hertz
Posts: 1315
Joined: 8/7/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
LadyPact: I thought you had referred to your partner as your wife in another post. I started my replies by talking about a theoretical relationship - others were talking husband and wife, so I went with it. But I decided that I needed to explain why I was holding such a contrary position, and decided to share my own personal situation, which differs in this small matter. Apologies for the confusion. quote:
In my personal opinion........a TRUE dominant does not lie QFT. Unfortunately, it has been my experience that people who call themselves 'dominant' are sometimes very willing to lie in order to save face. quote:
Firebirdseeking: Or, far more complex, cheating, being unfaithful, is a response in a relationship where an essential part is broken, but both parties are too invested, either financially, or emotionally, in a codependent manner, to leave, or to fix it. I can see illness making someone unavailable for sexual intimacy, and if that is a permanent condition, then those individuals need to work something out with integrity, perhaps. I agree that a more open and honest response would be ideal. I have never suggested otherwise. I am not suggesting cheating as a lifestyle choice, but only as a plausible last resort. I wonder about your use of the term 'integrity'. From where I stand, to 'work things out with integrity' suggests an open and honest dialogue must happen, and agreement must be reached. This is the very definition of integrity. On the surface, this seems a pretty water-tight argument. Lies can never be part of a relationship, can they? However, if insisting on integrity results in the breaking of the relationship altogether, is that really preferable? Surely, if acting with integrity is going to destroy the very thing it is supposedly protecting, then there are questions to be asked? And this is my dilemma. I have a relationship which is damaged in a fairly obvious way. But it's a relationship I value highly, as does my partner. My tentative exploration of the difficulty in the relationship suggests to me that making an open and honest deal in order to fulfill my own (selfish) needs would lead to disaster and could threaten the stability of the relationship - and it is a very stable relationship. I believe this to be true, and my partner's responses to date, in a theoretical kind of way, suggests to me that she does not want to take the risk of breaking things any more than I do. Choices. It comes down to choices. Do I risk breaking everything in order to maintain 'integrity'? Or do I throw integrity to the winds and risk being judged for my dishonesty? Of course this sort of question will lead to snorts of derision from those morally unblemished souls who are minded to sit in judgement, but there is little I can do about that. I have chosen to dismiss my integrity in favour of maintaining a damaged relationship and getting my needs met. It's as simple as that. NB Edited to correct a quote fault, not to retract a personal attack...
< Message edited by hertz -- 9/7/2010 2:20:55 PM >
|