laurell3
Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Elisabella quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyCimarron It doesn't say you have to help pay for them. It simply means you cannot STOP them from having children. The laws passed by the govn't say you have to help pay for them. Actually according to Laurell's post that she can't be bothered to substantiate, it's not in the Constitution but rather in the courts' interpretation of the Constitution. Since she won't bother actually linking that interpretation I can't really comment on anything specific, but I will say that IMO there's a difference between forcing someone to stop having children, and offering them money to stop having children, which would be more akin to welfare benefits. You're not bright are you? You resort to personal attacks when you are in over your head because you don't want to look foolish and don't understand the concepts. It's not intelligent debate. Look it up yourself if you don't believe me. I'm actually not your research whore and yes, that issue is dead in the water also. In fact, they cannot even suggest education on planned parenthood under one decision. Maybe instead of saying I don't know what I'm talking about, YOU should have a clue what the government can and cannot do prior to issuing your sweeping grand theories? eh?
_____________________________
I cannot be defined by moments in my life, but must be considered for by the entirety of my existence. When you fail to consider that I am the best judge for what is right for me, all of your opinions become suspect to me.
|