caitlyn
Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: UtopianRanger I'll cut ya some huss, but I do find this part of your post to be at least a tad bit disingenuous. You chastise the middle class here for their desire to purchase/drive 80k German cars, yet two months ago you make a post in which you elaborate on wanting to purchase/own a Hummer H2 with all the bells and whistles. Please show me a better, more representative example of gluttony than someone who owns, wants to own, or drives a super gas-guzzling, inefficient vehicle like a Hummer! Well, obviously I was mostly kidding about a Hummer. With my commute, the gas would eat me alive. The two examples I used, were a car made in Germany and a television made in Japan. That I mentioned the countries, should be considered intentional. It's a misread to think that I expect all Americans to be on a sort of austerity program. That is just not realistic. People that work hard and make a good living, will want to buy nice things. I see nothing wrong with that ... but can't Americans buy things made in America, by American workers? When I was closing in on my High School graduation, my foster parents told me they were going to get me a new car. At the time I was going to be attending college in California, and they wanted me to have a good ride (my old car was a serious beater). I asked for a Hummer, knowing I would never get one, and as a fallback asked for something like a Mustang, an F-150, or a Jeep Wrangler. Well I ended up deciding to stay at home for school, which thrilled my foster parents to no end, and when graduation came, as a reward I got a very nice, brand new BMW. It's bad ass to be sure ... probably far more than I'm worth as a daughter ... and it's made in Germany. Now, I have nothing against Germany or German cars. I think every single person in Germany should own one!!! So, to me ... a Hummer is a much better choice for an American, than a BMW, or even a Honda Civic. I do have one question though, and it seems to be the one that all the pro-service people are avoiding. How will we pay for it? Two years of service would add eleven million people to the government payroll. That's eleven million more paychecks for the goverment to cut, every year. Some have given answers like "other countries do it", but that isn't really an answer. Those examples are small countries, and the numbers are not so frightening. So, since you are for it, get out your calculator, multiply 30K (wages, upkeep, training, logistics, etc ...) by eleven million (330 billion dollars, by the way), and tell us what programs you would cut that would raise that kind of money? Lets go on the cheap, and not pay these people at all ... just provide upkeep, training, logistics, etc ... We should be able to get away with 10K a year per person for that. That's only 110 billing dollars a year. What a great deal!!!! Please let us know what programs you are going to cut, that will equal that kind of money? Unless of course, you're for higher taxation to raise it. P.S. This is all in good fun. I have always enjoyed your posts. Please don't take my assertive debate style, as harshness.
|