LafayetteLady
Posts: 7683
Joined: 5/2/2007 From: Northern New Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Elisabella Sorry but you really can't use medical or legal standards as a defense here. Actually those are the standards that are used. quote:
As far as legal standards go - BDSM breaks those standards. There is no such thing as the right to consent to being assaulted. In fact, "BDSM contracts" have been used to prove that the slave partner was brainwashed and incompetent, even writing out explicitly "I consent to this" is proof that you...well...didn't consent. As I mentioned earlier, BDSM within the context of the law is progressing. The cases that are typically tried occur when someone decides they no longer wish to participate, and that desire is ignored, or when a death occurs from some type of play gone wrong. These cases rightfully need to be examined by the courts. Why? Because that is what is allowing progress for changing times. quote:
As far as medical standards - those evolve more quickly. Right now they say anorexia is a disorder. 50 years ago they said homosexuality was a disorder. Did gay people somehow become mentally competent when the DSM changed? I'm guessing that you think it was right to arrest people for sodomy back when both the DSM and the law said sodomy was wrong? This is really an "apples/oranges" kind of comparison, and I would expect more from you Elisabella. The fact of the matter is that homosexuality being "wrong" has always been based on a religious type of perspective, not health reasons. Anorexia however is life threatening. quote:
As far as the girl needing serious help, I agree, believe me I do, I think she's making all the wrong choices here. But there are a lot of people here whose families think they need serious help. Anorexia is outside your comfort zone...lots of people have vanilla mums who would call the cops on their daughter's partner if they found out she was into being beaten or gang rape roleplay. To say that anorexia is outside my comfort zone would be incorrect. The girl is allowing someone else to endanger her life. Unlike breath play, gang rape roleplay, etc., there aren't "safety measures" that can be taken. There is no question that a 5'7" woman weighing 67 pounds is life threatening. As for ranja's comment about the smoking, the big problem with that is whether or people like or approve of smoking, it is legal. Sadly, only the OP seems to have been in touch with this person, the rest of us do not know her, live near her or are involved in her community. I think it is safe to assume that they are not active in their local BDSM community because I believe if they were, someone who knows them would not stand by and allow this to happen. I have been told how it is so easy to speak on morals but more difficult to act on them. For me that isn't the case. I also tend to believe that many people who continue to talk about her "right" to make this decision, if face to face with this young woman who is withering away day by day would also take a different position. The bottom line is that some things are, like it or not, simply wrong. As I mentioned before this "couple" could have "played" with this concept quite safely without endangering her life. Peon is quite right that even bystanders can be held accountable for standing by watching it happen. Not the people on this site, because we have no idea who these people actually are which prevents us from taking action. But it is sad that her parents seem to be aware and worried and are not doing anything. You say "what sort of sane person starves themselves" other people would say what sort of sane person does half the things listed as "interests" on the profiles side of the site. Either adults are able to do really fucked up and stupid things to themselves, that other people consider a sign of mental disorder, or they aren't.
|