porcelaine
Posts: 5020
Joined: 7/24/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: mistoferin I've always wondered why, on a site geared for discussions of BDSM, there seems to be a lack of interest in threads that actually discuss it. The threads that talk about hands on, active BDSM techniques, tips, styles. Most especially anything that relates to safety. These threads tend to have low participation. erin, Your observation is correct and I participate on CollarMe, Fetlife, and another private site for women. While many laud Fetlife for the depth of subjects covered, it is rife with many of the issues that have been mentioned in this thread and others as well. It is far from the Holy Grail. And in my opinion they are far less tolerant, more combative, and filled with caricatures that believe their interpretations of dominance and slavery are the real mccoy. There's also a fixation with extremism some have adapted that I suspect is typographical nonsense meant to entertain. Unfortunately, it presents a dubious message to those with less experience and dare I say commonsense to dismiss the tomfoolery they're reading. quote:
Yet threads such as "Men in my panties" go on for pages and pages, train wreck threads, fat threads, wanker threads...those threads thrive. I realize that those types of threads have an entertainment factor but gosh. I think the drama factor is the common bond in the examples shown. I see this all the time over yonder and I can always tell by the thread title when we're heading for a big derail. quote:
I posted a thread the other day regarding safety and cleanliness during blood play. I think two people have responded. Maybe because although it is definitely a BDSM issue, it got moved down to "Health and Safety". That section doesn't seem to get much traffic....unless of course there is a thread by some wanker who wants to talk about his asshole. A few weeks ago I posted a thread regarding the possible transmission of communicable diseases during microbranding. Same result...not much interest. This is where I find differences on this site versus the other. I'll read responses from people that have never done that, but have all sort of ideas (many porn inspired or something they gleaned from the blind leading the blind) and they're offering advice that might indicate otherwise. Whereas here the lack of participation may reflect disinterest, inexperience, or ignorance regarding the thread's existence. However, much of this is related to how the question is framed. When you narrow it down you're petitioning a specific segment versus inviting everyone to the table. For future reference it may be helpful to pose a general question that will stimulate discussion and include a helpful reference or two, and an additional one that addresses the subject in greater depth. Threads designed in this fashion often garner more participation, feedback, and most walkaway learning something in the process. quote:
So do we really just want to be entertained and titillated here? Why the seeming disinterest in things that will give us knowledge in WIITWD or have the potential of making WIITWD safer? Large communities have merit, but I've often felt that smaller intimate places get down to the nuts and bolts of things without all the theatrics in between. In my opinion the expectations of seriousness are ill conceived. Irregardless of the site's position, the makeup will always be diverse. For some that includes serious discussion, others a bit of fun, and the rest something in between. For those desiring to cover more pertinent subjects that address hands on practices, perhaps you might consider posing a question of the week to ensure the continuity of the thing you believe is woefully lacking. ~porcelaine
_____________________________
His will; my fate.
|