RE: The dangers of mind control. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


Jeffff -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 2:29:33 PM)

Mine... then yours... then mine....


Anyway....

Plas. If you really are concerned then I would recommend you not become involved with someone until you are sure of your own motivations.

You are gonna fuck up, everyone does. The best you can hope for is to not repeat the same mistake over and over.





fitzroy10 -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 2:49:09 PM)

If I understand your question you want know how to handle your talents---which makes me wonder why you can't control your own mind. as well as those of your victims.  The "krpytonite" reference is not too far out of line because in the original Superman comic the young superhero pledged to always use his power for the good of all..




gungadin09 -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 2:56:58 PM)

i appreciate Your earnestness, but if You can get into their mind that easily, is it still fun? Wouldn't it be more satisfying to dominate someone who isn't a complete pushover? i've met people before who had really good social skills and were able to influence people very easily. They got their way a lot, which was probably nice for them, but i don't think it's the basis for a relationship. On the other hand, a little reality check might be a good thing for some people. There are people (like me...) who never learn to think critically until they've gotten screwed enough.

You seem to have a concience, or You wouldn't be asking these questions. i guess the question would be if You're likely to do any long term harm by manipulating the person. If so, then the ethical choice would be to stop.

pam




gungadin09 -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 3:26:11 PM)

i hate seeing people ganged up on. i don't care if He is full of shit. "Mind Control" may have been the wrong words to use, but i believe that every poster deserves to have their ideas taken seriously, and to be answered in an adult way instead of being personally attacked. Just my opinion, i know, but i hate it when these threads deteriorate into name calling and petty bickering.

pam




laurell3 -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 3:28:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: gungadin09

i hate seeing people ganged up on. i don't care if He is full of shit. "Mind Control" may have been the wrong words to use, but i believe that every poster deserves to have their ideas taken seriously, and to be answered in an adult way instead of being personally attacked. Just my opinion, i know, but i hate it when these threads deteriorate into name calling and petty bickering.

pam


Hate it all you want. There are no victims here. If one comes into a social setting strutting and insulting, they are going to get it back. It really is that simple.




gungadin09 -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 3:30:47 PM)

i know... But i still hate it.

pam




porcelaine -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 3:38:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

That sounds more like a bdsm-ism than my actual fact. One doesn't "easily dismiss" people who are highly influential and charismatic. Nor do I need any particular "internal pull". I'm struggling to figure out if what I'm talking about and what plasticine is talking about are the same thing or not... but to hear him tell the story, it sounds about like the questions I struggled with at the age of 25. If he's talking about the same things that I am, then consent is not required, nor is willingness or any particular internal pull. As you correctly said, In fact, the most adept are pulling your strings without your knowledge. Consciously of course. although again, I might quibble with the "pulling your strings" metaphor.

I think at this point though, I'm bailing out of this thread. I just can't see how honest discussions of this topic are not going to be horribly misconstrued by this audience.


We'll continue this elsewhere. I'm not referencing it from that perspective at all. But the cold hard reality of the subject we're discussing. And I worded the last bit that way intentionally. See you on the flip side for our chit chat. :)

~porcelaine




porcelaine -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 3:47:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Plasticine

You cannot "hypnotise" the unwilling, there is no question.  This stuff doesn't work on me either.  This isn't a contest though.  I am relating my own experiences.  Not asking whether some random person who has never met me thinks they would submit.  That's not very useful information really. Thank You.


Willingness has nothing to do with your inability to do what you're claiming. Quackery comes in all shades and a few keystrokes does not a mastermind make. I do find it interesting that you're projecting your need for validation on the unsuspecting. But whatever tickles your funny bone I suppose. In terms of the usefulness of my comments, you asked and I shared. Unlike the great pretender some of us actually do the things that you propose.

~porcelaine




Malkinius -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 3:56:04 PM)

{fast reply}

Greetings all....

I do have to step into this one. It hits solidly on what I have been researching. First of all, yes, conditioning and brainwashing can be done. Jeff....your sources are 20 years out of date. A lot has been learned since then. No, it is not everything going on here with what the OP says he can do. Yes, what he claims is within the limits of what I see as possible given a rather unusual set of combined abilities. It could also be someone trying to subtly advertise themselves to subs looking to be controlled through hypnosis or other mind control activities.

Neurolinguistic programming and other similar concepts work mostly on the semiotic and psychological levels of communication. When combined knowingly with a good does of empathy and the understanding of how people behave and interact with each other plus human motivations you can do some very interesting and amazing things. No, it is not hypnosis and yes, it is getting past the conscious mind and working directly with the subconscious. Yes, this can be taught and learned. There is also a neurobiological component to long term mental changes. I can tell you the neurobiological mechanism by which this occurs and good luck in trying to make it happen.

We we talk about submission and enslavement we are talking about changing someone's way of thinking. That comes down to brainwashing in the crudest form. It is done through both mental and physical activities and works best in a consensual situation. Self hypnosis can also be a factor in consensual submission even if it is not recognized as such as it is occurring.

I will grant that the old ideas about subliminal advertising did not really work very well, if at all. However, meme repetition and prioritization does work, it just takes a while. What it comes down to is that given enough time and the correctly targeted appropriate stimuli you can be changed with or without your consent. It is just so much easier with consent. Yes, some people are changed easier than others and depending on the person, it is easier to change them in certain directions than others.

Be well all.....

Malkinius




Plasticine -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 4:05:10 PM)

This is not quackery.  There is absolutely science to dominance.  You can watch it in lions and gorillas.  We are not that different from them.

I know my brand of darkness isn't for everyone.  Any sub who wants to have anything to do with me should absolutely read this in its proper context.

But my version of how all this works is the closest version to the predators' that anyone will ever admit to.  I am a pathological manipulator, but I have strong morals and empathy, and I'll tell you to your face exactly who and what I am.  I will even stop and go back and review a manipulation with the sub to show them exactly how I got them where I did.  No tricks up my sleeve, they are all right here on the table.






DesFIP -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 4:06:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Plasticine


Good.  Thank You.

Yes your assumption is correct, and a worthwhile addition.  When I project the highly suggestible are strongly affected.

That's their problem to learn healthy boundaries, not yours. It's your problem to be an ethical and moral human being who can face himself in the morning by not doing things you would be ashamed of. If you can't not do those things, then you're a sociopath and I recommend therapy to deal with childhood abuse.

I'm not talking about pushing anyone's physical or sexual limits.  I am wondering about their emotional limits.  I am in no way talking about Domination in a fetish sense.

EDIT: If you need a more clear example, examine my language-ing in this very thread.

Your language is not a concrete example. A concrete example would be you saying what you said or did to someone and what their response was. You're talking in such generalizations that we have to guess at what you mean. Don't do that, it's rude.





Plasticine -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 4:09:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Malkinius

{fast reply}

Greetings all....

I do have to step into this one. It hits solidly on what I have been researching. First of all, yes, conditioning and brainwashing can be done. Jeff....your sources are 20 years out of date. A lot has been learned since then. No, it is not everything going on here with what the OP says he can do. Yes, what he claims is within the limits of what I see as possible given a rather unusual set of combined abilities. It could also be someone trying to subtly advertise themselves to subs looking to be controlled through hypnosis or other mind control activities.

Neurolinguistic programming and other similar concepts work mostly on the semiotic and psychological levels of communication. When combined knowingly with a good does of empathy and the understanding of how people behave and interact with each other plus human motivations you can do some very interesting and amazing things. No, it is not hypnosis and yes, it is getting past the conscious mind and working directly with the subconscious. Yes, this can be taught and learned. There is also a neurobiological component to long term mental changes. I can tell you the neurobiological mechanism by which this occurs and good luck in trying to make it happen.

We we talk about submission and enslavement we are talking about changing someone's way of thinking. That comes down to brainwashing in the crudest form. It is done through both mental and physical activities and works best in a consensual situation. Self hypnosis can also be a factor in consensual submission even if it is not recognized as such as it is occurring.

I will grant that the old ideas about subliminal advertising did not really work very well, if at all. However, meme repetition and prioritization does work, it just takes a while. What it comes down to is that given enough time and the correctly targeted appropriate stimuli you can be changed with or without your consent. It is just so much easier with consent. Yes, some people are changed easier than others and depending on the person, it is easier to change them in certain directions than others.

Be well all.....

Malkinius



And in comes science!  Thank you so much. This thread is a catastrophe of an advertisement though. :P




Plasticine -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 4:15:40 PM)

quote:

Your language is not a concrete example. A concrete example would be you saying what you said or did to someone and what their response was. You're talking in such generalizations that we have to guess at what you mean. Don't do that, it's rude.


You are right and I apologize.  But I'm afraid that to illustrate any more clearly would be to start to write a guidebook.  Even a few sentences on what I specifically am doing could give the wrong person some very bad ideas.  I spent years studying things out of curiosity and they came together into this.  I could write that book, but to do so would be wrong.




DesFIP -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 4:24:37 PM)

BS

You're talking about getting someone to submit to you in casual conversation. What did you have her/him do? Wherein comes the emotional harm in what she/he said?

My opinion of you has gone down from someone who can't express himself clearly to someone who is pretending to be the Wizard when he's really just the fraud behind the curtain. And if your ability to talk clearly and communicate well is as poor as it appears here, I'm not sure how you can get a coffee and danish in the morning.




Plasticine -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 4:34:09 PM)

quote:

You're talking about getting someone to submit to you in casual conversation. What did you have her/him do? Wherein comes the emotional harm in what she/he said?


I understand that you don't believe me.  But let's just say I can do that.  Should I share that information on a forum that is already probably rife with people trolling for the vulnerable?  Do you really think that would be wise?




DarkSteven -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 4:43:26 PM)

OP, look.  The only distinction between the relationship you've just described, and that of any other D/s relationship, is the degree of control you're claiming over the sub.  So, ignoring that part, your question then becomes - "I have control over a submissive.  How do I deal with that?"

The answer is, to always keep her well-being in mind.  Your satisfaction is a big factor, but so is her safety.

With that in mind, have fun and enjoy her!




littlewonder -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 4:45:50 PM)

Have you ever thought about getting a therapist for possible diagnosis of narcissism?




Missokyst -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 4:49:03 PM)

Umm.... I dont think it is the mind you are controlling. DAMN baby, you are hot! I almost felt the urge to go belly up just on the picture.




BentUnit -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 4:57:51 PM)

Dearest OP,

I do hope for your sake you don't suffer from vertigo or altitude sickness because that's an awfully tall pedestal you've built for your self.
The only danger you hold for anyone is making them laugh until they throw up.

Missokyst,
Perhaps running the profile picture through Tin-eye might help you to find where the picture was lifted from. [;)]




laurell3 -> RE: The dangers of mind control. (6/12/2010 5:18:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Missokyst

Umm.... I dont think it is the mind you are controlling. DAMN baby, you are hot! I almost felt the urge to go belly up just on the picture.



You're assuming that picture is real. Consider the source. Anyone with half a brain can manipulate, the challenge is getting that same result without it.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125