Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/14/2010 7:09:08 PM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
Those who claim there in no precedent for the govt. requiring individuals to maintain insurance should read the Militia Act of 1792.

"I. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That each and every free able-bodied white male citizen of the respective States, resident therein, who is or shall be of age of eighteen years, and under the age of forty-five years (except as is herein after excepted) shall severally and respectively be enrolled in the militia, by the Captain or Commanding Officer of the company, within whose bounds such citizen shall reside, and that within twelve months after the passing of this Act. And it shall at all time hereafter be the duty of every such Captain or Commanding Officer of a company, to enroll every such citizen as aforesaid, and also those who shall, from time to time, arrive at the age of 18 years, or being at the age of 18 years, and under the age of 45 years (except as before excepted) shall come to reside within his bounds; and shall without delay notify such citizen of the said enrollment, by the proper non-commissioned Officer of the company, by whom such notice may be proved. That every citizen, so enrolled and notified, shall, within six months thereafter, provide himself with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch, with a box therein, to contain not less than twenty four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to contain a proper quantity of powder and ball; or with a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch, and powder-horn, twenty balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a pound of powder; and shall appear so armed, accoutred and provided, when called out to exercise or into service, except, that when called out on company days to exercise only, he may appear without a knapsack. That the commissioned Officers shall severally be armed with a sword or hanger, and espontoon; and that from and after five years from the passing of this Act, all muskets from arming the militia as is herein required, shall be of bores sufficient for balls of the eighteenth part of a pound; and every citizen so enrolled, and providing himself with the arms, ammunition and accoutrements, required as aforesaid, shall hold the same exempted from all suits, distresses, executions or sales, for debt or for the payment of taxes."



_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/14/2010 8:41:08 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: zenny

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

I find it quite interesting that people seem to think a singular thing (health care) is the end all be all of longevity. As to "tests that don't need to be done" I'm of the understanding that those extra tests are done to increase certainty and also because unlike ALL other countries in the WORLD we have hospitals with more and better tech.


Our mortality/morbidity rates do not support your last statement.

Many of those extra tests are to prevent or to support the Dr in a lawsuit. Nothing more.


Reread my statements and think about it. Then get back to me.



The UK is top in many fields of medicine. Are you suggesting other countries dont have our technology? Are you arrogant enough to believe that only the US hospitals can find cures? If what you are trying to say is true, why is the US ranked below so many countries in health care year after year?

I read it well the first time. My position isnt changing.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to zenny)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/14/2010 9:32:27 PM   
zenny


Posts: 275
Joined: 2/13/2008
Status: offline
quote:

The UK is top in many fields of medicine.

The U.S.A. is top in many fields of medicine as well. What's your point?

quote:

Are you suggesting other countries dont have our technology?

Of course other countries don't have our technology or the quantities of it. That's a given. Now would you like to quantify that by specifying a technology(ies) or country(ies)? I think the UK, like Canada, will have most of our technology and perhaps even some we may not but their per capita is crap.

quote:

Are you arrogant enough to believe that only the US hospitals can find cures?

Obvious Red Herring.

quote:

If what you are trying to say is true, why is the US ranked below so many countries in health care year after year?

You seem to be under the mistaken impression that those ratings only take into account ability and not other things. You also use this to ignore my original statement that health care is NOT the only factor in a populations longevity

quote:

I read it well the first time.

Apparently you didn't comprehend it though.

quote:

My position isnt changing.

Are you saying that pointing out your errors of attribution and logic and otherwise destroying your arguments won't change your mind?

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/14/2010 10:01:01 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Of course other countries don't have our technology or the quantities of it. That's a given. Now would you like to quantify that by specifying a technology(ies) or country(ies)? I think the UK, like Canada, will have most of our technology and perhaps even some we may not but their per capita is crap.


http://dll.umaine.edu/ble/U.S.%20HCweb.pdf

I think you should read this. Per this study by the University of Maine, the US health care system is "the most expensive health care system in the world, based on health care expenditures per capita (per person) and on total expenditures as a percentage of GDP."

Just because we spend more doesnt mean its better.

We are ranked 33 and 46, depending on which source you use, in infant mortality rates... and both lists have us behind sountries like Cuba, waaaaaaay beneath South Korea.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_infant_mortality_rate

As far as longevity...

By any measure, the United States spends more on health care than any other nation. Yet according to the World Fact Book (published by the Central Intelligence Agency), it ranks 49th in life expectancy.

Why?

Researchers writing in the November issue of the journal Health Affairs say they know the answer. After citing statistical evidence showing that American patterns of obesity, smoking, traffic accidents and homicide are not the cause of lower life expectancy, they conclude that the problem is the health care system.


Peter A. Muennig and Sherry A. Glied, researchers at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University, compared the performance of the United States and 12 other industrialized nations: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland. In addition to health care expenditures in each country, they focused on two other important statistics: 15-year survival for people at 45 years and for those at 65 years.

The researchers say those numbers present an accurate picture of public health because they measure a country’s success in preventing and treating the most common causes of death — cardiovascular disease, stroke and diabetes — which are more likely to occur at these ages. Their data come from the World Health Organization and cover 1975 to 2005.

Life expectancy increased over those years in all 13 countries, and so did health care costs. But the United States had the lowest increase in life expectancy and the highest increase in costs.


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/health/30life.html

In terms of longevity, the US ranks 36, tied with Cuba, well below Germany, Switzerland, Canada and the UK.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to zenny)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/16/2010 4:03:42 PM   
zenny


Posts: 275
Joined: 2/13/2008
Status: offline
Sorry I'm late in my replay. I have things to do other than cruise a forum 24/7.

quote:

http://dll.umaine.edu/ble/U.S.%20HCweb.pdf

I think you should read this. Per this study by the University of Maine, the US health care system is "the most expensive health care system in the world, based on health care expenditures per capita (per person) and on total expenditures as a percentage of GDP."


Red Herring

quote:

Just because we spend more doesnt mean its better.


Tangentially related but you may be going somewhere with it...

quote:

We are ranked 33 and 46, depending on which source you use, in infant mortality rates... and both lists have us behind sountries like Cuba, waaaaaaay beneath South Korea.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_infant_mortality_rate


And you don't. Red Herring.

quote:


By any measure, the United States spends more on health care than any other nation. Yet according to the World Fact Book (published by the Central Intelligence Agency), it ranks 49th in life expectancy.


Still Red Herring...

quote:


Researchers writing in the November issue of the journal Health Affairs say they know the answer. After citing statistical evidence showing that American patterns of obesity, smoking, traffic accidents and homicide are not the cause of lower life expectancy, they conclude that the problem is the health care system.


Life expectancy increased over those years in all 13 countries, and so did health care costs. But the United States had the lowest increase in life expectancy and the highest increase in costs.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/30/health/30life.html
 


Okay, now we're going somewhere... maybe... Oh look, you're quoting a newspaper article, that's no good. Well, at least they provided their source; I'll look at that. Hmm, it doesn't appear to be a scholarly journal, I'll check my schools database (~97% of scholarly journals are in it with millions of entries). Can't even find a single entry for that particular journal, so at best it's a tech journal which itself takes snippets of other articles and statistics. You have quoted a quotation of a quotation. Congratulations, that's retarded.

Well, I'll at least look at the abstract. Oh look at that, no mention at all pertaining to health care being THE problem with life expectancy. There is a mention of:

quote:

The findings undercut critics who might argue that the US health care system is not in need of major changes.


Okay, Fair enough. I think most people would say that health care as a whole has problems(what system doesn't?). Which part are we talking about? Procedures? Doctors? Nursing? Billing? Sanitation? Research? The list goes on and breaks down even more. There wasn't even a mention of statistical significance in the abstract (something that tends to happen if they found something). Sorry, your quotation means nothing now.

Your bolded portion is the equivalent of  saying "if you eat more chocolate you have a higher IQ". Sure, you can have a high correlation but it doesn't mean they effect each other in any meaningful way. Hell, the article is about inefficiency (with money), not that the system can't do it's job.

quote:

In terms of longevity, the US ranks 36, tied with Cuba, well below Germany, Switzerland, Canada and the UK.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy


And we finish off with a Red Herring.

Lets look back to the original statement:

quote:

I find it quite interesting that people seem to think a singular thing (health care) is the end all be all of longevity.


Notice that I didn't say it doesn't. However, I did say it's not the HUGE thing everyone wants to make it out to be.

One last thing.

quote:

The researchers say those numbers present an accurate picture of public health because they measure a country’s success in preventing and treating the most common causes of death — cardiovascular disease, stroke and diabetes


This is also from your quotation. In reading this you should note that it speaks about things that are HUGELY effected by lifestyle choices.  The health care system can educate and attempt to help when someone ignores its advice but it cannot prevent bad decision making which is largely what "prevention" is about. That falls to the individual. Were you to look at statistics related to over all health (not health care) of the U.S.A. population and compare it to other nations you would perhaps begin to see that it's a damn miracle that we live so long. Why? Because our health care is so damn good at catching us after we fuck up. That is why people from other countries come here for health care.

< Message edited by zenny -- 12/16/2010 4:06:34 PM >

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/16/2010 4:34:07 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
 "That is why people from other countries come here for health care."

Dont you know the figures for health tourism to and from the US ?  

(in reply to zenny)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/16/2010 8:26:28 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Pst, he will claim its a red herring if it doesnt agree with his point of view.

US Healthcare is NOT the best in the best in the world. Its just the most expensive.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/16/2010 8:38:54 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Sorry I'm late in my replay. I have things to do other than cruise a forum 24/7.


Dont be sorry. No one, especially me, was waiting for you to respond.

A red herring... hmmm... responding to your post with facts isnt a red herring. i suggest you look up the meaning.

What im still waiting on is proof of your positions, which you have yet to provide.

YOU claim the US health care is the best in the world. Prove it.

YOU claim that people come here for health care because its so much better than what they have, Prove it.

I would love to see your proof.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to zenny)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/21/2010 6:08:33 PM   
zenny


Posts: 275
Joined: 2/13/2008
Status: offline
A Red Herring is a fallacy in which an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue. The basic idea is to "win" an argument by leading attention away from the argument and to another topic. This sort of "reasoning" has the following form:
  1. Topic A is under discussion.
  2. Topic B is introduced under the guise of being relevant to topic A (when topic B is actually not relevant to topic A).
  3. Topic A is abandoned.
Taken from: http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/red-herring.html (it's easier to c&p than copy from a text book).

It's something you do a LOT in threads. You also go for the "I'm the last one to post so I must be correct" approach as well.

Infant mortality has a lot of factors, Parental care being the largest. Hospitals being a one of the smallest. It is tangentially related at best and thus I put it under red herring. I call red herring because I don't feel like explaining why your unrelated facts are such. Frankly, I don't care to "defend" my viewpoint as I'm having a good time showing yours for the crock they are. Its been fun, tata.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/21/2010 10:44:25 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
lol... if you dont like the red herrings, why are you the one bringing them up? The per capita issue was your red herring. I merely addressed it. Dont like them being addressed, dont raise them.

As far as infant mortality.... ahem...

The infant mortality rate (IMR) is the number of deaths of infants under one year old per 1,000 live births. This rate is often used as an indicator of the level of health in a country.

When countries with socialized medicine has a better indicator of a level of health than we do, your damn straight its relative and important. Just because YOU dont like the results does not make them insignificant.

quote:

I call red herring because I don't feel like explaining why your unrelated facts are such.


Its not because you dont feel like it, its because you cant. Easier to hide behind being lazy than to admit you were wrong.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to zenny)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/22/2010 1:31:55 PM   
zenny


Posts: 275
Joined: 2/13/2008
Status: offline
Level of health ≠ level of health care (attribution fallacy on your part). I've already so much as stated we're a rather unhealthy country. Some rereading for you

quote:

things that are HUGELY effected by lifestyle choices.  The health care system can educate and attempt to help when someone ignores its advice but it cannot prevent bad decision making which is largely what "prevention" is about. That falls to the individual. Were you to look at statistics related to over all health (not health care) of the U.S.A. population and compare it to other nations you would perhaps begin to see that it's a damn miracle that we live so long. Why? Because our health care is so damn good at catching us after we fuck up.


I'm sure that last bit of rationalization helps you sleep better at night, so go for it :)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/22/2010 9:38:27 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

The infant mortality rate (IMR) is the number of deaths of infants under one year old per 1,000 live births. This rate is often used as an indicator of the level of health in a country.



Often misused as an indicator of the level of health. It doesnt take into account the level of at risk pregnancies, survival to birth of babies that would have been stillborn in other countries, and differing standards from country to country of what is counted as an infant death.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/22/2010 9:45:17 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Under the assumption that the US is the only country that doesnt listen to health advice, under the assumption that the US is the only country that has drug use, alcoholism, diabetes, ect ect ect... the list goes on and on... then what you stated COULD be true. However, each country has its own set of problems, equalizing out the equation.

Having said that...

quote:

The World Health Organization (WHO), in 2000, ranked the U.S. health care system as the highest in cost, first in responsiveness, 37th in overall performance, and 72nd by overall level of health (among 191 member nations included in the study).


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_the_United_States

As far as your insisting we look at overall level of health.... here you go... and the US is indeed at the bottom of the pile.

http://www.photius.com/rankings/world_health_performance_ranks.html

Health ranking poor.

quote:

United States of America 72


Life expectancy low.

Infant mortality rates low.

How many other indicators do you need to see?

Will a comparison of the US system with the Greece one suffice?

http://allcountries.org/health/usa_health_care_2008_nyt.html

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to zenny)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/22/2010 9:56:20 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

Those who claim there in no precedent for the govt. requiring individuals to maintain insurance should read the Militia Act of 1792.

"I. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That each and every free able-bodied white male citizen of the respective States, resident therein, who is or shall be of age of eighteen years, and under the age of forty-five years (except as is herein after excepted) shall severally and respectively be enrolled in the militia, by the Captain or Commanding Officer of the company, within whose bounds such citizen shall reside, and that within twelve months after the passing of this Act. And it shall at all time hereafter be the duty of every such Captain or Commanding Officer of a company, to enroll every such citizen as aforesaid, and also those who shall, from time to time, arrive at the age of 18 years, or being at the age of 18 years, and under the age of 45 years (except as before excepted) shall come to reside within his bounds; and shall without delay notify such citizen of the said enrollment, by the proper non-commissioned Officer of the company, by whom such notice may be proved. That every citizen, so enrolled and notified, shall, within six months thereafter, provide himself with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch, with a box therein, to contain not less than twenty four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to contain a proper quantity of powder and ball; or with a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch, and powder-horn, twenty balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a pound of powder; and shall appear so armed, accoutred and provided, when called out to exercise or into service, except, that when called out on company days to exercise only, he may appear without a knapsack. That the commissioned Officers shall severally be armed with a sword or hanger, and espontoon; and that from and after five years from the passing of this Act, all muskets from arming the militia as is herein required, shall be of bores sufficient for balls of the eighteenth part of a pound; and every citizen so enrolled, and providing himself with the arms, ammunition and accoutrements, required as aforesaid, shall hold the same exempted from all suits, distresses, executions or sales, for debt or for the payment of taxes."




Its called a draft and is explicitly constitutional with Congress being given the power to raise and support armies.

< Message edited by willbeurdaddy -- 12/22/2010 9:59:10 PM >


_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to Hippiekinkster)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/22/2010 10:00:10 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
It's called medicare and social security.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/22/2010 10:01:09 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: zenny

Are you saying that pointing out your errors of attribution and logic and otherwise destroying your arguments won't change your mind?



You'll learn very quickly that there is nothing new about that.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to zenny)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/22/2010 10:03:36 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Life expectancy low.

Infant mortality rates low.

How many other indicators do you need to see?



They are related indicators. Take out the misleading infant mortality rate and murder, which obviously has nothing to do with the health care system, and voila, the US is at the top of life expectancies.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/22/2010 10:07:37 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Insisting that those two are misleading is assinine, something i have come to expect from you. Other countries also have infant deaths and murders. Putting the US back where we are when removing those factors from other countries too.

quote:

Take out the misleading infant mortality rate and murder, which obviously has nothing to do with the health care system,


Why would you assume infant mortality has nothing to do with health care?

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 12/22/2010 10:14:41 PM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/22/2010 10:15:04 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Insisting that those two are misleading is assinine, something i have come to expect from you. Other countries also have infant deaths and murders. Putting the US back where we are when removing those factors from other countries too.


I left out accidents, my bad. The rate of murder and accidents is far higher in the US. Take them out and life expectancy in the US leads the world. We also lead the world in 5 year cancer survival rates for every common form of cancer.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law - 12/22/2010 10:16:23 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Again, why would you assume infant mortality has nothing to do with health care?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Judge rejects key part of Obama healthcare law Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094