LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DMFParadox This. Though... /r9k/?? It's /b/tard all the way. It does suck on both sides, that's what I've been saying. But commentary like that of the posts I've been disputing does nothing to help that. Just as I tell dudes who are complaining to get off the boards and go meet people, because they have a better option, so too do I tell women to learn how to appreciate the difficulty of approaching online and recalibrate their conversational approach, because it's a far better option. As far as writing better initial letters, I've said in the past that inflammatory emails tend to get a better response from this site, in some instances, which is why a lot of men write them. In that same thread I also said that it didn't set things right for a long term relationship so don't bother, even if the short term gain is increased. Those statements, from a completely different thread, got dragged into this one and mangled to shit. Which makes it not worth bothering to be nice to the posters in question, most of whom are coincidentally female, which then made it a battle of the sexes when it wasn't originally intended to be one. Just a battle against fools. I blame the environment for poor luck. A relatively small sample of active participants, scattered across the globe, vastly outweighed by dabblers, scammers and inactive accounts; most men don't stand a chance at getting what they're looking for, and are better off elsewhere. Women who have full inboxes every time they log on have a different strategy, and frankly, though it may suck there's a way to make it not suck, which is what I'm pointing out: actively search for the good elements, encourage them, talk about them, and ignore the nonsense, because there's so much nonsense it's just pointless. I don't blame women for men's poor success. I only blame women for not dealing with their problems differently, instead of the insanity of trying the same approach over and over with increasing frustration. While I really think this is straying from the original topic (and I'm going to do it twice) I'll grant you some of this. I'll agree with you on some of the points: Yes, I'm of the firm belief that people of both genders are better going out and meeting people. Yes, part of this is part of the environment. Every person on this site has a history of sending and/or receiving contacts that form their perceptions. Nobody came here thinking that 90% of their email would be crap that they didn't want to receive or that 90% of their initial email wouldn't be answered. What created the environment are the people who set the stage. More often than not, this stems from the "other side" of CM, which you detail. Yes, there absolutely is a way to make it not suck. These options are provided by the site. One is to hide your profile to begin with so that only people from the forums can contact you in the first place. Two is to put something in your profile regarding who you are willing to converse with and if people can't live up to that criteria, block them and report it as spam. It absolutely works wonders! Since this option has been made available, much of the problem has been solved. Here's where I don't agree with you: No, I seriously don't have to care one way or another about how men don't stand a chance of finding what they are looking for here, their poor initial contact attempts, or bending over to kiss somebody's ass for their frustrations. Frankly, when somebody sends Me an initial contact that's screwed up, I tell them so before employing the method that I describe above. When enough people tell them, they'll learn. The lumps that take during that process are really none of My concern. Now, I said I was going to do it twice, so here is that. Exactly how are you seeing that people who you have blocked are making entries on this thread? It was My understanding that, when someone was blocked, you don't see them. Yet, you mentioned that you have Lockit hidden from view, but you knew she posted, even though none of her comments were quoted and not a single entry reads as "in reply to" with her name on it. I'd love to hear how that works.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|