australian on the way from the USA to Dubai, for things he published in Australia (Britain refused).

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

According to what I understand T, the idiot gave an interview to the Swedish TV channel in Regensburg, Germany. It was then broadcast in Sweden but the nature of the comments attracted attention to him. The court had jurisdiction as it would appear, because he said what he said in Germany.

E



I find that difficult to understand. It appears to make no sense - otherwise I should be extradited for things I have said here and elsewhere in public fora, including on this thread perhaps, that may be interpreted as "holocaust denial". Indeed if it were the case then we must account for the continued liberty of thousands of Brits who, as long time members of far right political movements, have committed an offence and continue to do so in this regard, not to mention many more thousands across many other European countries who have done and continue to do likewise.

There is EU competence to arrest, indict and try in the EU for war crimes anywhere in the world, but it cannot be that one state (ie Germany) may try citizens of other countries for words or deeds that were not an offence in the jurisdiction they were said or performed in; this would make a nonsense of jurisdiction.

There have been apparent exceptions; the notorious case of the autistic Brit who hacked the Pentagon computer systems for instance - but in that case the crime may be readily deemed to have been committed in the US for that is where the actus reus occurred even if the mens rea occurred in the UK.

The reason the judge in the bishop's case reduced the fine was that she accepted that the bishop did not intend for his comments to be broadcast in Germany (though he perhaps ought to have realised they might be), but she should not have tried the case at all according to competent jurisdiction, if the comments had not been made within German jurisdiction.

Do you have any links to support your assertion? I speak German so its not a problem if they are in German.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to cadenas)
Profile   Post #: 131
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 11:30:23 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

OK, name one other specifically protected "group" then.

T


I thought you knew all about Germanys laws Termy ?  Far from protecting any one group they specifically protect groups based on race, ethnicity, and gender. Your assertion that they only protect Jewish people comes across as racist.

The German constitution, and lets get it right, you are on about protecting the constitution, states peoples human dignity is constitutionally protected. Nothing wrong with that is there ?

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 132
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 11:52:25 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rfd1

Stolz was defending Zundel in court when she was arrested in the courtroom for Holocaust Denial as she addressed the court on behalf of her client.



This really does sound a dreadful outcome - a lawyer being arrested for her defence of a client in a serious case wherein she might of course have had to refer to the charges and their nature, but then its usually the case with certain people that we get less than half a story, framed in such a way that any reasonable person might reach the desired conclusion.

The actual reasons Stolz was disbarred and sent to prison were very simple - she totally breached the professional privilege she should enjoy as part and parcel of her duties as a defence lawyer, and quite knowingly and intentionally (rather than recklessly), broke the law herself, not simply by referencing her client's comments but knowingly and intentionally innovating upon them in a blatant display of her well documented national socialist sympathies.

Oh yes dear reader, it was no accident or cab rank principle that put her defending Zundl - she was and had been up to her neck in the denial of genocide and rehabilitation of naziism for years. What she did in the courtroom was no horrific abuse of civil rights but a stage managed display designed to attract attention and sympathy for her cause.

The sentence, and the professional sanction against her, are truly merciful in my view.

E

_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to rfd1)
Profile   Post #: 133
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 1:11:17 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

quote:

ORIGINAL: rfd1

Stolz was defending Zundel in court when she was arrested in the courtroom for Holocaust Denial as she addressed the court on behalf of her client.



This really does sound a dreadful outcome - a lawyer being arrested for her defence of a client in a serious case wherein she might of course have had to refer to the charges and their nature, but then its usually the case with certain people that we get less than half a story, framed in such a way that any reasonable person might reach the desired conclusion.

The actual reasons Stolz was disbarred and sent to prison were very simple - she totally breached the professional privilege she should enjoy as part and parcel of her duties as a defence lawyer, and quite knowingly and intentionally (rather than recklessly), broke the law herself, not simply by referencing her client's comments but knowingly and intentionally innovating upon them in a blatant display of her well documented national socialist sympathies.

Oh yes dear reader, it was no accident or cab rank principle that put her defending Zundl - she was and had been up to her neck in the denial of genocide and rehabilitation of naziism for years. What she did in the courtroom was no horrific abuse of civil rights but a stage managed display designed to attract attention and sympathy for her cause.

The sentence, and the professional sanction against her, are truly merciful in my view.

E


thats what a court is is a stage.

genocide has never been evidenced, in fact the us army criminal medical corp said there was no genocide.

but lets just slaughter the truth



< Message edited by Real0ne -- 4/18/2010 1:12:31 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 134
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 1:13:56 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
He who says nothing is complicate in this bloody slaughter of the Arabs.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 135
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 1:25:07 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Your assertion that they only protect Jewish people comes across as racist.




That's what he is. Termyn8or is a self-confessed racist and antisemite. It's all in the archives .

_____________________________



(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 136
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 1:28:41 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Your assertion that they only protect Jewish people comes across as racist.




That's what he is. Termyn8or is a self-confessed racist and antisemite. It's all in the archives .



Surely a step up from tin foil hatters.   lol

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 137
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 1:30:33 PM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Oh yeah, antisemitism: such a lovely way to be .

_____________________________



(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 138
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 1:31:21 PM   
kiwisub12


Posts: 4742
Joined: 1/11/2006
Status: offline
As far as i can tell, this entire thread is a couple of loons , with delusions of historical accuracy arguing against apparently normal indivuduals - who should know better!
You can't MAKE someone believe if they don't want to.
Especially if they have a vested interest in not believing.
All arguing does is give importance to what they are blethering about.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 139
RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial - 4/18/2010 1:31:34 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Oh yeah, antisemitism: such a lovely way to be .


So pumpkin.  Has your kin killed any Arabs today in Iraq?

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 140
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: German court fines British bishop for Holocaust denial Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094