Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/27/2010 6:59:16 AM   
wandersalone


Posts: 4666
Joined: 11/21/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lally2

i dont understand waryness on here - what can happen??

grins...for me Lally it is not waryness of these types of messages, it is weariness


_____________________________

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. Martin Luther King
Godmother of the subbie mafia
My all time favourite threads
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2002501
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=790885

(in reply to lally2)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/27/2010 7:21:44 AM   
LadyNTrainer


Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DMFParadox

I think I sent LnT a message many moons ago that went along the lines of, "Dominant fitness trainer? Cool idea!" ...No response back. But whatev; I wasn't really trying for one, I just thought it was a good idea and said so, then moved on. Neutral to me means no expectations.


I do respond to genuinely neutral comments of that nature, generally with a polite note plus my standard boilerplate of further explanation of what lifestyle-friendly personal training is and how it works.  No record of you in my inbox in the last six months however.


quote:


Fuck me. 500 lbs? Maybe, one day far in the future, if I keep up my training like I have been I'll get close to that. But right now it feels like watching someone walk to the goddamned moon and send a postcard.


Change the machine you're pressing on if possible or if you're stuck at a plateau.  The amount of weight can very significantly vary depending on the ergonomics, and you'll work slightly different muscles.  You can vary the position in which you are pressing also, but beware of injury and never press in a position where you don't have full and comfortable back support.  Also, going up 90 lbs at a time with the 45's is unrealistic, so keep some smaller plates handy for gradual increases.  Very low reps in your sets (3-5) at near-maximum load will best serve your goals of increasing your numbers, as will the really brutal rest-pause method of doing 1 or 2 reps at very near your 1RM, resting briefly, then doing another 1 or 2, until you can't stand up any more.  Assisted negatives are also fun.  That's how I got to 500 lbs and habitually embarrass a lot of big, strong guys in the gym who are loading fewer plates than a short chick. 


_____________________________

Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.

(in reply to DMFParadox)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/27/2010 10:21:02 AM   
lally2


Posts: 2621
Joined: 4/16/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wandersalone

quote:

ORIGINAL: lally2

i dont understand waryness on here - what can happen??

grins...for me Lally it is not waryness of these types of messages, it is weariness



giggle:) - i hear you, i really do!

_____________________________

So all I have to do in order to serve him, is to work out exactly how improbable he is, feed that figure into the finite improbability generator, give him a fresh cup of really hot tea ... and turn him on!

(in reply to wandersalone)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/27/2010 4:19:29 PM   
DMFParadox


Posts: 1405
Joined: 9/11/2007
Status: offline
I'm going for endurance/slow twitch training right now, but when it's time to ramp up I'll keep that advice in mind.

Edit - actually, would that help with endurance too?


< Message edited by DMFParadox -- 11/27/2010 4:25:44 PM >


_____________________________

bloody hell, get me some aspirin and a whiskey straight

"The role of gender in society is the most complicated thing I’ve ever spent a lot of time learning about, and I’ve spent a lot of time learning about quantum mechanics." - Randall Munroe

(in reply to LadyNTrainer)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/27/2010 5:37:19 PM   
NotSoLilOne


Posts: 10
Joined: 11/21/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

I send observational notes to profiles that catch my eye while signing on. Harmless, neutral, conversational overtures.

Where the women are concerned:

(1) 50-65% of those notes go unread.

(2) 15% are read without a reply.

(3) 15% are read with a nominal reply of either a few words or one short sentence.

(4) 5% might write two sentences or more.

(5) 1% might engage. (AKA, read my profile and the reply says something of thoughtful, responsive interest.)

This concerns just simple conversational PMs, neutral in content (non sexual) but related to the recipient's profile.

I'm not putting forth a great deal of effort or thought in sending the message to the recipient (its just a spontaneous thought, usually) -- just stuff you'd say to someone you meet in passing on the ST.

I don't ever take offense. I am not herein complaining.

The stats above have not been scientifically recorded.

Curious what your observations are. The standard line here is that Fs get such a high volume of mail and that so much of it is inappropriate that such messages as the one's I'm sending get ignored or filtered into oblivion. Beyond that, I am somewhat struck by the lack of curiosity on the other side and the near total disinclination to engage.

Other standard reasons that I see are: (1) Kink misalignment; (2) already in a relationship; (3) age differences; (4) suspicious of the Trojan Horse, etc. -- result in someone who is generally "not interested."



I am guilty of pretty much all of these. However I have been on here for a little less then a week and have 10 pages of mail, I can't read them all, nor do I want to. Occasionally I will write back and see if things seem to be clicking, some do, some don't.

If I read it and don't respond it's usually for one of these reasons:

You can not type a complete sentence.
You can't spell.
You were rude.
Your first message asks me if I want to "chat".
You are above or below my age preference.
You are no where near my location.
Your message is a "form" letter that is sent out to every new person that joins the board.

You get the picture, lol.

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/27/2010 6:32:26 PM   
LadyNTrainer


Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DMFParadox
Edit - actually, would that help with endurance too?


Not specifically, no.  It really depends on your goals and on what else you're doing.


_____________________________

Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.

(in reply to DMFParadox)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/28/2010 8:28:56 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer
You have such an amazing ability to tell strangers on the Internet what their relationships are really like. *snicker* Is your real name Kreskin?
  I'm not saying anything you haven't already told me - my perspective on what it means is different to yours.

quote:

Reading your post is the best laugh I've had all day, and we've been watching comedy movies for the holiday. LOL If you really don't have a clue what I was saying, I'm not wasting any more electrons explaining it again.
  You're confused.  Basically if you were speaking for yourself then it's irrelevant to the discussion and if you were speaking for all women, then you were simply talking nonsense. 

quote:

For you, it's a negative. For other people, it's a positive. Your posts are all about how you know everything there is to know about men and women. People who disagree with you are wrong or lying, not oriented differently. You may not be able to see what's wrong with this picture, but most other folks can.
  If you're a heterosexual man looking for a hetero or bisexual woman then the vast majority of the time it's a negative.  Given that men are probably running around dating more straight women than you are, I think we've probably got a bit more insight into this issue than you do.

quote:

Again, because we have fundamentally different views and orientations, I'm either wrong or a liar. You are utterly unable to comprehend what I'm getting at, so you decide that I'm lying so you can keep on believing that the world is that small.
  No, you're a liar because you manufactured a rationale for your statement instead of simply copping it sweet and admitting fault.  Your orientation is irrelevant and I'm amused by you continually resorting to a straw man whenever you're cornered on something.

quote:

And now we see what he really thinks of submissive men. It's not pretty.
  Actually that was more about the poly thing.  Submissive men are another issue, but what I think of them is not something that really has bearing except you continually try and drag your poly 'family' into this discussion as though it's the slightest bit relevant.  It's not, so why you keep mentioning it is beyond me.

quote:

So you think poly as well as femdom is basically pathology, and can only be practiced by unhealthy people who are users and abusers.
  I think the scenario you describe betrays your attitudes and that exploitation is inevitable.  Indeed, it's a common scenario going by the poly people I've known.

quote:

I'd tell you again that this bears absolutely no resemblance to my family, but that would be pointless. You're quite sure you know everything there is to know about me and my relationships, and your delusions are actually pretty entertaining, so I'll leave you to them.
  I'm quite certain your 'family' is completely fucking irrelevant to the discussion, but you have a fundamental inability to focus your mind on the actual point.  You might want to keep in mind, that - despite what you may think - discussions are rarely all about you.

(in reply to LadyNTrainer)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/29/2010 1:28:02 PM   
LadyNTrainer


Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
You're confused.  Basically if you were speaking for yourself then it's irrelevant to the discussion and if you were speaking for all women, then you were simply talking nonsense.


Actually, you're the only one in this discussion who is attempting to speak broadly for all women or all men.  Sweeping generalizations are usually inaccurate, and quite often have more to do with the speaker's emotional state than with reality.


quote:

If you're a heterosexual man looking for a hetero or bisexual woman then the vast majority of the time it's a negative.  Given that men are probably running around dating more straight women than you are, I think we've probably got a bit more insight into this issue than you do.


You're stating that a man has more insight into what women want than a woman does.  Do you not see the fundamental flaw in this logic?


quote:

No, you're a liar because you manufactured a rationale for your statement instead of simply copping it sweet and admitting fault.  Your orientation is irrelevant and I'm amused by you continually resorting to a straw man whenever you're cornered on something.


According to you, dominant women, submissive men and everyone who does poly are all irrelevant.  Except that we're not.  We're real too, and you don't get to define How Things Are between men and women based solely on your own hetero-mono-male dom world view.  You are welcome to state how things work *for you* and in your own experience.  You will be regarded with much less contempt if you speak truthfully from your own perspective as opposed to trying to preach ultimate universal truths about gender and relationships. 

I generally speak from my own perspective and experience with the understanding that I also respect folks who are wired differently.  I don't need to manufacture rationales for my statements because they already make sense.  Sometimes I may need to explain them more than once to someone who seems very dense. 


quote:

Actually that was more about the poly thing.  Submissive men are another issue, but what I think of them is not something that really has bearing except you continually try and drag your poly 'family' into this discussion as though it's the slightest bit relevant.  It's not, so why you keep mentioning it is beyond me.


See above.  My own perspective and experience are the basis for what I'm saying, and I can't really speak from someone else's perspective.


quote:

I think the scenario you describe betrays your attitudes and that exploitation is inevitable.  Indeed, it's a common scenario going by the poly people I've known.


Poly is abuse, blah blah blah, you're oriented differently from me so you're a bad person and you're doing it wrong, blah blah blah. 


quote:

You might want to keep in mind, that - despite what you may think - discussions are rarely all about you.


And you might want to keep in mind that you don't get to define the entire BDSM community as wrong or right according to your personal sexual orientation or morality.  You can speak for yourself, but you can't speak for all of us.


_____________________________

Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/30/2010 12:04:18 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer
Actually, you're the only one in this discussion who is attempting to speak broadly for all women or all men.  Sweeping generalizations are usually inaccurate, and quite often have more to do with the speaker's emotional state than with reality.
  Actually no.  This is essentially my own fault - I was under the mistaken impression the OP was essentially a Dominant looking for a female sub.  As such, my discussions were pitched at that particular audience.  Sweeping generalisations aren't necessarily inaccurate but they provide useful rules of thumb which operate well most of the time.

Of course, given his kink orientation, it's my contribution to the discussion, rather than yours, which is essentially pointless.  I've inadvertently derailed the discussion with a point of view which is irrelevant to the original poster.  Hoist by my own petard.  This is pretty much what I accused you of doing, so I can only be amused by the irony.

As such, a good deal of the discussion is probably founded upon my original mistake.  Although I have strongly held views which I'll bring up naturally in the course of a discussion, I'm not interested in aiming them specifically at people who will likely find them antithetical to their own kink.

quote:

You're stating that a man has more insight into what women want than a woman does.  Do you not see the fundamental flaw in this logic?
  How on earth can a man propose to dominate or master a woman if he doesn't know her better than she knows herself?

Talk to women en masse and many of them will quite readily admit they don't understand themselves.  In my experience, yes, men often have insights into what women want that exceed their own self-knowledge.  There's variance of course, depending upon the individuals in question.  However before you scoff, I'd point out that if women really did understand themselves better than we did, they wouldn't fall for our bullshit.  Men often tell women what they know women want to hear.

I'll leave the rest of your post.  Most of it proceeds from my own error.  Obviously we disagree on certain points, but the subsequent playing out of the discussion was fueled mostly by my original misunderstanding.  Let's leave it at that - and I'll depart to allow you good people to continue.

(in reply to LadyNTrainer)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/30/2010 8:27:15 AM   
LadyNTrainer


Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
I was under the mistaken impression the OP was essentially a Dominant looking for a female sub.  As such, my discussions were pitched at that particular audience.  Sweeping generalisations aren't necessarily inaccurate but they provide useful rules of thumb which operate well most of the time.


They also have the side affect of annoying folks whose lives don't revolve around that particular perspective.  Again, if you speak from your own experience and orientation and make it clear that this is what you're doing, it's totally cool to share.  If you speak from your own experience and perspective, pitched at a particular audience, but make it sound like you're claiming that everyone does it that way or should do it that way, it's going to stir up some shit in a diverse community.


quote:

Although I have strongly held views which I'll bring up naturally in the course of a discussion, I'm not interested in aiming them specifically at people who will likely find them antithetical to their own kink.


Thing is, being oriented the way I am isn't a kink so much as basic brain wiring.  I don't eroticize female led poly relationships because they're kinky and they turn me on, although these things can certainly be true.  This is fundamentally the relationship style that works best for me and for the men I tend to choose as life partners, and not just because of our kinks.  Your views seem to suggest that this isn't so, or can't be so, or that we're doing it wrong.  I'm sure that you and people wired like you would be utterly miserable if they attempted my personal relationship configuration, and I'm equally sure that people wired like me would be miserable if they attempted to subscribe to your views. 


quote:

Talk to women en masse and many of them will quite readily admit they don't understand themselves.  In my experience, yes, men often have insights into what women want that exceed their own self-knowledge.  There's variance of course, depending upon the individuals in question.  However before you scoff, I'd point out that if women really did understand themselves better than we did, they wouldn't fall for our bullshit.  Men often tell women what they know women want to hear.


I have no arguments with your stating your personal experience.  I will add mine, which is that on the fortunately rare occasions I get a good look into the neurotypical social world of lies and deception, women are successfully pulling it off on their partners far more often than men.  And their men are oblivious, as most men do not focus on reading subtle cues and are worse at detecting lies than women.


quote:

How on earth can a man propose to dominate or master a woman if he doesn't know her better than she knows herself?


How on earth can a woman or a man master themselves if they do not have a genuine depth of self-knowledge and the ability to be brutally self-honest as well as clearly aware of their own wants and needs? 

This actually touches an earlier topic, folks who aren't actually on anything I that would recognize as a personal path of mastery, but who play one in the bedroom.  There are plenty of those on both sides of the kneel.  In these cases you could well refer to their predilection as merely a kink.  

I am not a big fan of the word "true" in our lifestyle, as it usually carries a good deal of bullshit baggage.  But if you are discussing the mastery of another person as opposed to topping and bottoming, then mastery of self is arguably an essential prerequisite.  Women who tread this particular path face the same trials as men, which is to say that we had better be as capable of fully knowing and disciplining ourselves as we are of others. 

And there are a number of major pitfalls on it, one of which is that sometimes we really don't know what another person is thinking and feeling, especially if we don't actually know them.  It is a huge red flag when a dominant claims to know what you are really thinking and feeling better than you do and it's a totally inappropriate circumstance.  Generally if you're talking to strangers on the Internet, especially strangers who may be oriented quite differently from you, you'll be wrong.


_____________________________

Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/30/2010 10:10:32 AM   
AquaticSub


Posts: 14867
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


I'm not putting forth a great deal of effort or thought in sending the message to the recipient (its just a spontaneous thought, usually) -- just stuff you'd say to someone you meet in passing on the ST.
.......

Curious what your observations are. The standard line here is that Fs get such a high volume of mail and that so much of it is inappropriate that such messages as the one's I'm sending get ignored or filtered into oblivion. Beyond that, I am somewhat struck by the lack of curiosity on the other side and the near total disinclination to engage.



Honestly, if it's just a standard thing that you might say to someone on the street, I may or may not respond. If someone passes me on the street and speaks to me, I may only nod and smile. Sometimes just depends on if I have anything to say in response. Sometimes, I admit, I'm jaded - I just get a feeling that it isn't simply casual conversation and that the one little line will (as it has in the past) turn into an issue. Sometimes I note it, get pulled away from the computer and don't make answering a priority because it was such a casual comment.

I try to answer e-mails from people I know from the forums, even if it's a "Look, I really don't think we should talk privately because I think it will escalate and I'd rather us try to stay civil".

quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja

i recently received a note saying that i was not allowed to send any mail to the writers mail box until they knew me better... haha... the plan to get to know us better was through the boards. As if , but who knows, the person might actually read this and respond... it might explain why some people use these boards as a chat room..



Speaking of... if you are refering to message I sent to you which you deleted, the word allowed was never used. I wrote:

quote:


Until we have a more friendly relationship, I would prefer that we keep our interactions to the boards. It's my experience that things stay more civil that way.

As for me having the last word, I'm not interested in having the last word. I am grateful you brought it up because I learned something. If our definations of public play are different, I truly don't care. It just means that, by your defination, I'm ok with some forms of public play and not with others. My defination is different.

I hope that you are having a lovely day and, in the future, please post whatever you like on the threads publicly till we are closer. Hopefully we'll bridge the gap between us.

Respectfully,

Aqua



If not and you are referring to someone else, my apologies of course.

< Message edited by AquaticSub -- 11/30/2010 10:14:34 AM >


_____________________________

Without my dominance you cannot submit. Without your submission I cannot dominate. You are my equal in this, though our roles are different.-Val

It was ok for him to beat me but then he tried to cuddle me! - Me

Member:Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair

(in reply to cloudboy)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM - 11/30/2010 8:47:44 PM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

Well, as you can imagine, overtures vary. Sometimes there is more to them. One thing that strikes me clearly is that women don't lack for mail in the inbox. and mail from others borders somewhere between being an adventure (less likely), a discovery (not too likely), mildly interesting (more likely) to a chore and bother (most likely.)

(in reply to AquaticSub)
Profile   Post #: 92
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Neutral Overtures -- via CM PM Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094