LadyPact -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 9:46:38 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady FR- I tend to look at both the same way, but that "view" can vary. It seems that often around here, there are a few who claim to be "pros" at 18, 19 or so, give or take a couple years. To me, it is unlikely that they have had the life experience to become "pro" at such a young age and tend to fall into the category that AQSM described, essentially money whores without a clue looking for an easy way to get some guy to pay the bills. Then there are those who are older and more experienced and it is a job. Again, as AQSM described, like the difference between a street hooker and a high priced call girl. Then of course there are those who don't claim to be "pros" but are all about the guy giving "tribute." You'll get absolutely no argument from Me on any of the above. quote:
For the men, variables apply as well. I'm sure a large number of men who are using pros of any kind do so because they are married and seeking to satisfy a need outside their marriage. If they are doing this secretly, I don't approve and think they are scum, plain and simple. Not interested in their reasoning for going behind their wife's back, doesn't matter. They are cheating. Granted, because they aren't doing it to me, it is in that whole "your kink, not mine" kind of thing, but I personally wouldn't want anything to do with them. I understand a respectable pro taking them on as a client, after all, for them it is a job, not a relationship. I believe we see eye to eye on this as well. I'm pretty vocal on the cheating issue. quote:
On the other hand, if a married man uses a pro to have his needs met and his wife has consented, I see nothing wrong with it, in fact, I think for many this is better for their primary relationship than if they got "involved" with someone else in a secondary relationship. I mean no offense to the great number of people here who DO have these secondary relationships and all the spouses are involved. That works great for them and that's fine as well. I just think it would be easier to simply have their submissive needs met outside the marriage without the ongoing demands of a Mistress. I'm not offended at all, but I would like to address it. I think you have to look at the situation from both viewpoints. If someone is married and looking for play only, you might be right. The best option might be to pay for that aspect alone. However, as has been pointed out many times in this thread and others, this makes it a business transaction. That person isn't especially fulfilling his submissive desires. Rather, he is bottoming. It is not especially D/s nor is it necessarily in service. There isn't a power structured dynamic that some folks crave. Going to a pro gets the bottoming wants met, but the actual submission? Most likely not. quote:
I can see single men using reputable pros because they have the needs but aren't looking for a full time relationship of that type for whatever reason, or they are looking for the right relationship but in the meantime find it easier to have their needs met by a pro. I tend to call them wants, but I agree with the concept. quote:
I guess my views on it all comes down to the honesty of the people involved. Dishonesty on either side puts either one on the same low level. Very true and I'm glad that a person's honesty and ethics come into play in the conversation from both sides of it.
|
|
|
|