RE: Feminism and submission (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


DarkSteven -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 9:19:17 AM)

Bent, there's a fair deal of kidding around in these forums.  Relax.




BentUnit -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 9:25:04 AM)

I bet her Master would be pretty fucking relaxed with the little slut e-humping all comers.

How would we know?




jujubeeMB -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 9:52:56 AM)

Well, aren't you just a bucket of sunshine. You don't know the full story about my Dom and I, and give me a break on the flirting. Flirting is like required on these boards. So no need to judge.




BentUnit -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 9:58:25 AM)

Oh yes...SOOOO required........let's put it this way....get rid of your old Dom before you whore yourself out for another.
It'll end better.

I don't need to be a bucket of Sunshine to you, Petal.
You're worthless to me.




KariCloud -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 9:59:31 AM)

I went back and read what you wrote on page 7, and to me at least you've got some ideas about feminism that I and the other feminists I know won't agree with. Specifically:

quote:

It also means to me that people don't tell me I'm pretty to make me feel better, or think I ought to use my femininity to get a job done. It means that there are masculine and feminine characteristics, but those are neither male or female exclusively, and many people are sort of androgynous about them. It means that women with short hair and no makeup aren't brushed off and that women with gorgeous makeup and shiny long hair aren't instantly objectified. It means that anything a man values himself for a woman should be able to value herself for the same, and vice versa.


Feminism isn't about what OTHER people think, prefer, brush off, objectify, want, or desire. Feminism is about freedom of choice and about groups, governments, and the world not denying women anything that men are entitled to. An individual is free to objectify a dolled-up woman in makeup and high heels and a sexy dress to their heart's content. It is of course, feminist thought that the woman being so dressed does not equal her giving up her right to choose by dressing this way. But another person objectifying a woman in their minds, or even in words isn't against feminism. Not the way I have seen feminism defined.

quote:

I do genuinely find this in conflict with what I want. I think the responses so far have been brilliant takes on it, but where I get into trouble is when I'm in a situation with someone who expects my submission to be thoroughly feminine. Someone pointed out (I'm really sorry about the lack of names in this post - there were too many good ones) that I probably have had some bad experiences with Doms who treated me as if I genuinely was inferior, and that probably grated me the wrong way, but I have a really hard time really relishing the roles unless I feel like that element of inequality and power exchange is there. But at the same time, when a Dom is taking my submission for granted, I get this giant flare of anger, like "who does he think he is that I'll just submit to him and he deserves it??" Followed, of course, by incredible gratefulness at what he's doing to me. I just don't know how to cut out that obnoxious voice in between, and maybe it is the men I've been with.


There is a HUGE difference between a power imbalance and inequality. I am involved currently with two dominant people, a man and another woman. When they collar me, there will be a tremendous power imbalance because not only am I submitting, but I'm submitting to both of them. We are equally valuable now and will remain equally valuable when the power balance shifts. Nothing, no one, not any action on their part or mine will EVER be capable of reducing my value. They can objectify me all day, reduce me to tears and incoherent begging for nothing and I still have the same value as before. They can make me their little slut for weeks on end and I will still be just as valuable as I am now. They can act out rape scenes, force me into the most humiliating and degrading acts imaginable and still I am just as valuable.

My value does not change, ever. I am me, a powerful, smart, pretty, capable young woman with immense talants and creativity and absolutely nothing that they or anyone else can do will ever reduce my value.

Now, I might FEEL not valuable, and certainly if they did some of the above I'd go into a headspace of seeing them as gods and me as a worthless pawn or the like. But my actual value never changes.

So for me, none of the play we could engage in has any contradictions with my feminist ideals because it is all consensual between loving partners. If I played with someone who didn't care about me, and who actually saw my value lessened because of something they did, I'd never play with them again and I'd have some painful self-analysis to do to see why I played with such a person in the first place. But no matter what they thought of my value, it still didn't actually lessen. No one can make me worth anything less. No one. Not even myself. Certainly no other person.

Ok, last part of your post that I'm replying to:
quote:

But I swear, all I want to do half the time is push guys that I desire to knock me down so I get to be in that truly delicious, peaceful place of not being in control. (and as a side note, pushing Doms is not particularly successful...)


This desire you have is normal. I'm sure there are hundreds, if not thousands, if not more, people who feel the same. But unless you talk to your dom in advance about what you want, and what response you crave from him, it will NEVER work. The good dominants that I've known don't want to force someone to submit, they want someone who desires to submit to them. To force someone borders on to nonconsensual acts. Good dominants don't go there unless there is negotiation beforehand that makes it clear that this is what you want.

I do engage in power struggles. I have to know that those I submit to are more dominant than me. But they don't force me to submit, my desire and need to submit to them forces me to give in. And I make it clear when this kind of situation comes up that I WANT to lose the struggle, I tell them specifically, bluntly, clearly what I am doing and what I h ope their reaction will be. Then, I leave it up to them to decide what to do with the situation.

So my question is, how much have you told your dom about what you want? Does he know that you crave him pseudo-forcing you? Has he told you how he feels about that, one way or another? If he refuses to respond in the way you want, he may not want to engage in such play with you. If he does react the way you want him to, but you've never talked to him about it, then that throws up a number of red flags in terms of his integrity and such. Not to say he's a bad person, he may just be reading your signs well and reacting accordingly. So if you haven't sat down and talked this through with him, I suggest that you do so. and ask him outright if he sees your actual intrinsic value lessened when he and you play in this way. His answer to that, in my opinion, should be a resounding NO.





subexploring -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 10:01:08 AM)

The problem with these kinds of threads is everyone has their own personal definition of "feminism" and "submission". If you define feminism as "hey, women get to do their own thing, whether that's wearing a burka in a harem or running for President, you go girl!" then there's pretty much nothing that conflicts with it. But I don't believe that's what feminism in the West has actually been about.

I do think that submission conflicts with feminism in certain subtle ways. Basically, feminism is one of those political ideologies that presumes that people (women in particular) want to be autonomous individuals and make their own choices, wants to be to be independent and have the power that comes from that. At some level submissives do *not* want to be independent and autonomous. Power exchange is real.

quote:

ORIGINAL: jujubeeMB

I do genuinely find this in conflict with what I want. I think the responses so far have been brilliant takes on it, but where I get into trouble is when I'm in a situation with someone who expects my submission to be thoroughly feminine. Someone pointed out (I'm really sorry about the lack of names in this post - there were too many good ones) that I probably have had some bad experiences with Doms who treated me as if I genuinely was inferior, and that probably grated me the wrong way, but I have a really hard time really relishing the roles unless I feel like that element of inequality and power exchange is there. But at the same time, when a Dom is taking my submission for granted, I get this giant flare of anger, like "who does he think he is that I'll just submit to him and he deserves it??" Followed, of course, by incredible gratefulness at what he's doing to me. I just don't know how to cut out that obnoxious voice in between, and maybe it is the men I've been with.

....But I swear, all I want to do half the time is push guys that I desire to knock me down so I get to be in that truly delicious, peaceful place of not being in control. (and as a side note, pushing Doms is not particularly successful...)

I'm going to go back and revisit all the posts I just read through again, but I wanted to get this out there because I think it'll help. I'm not going off of a generalized definition of feminism, and it's not something I feel like I ought to want. I genuinely am a feminist, in the sense that I don't actually believe there are many differences between men and women, except biologically. And I want to relish the power I know I have, and find someone to give it to when I trust he'll give it back.


This is so romance-novel typical, especially the "flare of anger" part, that I just had to laugh. The classic romantic plot has that period of resistance by the woman that the man has to prove himself by overcoming. The woman of course secretly wants her resistance brushed aside and gets off on it. Taming of the shrew and all that.  This is yet another example of how feminism and female submission conflict -- feminism makes a huge point that "no means no" in all circumstances, but certain types of "no" just signal a secret desire for the man to push past resistance. (Other kinds of refusal are dead serious of course).

This stuff can conflict with establishing a relationship if you get hung up on or confused by your own resistance and can't break through to a calmer acceptance of submission. It sounds like you're feeling the conflict between some internalized expectations you have and your deeper emotional needs. I think a lot of times that kind of conflict fuels kink and fetishes, the conflict gets sexualized.




LaTigresse -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 10:07:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BentUnit

Oh yes...SOOOO required........let's put it this way....get rid of your old Dom before you whore yourself out for another.
It'll end better.

I don't need to be a bucket of Sunshine to you, Petal.
You're worthless to me.



Bless your heart...........such a treasure you are.

RE: your tag line.....somehow I don't think you have to work too terribly hard at the playing.




JstAnotherSub -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 10:20:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: BentUnit

Oh yes...SOOOO required........let's put it this way....get rid of your old Dom before you whore yourself out for another.
It'll end better.

I don't need to be a bucket of Sunshine to you, Petal.
You're worthless to me.



Bless your heart...........such a treasure you are.

RE: your tag line.....somehow I don't think you have to work too terribly hard at the playing.
Dammit LaT, you stole the bless your heart I was going to give.

Oh well, bless your heart anyhow Bent.  I gotta agree with the tagline thing too, now that I went and looked to see what it was.

So Bent, she flirting with someone you want to get your claws into or something?




BentUnit -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 11:00:09 AM)

The tag line...poor Petals!

Did you miss the significance of the *sic*.....<sigh>

I claim no innocence, nor do I claim clean hands.....

BUT....

I will act as devils advocate here that this so called..<ahem> female slave has claimed she is owned and yet has bad mouthed her Master on thread, displayed his property and flirted with other Dominants in plain sight in a transparent attempt to canvas for a new Dom without the decency of breaking it off with her old Dom.

I only speak of the truth.
If Doms can only see as far as the tits out avatar and the "poor little girl lost" persona and pay no heed to the heads up, well be it on their heads.
Chances are the female will be doing exactly the same thing on them judging by this performance should they choose to take "it" on.




jujubeeMB -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 11:09:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BentUnit
I will act as devils advocate here that this so called..<ahem> female slave has claimed she is owned and yet has bad mouthed her Master on thread, displayed his property and flirted with other Dominants in plain sight in a transparent attempt to canvas for a new Dom without the decency of breaking it off with her old Dom.


Not a slave, not property, fake flirting, and my damn nipple is my own nipple to display if I want to display it or not. You know why? Because I'm a damn feminist [:D]




JstAnotherSub -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 11:13:01 AM)

Well, alrighty then.

I am always thankful when someone is here to tell us what is really going on in someone elses head.  I wish someone could tell me wtf is going on in mine, but thats another thread.




BentUnit -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 11:21:06 AM)

Bleeeeeattttt...my heart is breaking for you Petal...honest it is.....feminist  you <choke> and all, Darling.

I'm sure all feminist all over the world would fall down on their knees and thank you for your particular sacrifice for the cause.

Now, before you cause me to vomit in my my own mouth...nighty night Petal.

Your worth any Dom who can't haul his brain out of his pants.

Joy to both of you.

Cheers.






jujubeeMB -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 11:27:14 AM)

Well, whatever happened in your own life to piss you off so much, I hope it's over and you're healing. Moving on.




NorthernGent -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 12:10:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BentUnit

quote:

ORIGINAL: jujubeeMB

Ok, fine, I'll move to London where all the feminist Doms are! You guys have healthcare anyway... [:D]


So Petal,

Your profile states you have a Master and you aren't looking?

I'm sure your Master approves of you running him down, getting your tits out on profile And avatar and flirting and leading on other Doms.

<sigh>

Oh but you protest at the attention in your profile!
There are words for that sort of device and Attention Whore is amongst them.



Gotta ask the OP.....why are you placing your body on show for the world to see? Feminism is nothing if not the idea that a woman should not hold her body........tits/tit/barely concealed nipple to be precise in this case......as the definition of her appeal......a woman must overcome the notion that the woman exists in large part as the object of male libidinal desire (according to feminist doctrine).

I would certainly agree with a central theme in your OP....you're confused.




RCdc -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 12:17:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: BentUnit

quote:

ORIGINAL: jujubeeMB

Ok, fine, I'll move to London where all the feminist Doms are! You guys have healthcare anyway... [:D]


So Petal,

Your profile states you have a Master and you aren't looking?

I'm sure your Master approves of you running him down, getting your tits out on profile And avatar and flirting and leading on other Doms.

<sigh>

Oh but you protest at the attention in your profile!
There are words for that sort of device and Attention Whore is amongst them.



Gotta ask the OP.....why are you placing your body on show for the world to see? Feminism is nothing if not the idea that a woman should not hold her body........tits/tit/barely concealed nipple to be precise in this case......as the definition of her appeal......a woman must overcome the notion that the woman exists in large part as the object of male libidinal desire (according to feminist doctrine).

I would certainly agree with a central theme in your OP....you're confused.


And this is why (not NG but what he has quoted) feminism SUCKS.

the.dark.




dvart -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 12:19:01 PM)

What makes you think that if you submit to a man, that means that you are his inferior ?
It could be argued that you have to be a stronger person to submit.




jujubeeMB -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 12:31:53 PM)

It's actually an interesting question. I would say that I chose that picture because I didn't want to show my face, but I wanted to show that I have a decent body, and the nipple was a mistake that I kept because it's a little bit hidden and a little bit distinct. I put the picture up to attract Dominant men on a BDSM dating site. It's not a picture of me with a cock in my mouth, it's not a picture of me marching in a Pride parade, it's a picture that I think is appropriate in the context I'm in. The response I generally get is that it's artistic, so I think it worked out well in not being vulgar or overly giving. I feel like it's a hint of what I give when I trust someone enough to show them my face.

I don't particularly think that feminism is not letting people see your tits. Though I'll have to give that one more thought...




NorthernGent -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 12:31:59 PM)

Oh and this freedom to choose thing.......you always have a choice....someone holds a gun to your head and you have a choice on how to react....still...

Were the 1850s women not making a choice? or were they being forced to act in a certain way? it was choice.

And where you believe that women were not choosing that life....then are you in fact saying that women are inferior by definition.....the inference being that women had no option other than to be overpowered by the male half who rendered them useless and left to the law of nature they'd have no hope.......and assuming those women didn't have a choice....then at want point did women in later generations suddenly acquire a choice? I'd imagine women always had a choice and due to the advance of certain ideas.....Liberalism being one of them.....women began to act on that choice with the goal being to redress certain ideas within society......

So....there's the paradox in the idea that feminism is the freedom to choose......

Which of course it isn't.....it is about getting out there and changing certain ideas in society....such as women aren't suited to leadership positions.....such as women exist as the object of male libidinal desire.....such as women are destined to be homemakers and childbearers.....





SimplyMichael -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 12:32:00 PM)

God there is some seriously deep bullshit in this thread.

I am a man, I don't hold my deep voice in check, in fact, I cultivate it.  I don't hold my height in check, in fact, I strive to hold my head high, I recognize those things as tools and I use them to my full advantage.  If I need help, I don't pick the short guy who is going to give me attitude, I look for a woman.

I don't assume women are stupid, less, whatever, for doing the same thing.  To ME, feminism is about looking at people as individuals, it is about ensuring an even playing field, and if you are playing basketball, the tall ones win, if it is about competing intellectually, the jocks usually aren't going to make the cut.

You want to be a strong woman and it turns you on to paint a guys nails pick, give him a bottle brush and have him rape your ass with it, while you sing "Old MacDonald" in a rubber tutu...AND you have the ability to choose any path but chose that one, more power too you.






NorthernGent -> RE: Feminism and submission (7/5/2010 12:42:08 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: jujubeeMB

It's actually an interesting question. I would say that I chose that picture because I didn't want to show my face, but I wanted to show that I have a decent body, and the nipple was a mistake that I kept because it's a little bit hidden and a little bit distinct. I put the picture up to attract Dominant men on a BDSM dating site. It's not a picture of me with a cock in my mouth, it's not a picture of me marching in a Pride parade, it's a picture that I think is appropriate in the context I'm in. The response I generally get is that it's artistic, so I think it worked out well in not being vulgar or overly giving. I feel like it's a hint of what I give when I trust someone enough to show them my face.



Were I you....I'd be asking myself: a) why did I choose my body to attract a man b) how does this tie in with feminism?

I wouldn't get too wound up about it....people like to cling to an idea....an ideology....but I'd say people are far too complicated to have their wings clipped by an ideology.

quote:

ORIGINAL: jujubeeMB

I don't particularly think that feminism is not letting people see your tits. Though I'll have to give that one more thought...



I'd agree. I imagine hetrosexual feminists are keen on a spot of close contact.......moreover....I'd assume they're quite content with womanhood and less reluctant than some other women.....but they would never see their collective body as the fruit to attract a man.




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875