CallaFirestormBW
Posts: 3651
Joined: 6/29/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LafayetteLady Calla, We are actually of the same belief when it comes to the idea of someone not wanting to accept treatment for a terminal illness. The problem is that you don't seem to allow for the depressed person who just feels nothing would ever get better and wants to end it all. They are phsycially healthy, but mentally depressed. Do you feel they are making a "rational" decision to blow their brains out, or do you do what is necessary to "force" upon them the psychiatric care they need. I understand that, and as I said earlier, it is definitely a place where you and I diverge. To be more clear, that place comes with the word "force". If I were approached by a person who was depressed, and who came to me for assistance in finding a way to hold on and not give in to hir despair, I would do everything in my power to provide the resources to enable that to happen. If I learned about someone who was in this state, and the individual did not approach me, but, instead, I approached hir to offer support, I would -OFFER-... but I would not "force". I would make recommendations, and it would be up to that person to decide whether or not to take that offer. You see, I suspect that I strongly diverge from much of the First World population in my ideas about this. It is my belief that, should a person decide that, for whatever reason, xhe no longer wishes to live this life, as long as xhe has attended to all of hir responsibilities and tied up all hir loose ends, xhe is within hir rights to decide that xhe no longer wants to maintain her energy in the physical form that xhe is now linked to. Regardless of terminal illness or anything else, I strongly believe that people -must- be able to choose, unequivocally, what happens to their own bodies. Where I draw the line is what we do to -other- people: mind, spirit, AND body. Even for my servants, I do not -force- their obedience. They stay, and they obey, and they serve because they -choose- to yield to me. If they were to change their minds. I would release them -- with some sadness, as the ones who have served us under these terms have, for the most part, been wonderful, expressive, talented, and dedicated individuals -- but with complete respect for their right to retain at least that measure of sovereignty over their own being. I completely embrace my responsibility to those who yield themselves to me, and have no problem whatsoever in maintaining authority over the lives of those who offer themselves in service. However, that one choice -- whether to yield or not -- resides on a day-to-day basis with the one who offers that life... not with me. Living or dying is the absolute right of the individual, in my mind, as long as xhe is competent to live on hir own and make decisions for hirself -- and, for me, I don't think that, in and of itself, a decision to end one's life indicates "incompetence". It is my contention that the compulsion to deny an individual's right to live or die as xhe chooses and when xhe chooses is a societal impulse that is rooted in fear of death, and in religious dogma ("suicide is a sin" and "only a god can decide when a person should live or die") to which I do not ascribe, and which, frankly, I often find coercive and manipulative. While I respect others' rights to their beliefs, their rights end at the boundary of my flesh. quote:
This is the same type of situation, when you add to that what I keep repeating and everyone seems to be completely missing. It wasn't THIS girl's desire to become pro-ana. It was this girl's desire to be the perfect, obedient slave, and her ability to decide who to serve is sorely lacking. We don't _know_ what this woman's "desire" was -- I know, from having worked with professionals who deal with ana/mia regularly (mostly because I'm heavily involved in the GLBT community -- any idea what percentage of gay men and TGs are also ana/mia -- answer: more than you'd guess!!!) that it is nearly impossible to sustain ana/mia regimentation without the -internal mindset- to support it. It is a rigorous, often painful, and typically complicated way to live. I have no idea whether this woman wanted the structure to be able to become more efficient at what she was doing, or whether she was genuinely involved in an unhealthy and unconsensual assault on her body. Without having the opportunity to speak with all the people involved and have a picture of the situation from the beginning, even the professionals I work with would have trouble sorting that out (and they wouldn't try), and this is why my attitude tends towards the "hands off" approach, once I've offered what sound advice I can -- because I can't know what was/is going on inside that person's head, and I am not qualified to judge competence with an open mind on the subject -- so my choice is to err on the side of personal freedom, because that is my philosophical bend. Someone else might err on the side of intervention, and that is something they must weigh on -their- conscience -- for me, my conscience would not allow me to strip away another person's freedom of choice, regardless of my personal feelings on the matter. Calla
_____________________________
*** Said to me recently: "Look, I know you're the "voice of reason"... but dammit, I LIKE being unreasonable!!!!" "Your mind is more interested in the challenge of becoming than the challenge of doing." Jon Benson, Bodybuilder/Trainer
|