RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

flcouple2009 -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 1:09:53 PM)

Your trying to discuss facts with Sanity,    [8|]



rulemylife -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 1:13:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I suppose you want to know how I really feel...



Why would you think that?

You'll just keep spitting out your childish insults which only demean you.



rulemylife -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 1:19:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

Your trying to discuss facts with Sanity,    [8|]


Someone has to try.  [sm=biggrin.gif]



Anaxagoras -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 1:47:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
Its true that he didn't trash Jews but he did state his organisation was strongly pro-Palestinian which is unfitting for any mainstream media institution.

Are you sure? I don't think there's any media outside of Israel that doesn't lean that way at the moment. Even the Murdoch lot don't seem mad keen on the occupation of the west bank at present.

Yeah I'm sure - balance in dealing with any issue a very simple principle of ethical journalism. A few mainstream news outlets aren't too bad when it comes to the subject.

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
Whether the video was edited to make him look bad or not, it does seem clear though that Schiller makes very pointed attacks on conservative values and politics. I think this goes to the core of a much broader problem that confronts everybody. Generally speaking, with a few notable exceptions, the media does have a definite left wing or liberal perspective, that is sometimes an agenda with "advocacy journalism" which has become extremely popular. I don't consider myself to be particularly right or left wing so don't have a big ideological axe to grind but it seems to me this bias is profoundly damaging because the media is the primary source of information in society. If there is a particular emphasis in one direction or the other, it will inevitably influence the direction of a given society for the bad (or if for the good then for the wrong reasons). I think an agenda driven news media is extremely undemocratic.

Thank God for FOX News then, huh?

The only "fair and balanced" media source.

AFAIK Rulemylife seem to accuse those that disagree with his perspective as being fans of Fox News. Balance is balance is balance. Its got nothing to do with being left or right - that's the whole point! I don't actually get Fox News, being in another part of the world where it isn't commonly available. Left wing bias is an issue that even those with integrity on the left should care about because it unnaturally skews opinion. The BBC is an example of one institution with an agenda. The BBC's news anchor Peter Sissons wrote a book about the BBC which is pretty startling in its criticism. Here is an extract http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1349506/Left-wing-bias-Its-written-BBCs-DNA-says-Peter-Sissons.html



DomKen -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 1:51:17 PM)

FR

This little manufatroversy is indicative of something I've been noticing for quite some time. Certain elements of the right are quite clearly working together to attack groups they don't like. We all remember the attacks on ACORN culminating in the O'Keefe fraud.

Recently an O'Keefe immitator failed in her attempt to fake video of Planned Parenthood at the same time Republicans in the house were trying to defund the organization
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/feb/10/abortion-usa

Now we have O'Keefe himself getting into the fray against NPR while Drudge is running story after story attacking NPR and the House Republicans are going after all of public broadcasting. The reason to go after NPR instead of PBS is that the right knows if they directly attack Sesame Street they will lose.



Sanity -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 2:10:56 PM)


No, the reason to go after NPR instead of PBS is that NPR is admittedly using public funds to push their political agenda.



Moonhead -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 2:14:25 PM)

Quite. Nobody anywhere else in the media is doing that, are they?



Sanity -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 2:18:13 PM)


Using public funds?

No.



Moonhead -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 2:27:50 PM)

Yes.
Outside of the 'States a lot of television stations are publicly funded.



rulemylife -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 2:32:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

AFAIK Rulemylife seem to accuse those that disagree with his perspective as being fans of Fox News. Balance is balance is balance. Its got nothing to do with being left or right - that's the whole point! I don't actually get Fox News, being in another part of the world where it isn't commonly available. Left wing bias is an issue that even those with integrity on the left should care about because it unnaturally skews opinion. The BBC is an example of one institution with an agenda. The BBC's news anchor Peter Sissons wrote a book about the BBC which is pretty startling in its criticism. Here is an extract http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1349506/Left-wing-bias-Its-written-BBCs-DNA-says-Peter-Sissons.html


How can you comment on what you have not seen?





Sanity -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 2:34:10 PM)


You didnt mention you were referring to Iran or Cuba or China or the Congo.

There is no end to state sponsored propaganda outside the U.S., is there.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Yes.
Outside of the 'States a lot of television stations are publicly funded.



jlf1961 -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 2:36:39 PM)

Sanity, you forgot about the BBC



Sanity -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 3:28:07 PM)


Yeah, I forgot.

Didnt realize the thread was about European nanny states, my bad.



Jennislut -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 3:51:22 PM)

quote:

Game
Set
Match

YOU..........are the weakest link
[sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=yourock.gif]

She may not have her facts lined up but you gotta admire this girl's moxy - only 59 posts and already tacking on Sanity and the trucker while they are in full froth...and doing it with a flair.

welcome to P&R jennislut

ETA - ok I got carried away i'm sorry i was way out of line with this post.  i'll try to act my age from now on



Sanity -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 4:05:35 PM)


Alright, whose sockpuppet are you?

LOl...

You leftists are too funny sometimes. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jennislut

quote:

Game
Set
Match

YOU..........are the weakest link
[sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=applause.gif][sm=yourock.gif]

She may not have her facts lined up but you gotta admire this girl's moxy - only 59 posts and already tacking on Sanity and the trucker while they are in full froth...and doing it with a flair.

welcome to P&R jennislut

ETA - ok I got carried away i'm sorry i was way out of line with this post.  i'll try to act my age from now on




Sanity -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 4:07:57 PM)


Ah, one of Lucys sockpuppets.

Got it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jennislut

quote:

The organization they claimed to represent was the Muslim Brotherhood, which the Muslim Brotherhood does indeed exist.
No, your wrong

I quote from the article: "The men, who identified themselves as Ibrahim Kasaam and Amir Malik from the fictitious Muslim Education Action Center (MEAC)"

you obviously didn't even read the article

Game
Set
Match

YOU..........are the weakest link


Most of us realise this, welcome to the gang:)




domiguy -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 4:19:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

You don't really expect anyone to believe anything by O'Keefe do you?



Yup. Anybody who's head isnt up their own posterior. Bye Bye NPR funding.




What a stupid statement to make.

How many stupid statements does that make? Is anyone keeping score?




domiguy -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 4:25:56 PM)

I know of a couple of wiburisms that were so off base.

he doesn't care about truth. Wilbur is a nut job whose word means absolutely nothing.

Remember these gems?

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3298601/mpage_1/key_bet%252Cwilbur/tm.htm#3298706

Here is another turd that I caught falling from wilbur's mouth.

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3414417/mpage_1/key_bet%252Cwilbur/tm.htm#3416024

wilbur how much this time? you already owe me thousands of dollars.

Pay up!!!



Lucylastic -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 4:45:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Ah, one of Lucys sockpuppets.

Got it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jennislut

quote:

The organization they claimed to represent was the Muslim Brotherhood, which the Muslim Brotherhood does indeed exist.
No, your wrong

I quote from the article: "The men, who identified themselves as Ibrahim Kasaam and Amir Malik from the fictitious Muslim Education Action Center (MEAC)"

you obviously didn't even read the article

Game
Set
Match

YOU..........are the weakest link


Most of us realise this, welcome to the gang:)




WRONG, LMAO can you get ANYTHING right??




Sanity -> RE: Grubbing for Muslim Brotherhood money (3/8/2011 5:40:22 PM)


You may as well have bought advertising on the Goodyear Blimp, its so obviously you.

You realize admin knows by your IP address dont you?



Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875