RE: Why Just Pros? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


chicagosub4u -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 8:35:49 AM)

I think being a pro domme sounds great. I get to set my own schedule, hand select my clients and get my frustration out to boot.

A recent thread spoke of a man who had a relationship with a pro domme that was strctly online. She had to do nothing but provide him assignments and deadlines. He accomplished the tasks and met the deadlines. Having a few virtual slaves and a few real time ones would allow me to accomplish much more in any given day. Plus, I would never have to pick up my dry cleaning again.




divi -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 8:38:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: chicagosub4u

I think being a pro domme sounds great. I get to set my own schedule, hand select my clients and get my frustration out to boot.

A recent thread spoke of a man who had a relationship with a pro domme that was strctly online. She had to do nothing but provide him assignments and deadlines. He accomplished the tasks and met the deadlines. Having a few virtual slaves and a few real time ones would allow me to accomplish much more in any given day. Plus, I would never have to pick up my dry cleaning again.

OMG my thoughts exactly! I would have the best lawn on the block. I would always be caught up with laundry and have dinner on the table on time.




chicagosub4u -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 8:49:52 AM)

AND, the house would be immaulate!! My hardwood floors will be like mirrors. Plus when you have a party there would alway be someone to make drinks and pass appetizers so you can actually enjoy the party.

I would also want my closet to be organized (there will be hell to pay if it is out of order) shirts, slacks and suites will be placed based on color and type. Shoes will be organized by color and type (now this is a project).




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 8:55:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: chicagosub4u

I think being a pro domme sounds great. I get to set my own schedule, hand select my clients and get my frustration out to boot.

A recent thread spoke of a man who had a relationship with a pro domme that was strctly online. She had to do nothing but provide him assignments and deadlines. He accomplished the tasks and met the deadlines. Having a few virtual slaves and a few real time ones would allow me to accomplish much more in any given day. Plus, I would never have to pick up my dry cleaning again.



I am guessing that you are being facetious, but truly, this bit of silly thinking is what drives so many of those 20 yr old "Pros" that have ads on the other side.

It's a difficult, interesting, and marginally profitable business, if you run it in such a way that you won't get utterly burned out. I've never done phone work, it sounds tempting the way Chrissy describes it, but good phone work takes lots of energy too.

The men that were my clients came from a range of backgrounds. My partners and I were very selective about who we saw, and those skanky no social skills types were not on the list. I'm happy to say that I got many clients out into the real life scene, and away from having to pay for part time entertainment. I would not disrespect myself by seeing someone that I wouldn't associate with away from the business setting.

And for those of you who are playing the "not real domination" harp, yeah whatever. Pro domination is the business of fantasy fulfillment. How many "real submissives" do you think I saw?




Jeffff -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 9:00:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus


And for those of you who are playing the "not real domination" harp, yeah whatever. Pro domination is the business of fantasy fulfillment. How many "real submissives" do you think I saw?


Almost none?

That's kinda my point.





LadyNTrainer -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 9:05:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy
Pro dommes and prostitutes are not doctors, plumbers or building contractors.


Actually, some of them are.  I'm not the only pro who moonlights.  There are pro dommes who can be addressed as Doctor, and I mean in a vanilla professional/academic context, not in a kinky medical scene.


quote:

Others say they have some sort of respect for hookers and prostitutes. I have none. Zero. Zilch.


That would, alas, say more about you than about sex workers as a group. 


Lets reward someone because they were lucky enough to be born with some holes some sort of a genetic predisposition towards attraction that people find to be palatable.

Let's applaud the dumbfucks, let's praise those who have done nothing to better themselves. Let's cheer on those that sell their holes.

If you truly believe that what a professional dominant does is to simply give men access to her holes, and that she has no skills, it is clearly time for the good folks of CM to take up a collection for the Send Domiguy To A Pro Dom Fund.   It is my fond hope that the results should look like this.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuCweSnSQ6w&feature=related 

So who's in?  [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]

Srsly.  If you have no skills, you have no f'n business taking a submissive's health and safety in your hands, certainly not professionally. Though there do seem to be plenty of folks in every industry who care more about taking clients for all they can get than about ethically meeting a good standard of qualification to practice in their field.  You can find some very unprofessional professionals in the adult industry specifically because we do not have certifying organizations or boards of ethics, so the situation is definitely caveat emptor in the unregulated market. 




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 9:08:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus


And for those of you who are playing the "not real domination" harp, yeah whatever. Pro domination is the business of fantasy fulfillment. How many "real submissives" do you think I saw?


Almost none?

That's kinda my point.





I guess I'm missing it, then... pro domination is almost all role play and gaming. Except for the perhaps 10% who became friends, they gave me monies, I gave them a great time. Everybody happy. Was someone arguing otherwise? Maybe I was just ignoring them!




PeanutTigerinBox -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 9:20:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

I am guessing that you are being facetious, but truly, this bit of silly thinking is what drives so many of those 20 yr old "Pros" that have ads on the other side.

It's a difficult, interesting, and marginally profitable business, if you run it in such a way that you won't get utterly burned out. I've never done phone work, it sounds tempting the way Chrissy describes it, but good phone work takes lots of energy too.

And for those of you who are playing the "not real domination" harp, yeah whatever. Pro domination is the business of fantasy fulfillment. How many "real submissives" do you think I saw?


Very well said...not to forget the "lovely people" who call you and try to get phonesex out of you pretty much free of charge (apart from normal phone costs) with just trying to keep you engaged that way via phone...where I made sure he either gets straight to the point or the conversation is finished, because if he wants phonesex, he can call the people who offer it and pay a tad bit more for that service!!!

and yep...weren't that many "twue dominants" I met in that time either...only 2 out of I dont know how many...I can recall....




PeanutTigerinBox -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 9:33:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy
Pro dommes and prostitutes are not doctors, plumbers or building contractors.


Actually, some of them are.  I'm not the only pro who moonlights.  There are pro dommes who can be addressed as Doctor, and I mean in a vanilla professional/academic context, not in a kinky medical scene.


quote:

Others say they have some sort of respect for hookers and prostitutes. I have none. Zero. Zilch.


That would, alas, say more about you than about sex workers as a group. 


quote:

Lets reward someone because they were lucky enough to be born with some holes some sort of a genetic predisposition towards attraction that people find to be palatable.

Let's applaud the dumbfucks, let's praise those who have done nothing to better themselves. Let's cheer on those that sell their holes.


If you truly believe that what a professional dominant does is to simply give men access to her holes, and that she has no skills, it is clearly time for the good folks of CM to take up a collection for the Send Domiguy To A Pro Dom Fund.   It is my fond hope that the results should look like this.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuCweSnSQ6w&feature=related 

So who's in?  [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]

Srsly.  If you have no skills, you have no f'n business taking a submissive's health and safety in your hands, certainly not professionally. Though there do seem to be plenty of folks in every industry who care more about taking clients for all they can get than about ethically meeting a good standard of qualification to practice in their field.  You can find some very unprofessional professionals in the adult industry specifically because we do not have certifying organizations or boards of ethics, so the situation is definitely caveat emptor in the unregulated market. 



[sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif]

Domiguys comment sound to me more like disappointment that women have it a lil bit easier to work in that industry then men...and I met a few men who were ticking like that...but his comment about nil respect just makes me laugh, as after all if the "so great men" wouldnt go for them they wouldn't be there in the first place [sm=ofcourse.gif]




LadyPact -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 9:46:38 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady

FR-

I tend to look at both the same way, but that "view" can vary. It seems that often around here, there are a few who claim to be "pros" at 18, 19 or so, give or take a couple years. To me, it is unlikely that they have had the life experience to become "pro" at such a young age and tend to fall into the category that AQSM described, essentially money whores without a clue looking for an easy way to get some guy to pay the bills. Then there are those who are older and more experienced and it is a job. Again, as AQSM described, like the difference between a street hooker and a high priced call girl. Then of course there are those who don't claim to be "pros" but are all about the guy giving "tribute."

You'll get absolutely no argument from Me on any of the above.

quote:

For the men, variables apply as well. I'm sure a large number of men who are using pros of any kind do so because they are married and seeking to satisfy a need outside their marriage. If they are doing this secretly, I don't approve and think they are scum, plain and simple. Not interested in their reasoning for going behind their wife's back, doesn't matter. They are cheating. Granted, because they aren't doing it to me, it is in that whole "your kink, not mine" kind of thing, but I personally wouldn't want anything to do with them. I understand a respectable pro taking them on as a client, after all, for them it is a job, not a relationship.

I believe we see eye to eye on this as well.  I'm pretty vocal on the cheating issue. 

quote:

On the other hand, if a married man uses a pro to have his needs met and his wife has consented, I see nothing wrong with it, in fact, I think for many this is better for their primary relationship than if they got "involved" with someone else in a secondary relationship. I mean no offense to the great number of people here who DO have these secondary relationships and all the spouses are involved. That works great for them and that's fine as well. I just think it would be easier to simply have their submissive needs met outside the marriage without the ongoing demands of a Mistress.

I'm not offended at all, but I would like to address it.

I think you have to look at the situation from both viewpoints.  If someone is married and looking for play only, you might be right.  The best option might be to pay for that aspect alone.

However, as has been pointed out many times in this thread and others, this makes it a business transaction.  That person isn't especially fulfilling his submissive desires.  Rather, he is bottoming.  It is not especially D/s nor is it necessarily in service.  There isn't a power structured dynamic that some folks crave.  Going to a pro gets the bottoming wants met, but the actual submission?  Most likely not.

quote:

I can see single men using reputable pros because they have the needs but aren't looking for a full time relationship of that type for whatever reason, or they are looking for the right relationship but in the meantime find it easier to have their needs met by a pro.

I tend to call them wants, but I agree with the concept.

quote:

I guess my views on it all comes down to the honesty of the people involved. Dishonesty on either side puts either one on the same low level.

Very true and I'm glad that a person's honesty and ethics come into play in the conversation from both sides of it.




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 9:52:07 AM)

Pact what I find fascinating is the opposite occurs in real land- the pros get esteem and tentative respect while the clients get pity. When I tell people my partner still goes to parties and sees pros, I almost always get the weird looks and "But you guys are so happy, why would he want to go see someone else?"

I think it's really that the vast majority of hetero kinksters are in a very small box of what kink fantasy is to be encouraged and it's "male in charge, spank me, force me, tie me, then we go to work."




LadyPact -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 9:55:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level
Good topic, LP.

Neither side should be slammed. If needs are being met on both ends, then good for them.

But, as someone else said, some will take any chance to slam a woman doing this sort of thing, along the same lines as pro-sex work. She's a "whore", while the client is just some poor goofball, or so they seem to see it.

I'm glad you liked it, Level.  [:)]  I also happen to think it's going very well.  I honestly thought it was going to be a huge mess, but I think folks are doing pretty well in engaging with each other regarding their views. 

That last sentence that you use there has a lot of merit.  I think that is how it comes across when reading many of the threads here when the topic comes up.




LadyPact -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 10:09:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

Let's use the McDonalds analogy.  There is a lot of pressure on them to supply healthier foods.  But the fact is that they simply supply what the market wants.  The unhealthy food is brought about because of the buyers, who I consider ultimately responsible.

I see where you are coming from here.  I tend to say the same thing when it comes to the 99,685 threads that are started up by those complaining about scammers.  The scammers wouldn't be here if it didn't pay off.  If there were no prey, there would be no predators.
quote:

Pro Dommes exist because clients have needs and are willing to pay for them (or alternatively, to make posts complaining about how they can't get their fetishes satisfied for free).

It might be familiarity.  I have seen several pro Dommes post here, and I respect them.  I have not seen any sub men post here whom I respect except for a few lifestyle subs like Peon and kal, etc.  Most of the sub men are whiners, just making a single post to complain about something they don't like about the femdom reality, and I may have developed a bias against them as a result.

I can absolutely see why it comes across this way.  In your case, I think you come and visit us down in the Mistress section often enough to get some balance on perspective.  It's hard to see it sometimes because, as much as I hate to say it, there are some out there who go with the submissive label who are nothing but bitter.  I don't know why this is, but I believe there are enough occurrences of it to leave an imprint in thinking.


Edited to correct quoting.




LadyHibiscus -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 10:12:02 AM)

/minor sidetrack/

I keep coming back to Steven's post about how he really doesn't have a lot of time for sub males... and dang, if you think about the few that are the LOUDEST posters (I know I don't need to name names!) they do come off like bitter, whining, carping, nasty pieces of work. The exact kinds of guys that we refused to see as clients!! Hm.

/end sidetrack/




LadyPact -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 10:23:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy
They have virtually no skills whatsoever. They are people that usually through great fault of their own have decided to rely on the lowest common denominator of human capabilities to eek out a living.

Others say they have some sort of respect for hookers and prostitutes. I have none. Zero. Zilch.

Lets reward someone because they were lucky enough to be born with some holes some sort of a genetic predisposition towards attraction that people find to be palatable.

I know it's hard, but let's try to be courteous.  K?

There are folks out there who do have this opinion, and it is valid.  I'm not going to say that I have respect for everyone in a particular profession because there is a small segment that are actually using the profits that they make to better themselves for their future.  There really is a scale out there and not everybody engaging in doing this is feeding their kids or getting their education. 

However, I am very curious to know why you don't consider topping skills...... well...... skills?  Granted, topping skills aren't that hard to learn, but there is a learning process in there, as well as practice.  That goes for pros, lifestyle, female, and male.  I'm just wondering on that one.




LadyPact -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 10:42:03 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy
Basically the common male complaint is the abundance of business advertising on a "personals" website.

So to make this apples to apples --- the sub would have to offer a "lifestyle" Domme money for a scene, and then in theory she might get mad or feel used that she was bought or expected to sell herself.

I'll cop to that.  It pisses Me off when I receive those kinds of emails. 

quote:

Its hard to imagine a vanilla dating site wherein -- say -- a high percentage of the female registrants were advertising escort services.

Lastly your post does not identify what's actually in play. Men aren't mad at professional Dommes, rather they are frustrated by the lack of lifestyle women out there who share their kink. Basically its a bad game of musical chairs, and Pro Domme's are exhibit A that there are only about three seats for every ten (10) men.

I realize you're making a best attempt at taking a stab at the ratio, but I don't see it as quite that lopsided. 

Let's run with the concept of this is a dating site, shall we?  That, to Me, implies potential relationship.  Logically, a person has to look at themselves to see if they are good relationship material and what areas will disqualify them for potential partners.  Age, marital status, poly/monogamy, particular kinks, lifestyle experience, weight, physical appearance, and a slew of other things I could throw out there.  People can complain about it all they want, but it doesn't make it any less true.  If a person wants better odds of finding a partner, why shouldn't they attempt to be good relationship material?

quote:

Think about people in general. They can blame themselves for a bad situation OR they can blame / scapegoat someone else.

So back to your OP, let's blame the subs with fat wallets for the Pro Dommes...... without them -- there would be no professional domination AT ALL! Those fucking rich wankers have TO GO!! RIGHT NOW. GET OFF THE CM WEBSITE AND STAY OFF!

P.S. This is not a very serious post.

It wasn't serious, but it has a point.  Yesterday, there was a thread started about having a special designation for pro dommes.  Oddly enough, nobody seems to think that the clients of those pros should have to be flagged with the equivalent scarlet letter.




LadyPact -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 10:54:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomImus
I think you do a disservice to the very good point you are making by painting it along gender lines. There is a double standard - one standard for the seller and another for the buyer. On one hand I see it as you do -  a business transaction. If A is willing to beat B for a price and B is willing to pay A for said beating and agrees to the price then their business is between the two of them. I strongly dislike telling other people what services they can sell or how to spend their money.

If the disservice is being made, I'm afraid I have to fall back on that it often is drawn in gender lines.  I honestly can't recall that many occasions where a male pro graced these forums and took the same kind of backlash that the female pros do.  This, I think, has to do with the sheer numbers of the profession.  Usually, the males are greeted with the chorus of 'how do I sign up'?

quote:

On the other hand... ever seen that show on HBO called "G String Divas"? A behind the scenes glimpse of the stripper industry. Watching those strippers do their thing on stage for a wad of singles only to watch them go back in the dressing room to count their money and mock and insult their clients was thoroughly disgusting to watch. That whole mentality is why I support their right to their business ventures but still have a pretty dim view of them overall. What a stripper sells and what a pro domme sells are not too terribly different if you think about it.

I actually don't watch that much tv, so thank you for explaining the concept of the show to Me.  With it, I was able to see your point of view and I understand the reasoning on your thoughts behind it.  AQSM brought up the same point in some of his comments.  It does seem rather two-faced from that angle, doesn't it?

quote:

Do it with someone you want to do it with for free. Once you start doing it with someone who you wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole if they weren't paying for it then it puts everything into an entirely different light.

My two cents.

I think it might be interesting at some point to revisit the discussion on casual play.  How many people participate in it or don't and hear views on that.

On a purely personal (in other words hijack) note, I was a bit disappointed that My tight schedule in Georgia last week didn't allow the opportunity to propose a chance of saying hello.  I hope to have the chance to do so one of these days, if you would like.




LadyPact -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 11:02:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

While I am not a vitriolic as my hop-bonded brother. I maintain  Pro "Domme" is a misnomer.

It is business, it is not domination.

To suggest it is more pure than any other business is silly.

In many cases, I honestly agree.  I tend to think that pro top would be a much more accurate term.

I don't expect to win on that one because

a) Some of them don't actually top just the same as some of them don't actually dominate.

b) Anybody new ever looking for the service would have no clue to find providers under a pro top label.

I think we're probably stuck with it.




LadyPact -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 11:11:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
(In reply to allthatjazz)

That's very, very sad.  Speaking of putting oneself in another man's shoes: older generations of men will have had the fantasy of D/s for much of their lives without having more than the slimmest of chances of making it reality.  Until the 1970s, the same was true even of gay men, at least in the UK.  How unbelievably miserable.


While I've never been one to say that the influence of the internet has been good for all aspects of BDSM, this is one area where I will admit that it has been a benefit.  I think that as the years pass there are going to be fewer and fewer later in life folks 'discovering' BDSM for the first time.  There will always be those who's tastes change as they age, but there won't be as many who just plain lacked awareness that all of this exists.




leadership527 -> RE: Why Just Pros? (6/17/2010 11:18:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
So, why aren't the clients held up to the same kind of scrutiny?  Why aren't the same kind of slurs thrown about for those paying for the session as those who are receiving payment?
I think why people like to whine about the whole transaction is pretty obvious. Insofar as why the pro-dommes get the lion's share of the heat, I think it's because they are the one's receiving the money which begets jealousy and greed as well as sets them up to at least appear like they are the one's responsible. As a society, we tend to blame those receiving the money in all areas. For instance, let's blame McDonald's rather than the people who eat there.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875